her improvements:
--Dictating with the forehand when he gets it
--Keeping rally shots deep
--Retrieving on the defense better
Still problems:
--Doesn't approach down the line enough, or at the right times
--Goes to the slice at the wrong times (even though, overall, he needs to use the shot in his arsenal)
Today 02:55 PM
even when he's playing someone else?DashaandSafin said:How come he dosen't approach down the line? Every time he crosses it, he gets passed by Gonzo's backhand.
Gonzo hits pretty damn hard, I doubt Federer could do THAT much more. Besides, Roddick was passed enough in that match, you can't pass 'em everytime. This thread was created to show Roddick's improvment. His volley's and backhand were horrendous before, defiantly not top 10 ATP level.tennus said:Sorry, just because a commentator says so doesn't make it true. There is not one volley made by Roddick in that clip which I would not expect to be made by any ATP player. I'm not saying Roddick can't volley but he sure as hell would have been cut up on those approaches by a Federer slice or a dipping Nadal drive. I was impressed by the clutch drop volley by Gonzales though.
You are right about Fed and Gonzo. I've made the same argument elsewhere (to Rabbit, I think), that with a few players it does make sense to approach crosscourt a little more often. Andy's right to avoid Gonzo's forehand. But I think Gonzo ran around at least one of those approaches to his backhand and creamed a pass. Maybe I'm misremembering he clip now . . .GRANITECHIEF said:Watch again and notice that some of the approaches were the slice down the line to the forehand. He got passed every time using that play. Cross court approach is definitely more risky but you also have to balance that with attacking the opponents weaker wing, ie the backhand of Gonzo and Fed too.
alienhamster said:You are right about Fed and Gonzo. I've made the same argument elsewhere (to Rabbit, I think), that with a few players it does make sense to approach crosscourt a little more often. Andy's right to avoid Gonzo's forehand. But I think Gonzo ran around at least one of those approaches to his backhand and creamed a pass. Maybe I'm misremembering he clip now . . .
Anyway, my main point was that Andy all too often goes cross-court when coming in, making it way too easy to pass him.
But yeah, he did great against Gasquet, didn't he? He's much improved at net lately.
Great clip... I hope grosjean can keep that play up.... My 2 pics from Roddicks last couple of weeks:ragnaROK said:Yeah it's still ugly but it working better now. I personally think Roddick's volleys from his match with Grosjean in Madrid were more impressive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pM3QeN1MxCo&NR
Okay, dude. Comparing Roddick's volleys to one the greatest volliers in the history of sport is pointless and unfair. Honestly, Sampras makes Federer look like an amateur if we're strictly talking about volleying ability.Xevoius said:Did anyone see Pete Sampras give Roddick a volley lesson in the exhibition match?
Pete made winning points off Roddick look effortless. I was also totally impressed how effective his half-volleys were from the service line area.
akj27 said:and federers groundstrokes make sampras' look like karlovic's
Wimbledon 2004 Final was definately not his best match......actually ide rank it as mediocre at best. Fed read just about every approach shot flawlessly, the only points Roddick made at net were off federers errors on the passing, and a couple decent volleys. He was passed by rogers backhand about 3/4's of the time he moved to net.illkhiboy said:Were Roddicks volleys ever too bad? Was watching the Wimbledon Final 2004 sometime back and in the first set, Roddick's down 0-40, and pulls out three points serve and volleying. And not just knocking off easy balls, but half-volleys off low-returns and showing quick reflexes, and even good touch. Fluke? Perhaps. But he certainly was never one of the worst volleyers on tour like people claim he was.
In that match he was also returning really well, hitting clean winners off Federer's serve with his forehand AND backhand. In fact, he hit his backhand well throughout that match. I guess he was just in the zone. When else has he played THAT good?
Nextman916 said:Wimbledon 2004 Final was definately not his best match......actually ide rank it as mediocre at best. Fed read just about every approach shot flawlessly, the only points Roddick made at net were off federers errors on the passing, and a couple decent volleys. He was passed by rogers backhand about 3/4's of the time he moved to net.
Actually 2005 now that i recall. I have the clip downloaded on my computer, my apologies. His Wimbly 2005 match was a complete onslaught, 2004 he did do goodillkhiboy said:Are you sure your not talking about the final played the following year? Roddick in the 2004 Final did not seem 'mediocre' to me. Probably not his best, but IMO close to it.
crazylevity said:Not to hijack this thread, but are a lot of people serving n volleying in Madrid? I saw clips of Roddick and Federer's matches...seemed like a relatively higher percentage of serving n volleying...wonder how Nadal would cope with this. Would he chip n' charge??
TacoBellBorderBowl1946 said:
DashaandSafin said:Overall improvement from Roddick. Hits through the ball rather than just spining it in like the last 2 years.