Likes to lose matches in streaks too.
5 losses in the 81 matches streak.
3 losses in the 43 matches treak.
Likes to lose matches in streaks too.
5 losses in the 81 matches streak.
3 losses in the 43 matches treak.
how arrogant of feder to allow the streaks to grow so he can look heroic when he snaps themLikes to lose matches in streaks too.
5 losses in the 81 matches streak.
3 losses in the 43 matches treak.
steakrRoger loves eating steaks.
.
He has to be conscientious like that, because his house has a lot of windows.Roger loves ending streaks
Like Freddie vs Kuerten?Excuses. Losing to a player 6 year older at your absolute peak.
Nadal and Djokovic like ending them too since they ended two of Federer's greatest streaks. 65 consecutive grass matches (Nadal '08 Wimbledon) and 10 straight GS finals (Djokovic '08 AO). That sword pretty much cuts both ways.
Yeah I mean the level they are at they are most likely all going to end eachother's streaks. Nadal ended Fed's streak of winning grand slam finals as well in 2006 at RG.
I may be biased but I do think the streak that Fed ended of Djokovic's was notable mainly because the epic length of the matches Nole had won including 500s and masters where you'd expect Nole to more vulnerable to an upset than in a slam, and also because the last person to beat him before the streak was also Fed. That's more of a funny stat though, and if Fed hadn't beat him Nadal of course would have had a chance or maybe it would have been Murray in Cincy
With the clay streak he ended, in a way it's remarkable that Nadal didn't have a random loss like he did to Ferrero in 2008. All streaks will end so it's partly plying great and a bit of luck sometimes
You forgot Roger's winning streak in finals and maybe on hard too, not sure.Nadal and Djokovic like ending them too since they ended two of Federer's greatest streaks. 65 consecutive grass matches (Nadal '08 Wimbledon) and 10 straight GS finals (Djokovic '08 AO). That sword pretty much cuts both ways.
I believe Nalbandian is the guy who ended his winning streak in finals.You forgot Roger's winning streak in finals and maybe on hard too, not sure.
Like Freddie vs Kuerten?
33 years old Michael Jordan would destroy 27 years old Kobe in a one on one game.Excuses. Losing to a player 6 year older at your absolute peak.
Like Freddie vs Kuerten?
Fed's 10 final, 19 SF and like Zillion QF streaks took a gazillion years to be broken
True.I believe Nalbandian is the guy who ended his winning streak in finals.
You forgot Roger's winning streak in finals and maybe on hard too, not sure.
33 years old Michael Jordan would destroy 27 years old Kobe in a one on one game.
Easier to end someone's winning streaks when he suffered from mono.Nadal and Djokovic like ending them too since they ended two of Federer's greatest streaks. 65 consecutive grass matches (Nadal '08 Wimbledon) and 10 straight GS finals (Djokovic '08 AO). That sword pretty much cuts both ways.
Bet you couldn't say that with a straight face.Fedr was not peak on clay yet. Just like Nadal was not peak yet on grass despite making two finals.
Fedr was not peak on clay yet. Just like Nadal was not peak yet on grass despite making two finals.
False hypothesis. Untestable statement . They have never played one on one ever
Nothing beats being bageled by a 31-year old when you're at your peak tho.Roger loves being part of someones streak:
1 from 4, not bad at all
That's not how basketball works.33 years old Michael Jordan would destroy 27 years old Kobe in a one on one game.
Likes to lose matches in streaks too.
5 losses in the 81 matches streak.
3 losses in the 43 matches treak.
This line of thinking = that '08 Wimby Nadal became peak once he converted his Championship Point? So in theory Nadal was @ one stage during the '08 Wimby 5th set where he was a break point + A Federer service hold away from losing?
5 points away from not being peak because he would have lost? So peak = result not actual level of play?
How about this , what if '08 Wimby Nadal played worse than in a parallel universe where he played much better in another Wimby '08 Final yet Federer played slightly better & beat the better version of Nadal?
In theory the better version of Nadal or closer to peak version would lose whilst the slightly lesser-than-peak Nadal won? Hmmmm ...
Nothing beats being bageled by a 31-year old when you're at your peak tho.
My post was sarcastic obviously. Ned was prime in 06-11 on grass and peak from 07-10.
I was saying this because Ned fans use convenient peaks.
LOL.False hypothesis. Untestable statement . They have never played one on one ever.
Unfalsifiable claims !
LOL.
This is delicious. “Untestable statement/claim, maleficent hypothesis, unverifiable conjecture, nontrue sentence, double pinky cross-fingered promise” are some of Sport’s favourite terms in here.
Synergy - I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to burst out laughing.I just couldn't pass up on the opportunity.
Oops you got likes and I got zilch. You win and I don't know how.Nothing beats being bageled by a 31-year old when you're at your peak tho.