Saudis make billion dollar offer to merge ATP and WTA tours, add January Masters tournament

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
Just like with the Premium Tour plans, there are no details on what this will actually mean for tournaments and fans. Is $1B going to buy them a Masters hosting role and a sportswashing headline that they helped to integrate the WTA with the ATP or does it mean other wholesale changes for the sport?
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Players used to play either in the Middle East or the Hopman/Brisbane at the beginning of January, so it restores the status quo ante.

KSA would have to buy the controlling body of the slams, so all four slams would have to agree, and that is not happening anytime soon.

They will conduct a tournament in January which will interfere with the AO warmups. Then they will purchase the AO and move it to Singapore.
 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
Just like with the Premium Tour plans, there are no details on what this will actually mean for tournaments and fans. Is $1B going to buy them a Masters hosting role and a sportswashing headline that they helped to integrate the WTA with the ATP or does it mean other wholesale changes for the sport?
I just think this is much ado about not much.
 

vokazu

Hall of Fame
Saudi giving up all of their oil in exchange for ATP WTA 1000 in Mecca would be awesome.

All players will be invited to throw stones at the pillars of the devils and running around the Kaaba for a warm up.
 

tennis24x7

Professional
It depends on how separate the PIF is from the government. I am sure they would have made it as separate as possible.

Another issue is whether a single financing entity should be able to control the tours, government or not.
Yeah right separate, really?
 

tennis24x7

Professional
Instead of this why doesn't the ATP hold a 250 with significant prize money where the top 128 players are excluded from playing or holding it during the same time as one of the majors. Will go a long way in helping out the people struggling to make it on the tour.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
It's not clear what this rather paltry $2 billion figure does buy as a unified tour would have to re-write the structure of the tour. It leaves Gaudenzi on top, clearly.

But does the PIF take half the tour that used to belong to the bosses, and the players remain with their "lesser half"? Or does PIF just join with the other bosses?

Just like with the Premium Tour plans, there are no details on what this will actually mean for tournaments and fans. Is $1B going to buy them a Masters hosting role and a sportswashing headline that they helped to integrate the WTA with the ATP or does it mean other wholesale changes for the sport?
 
Last edited:

sureshs

Bionic Poster
Instead of this why doesn't the ATP hold a 250 with significant prize money where the top 128 players are excluded from playing or holding it during the same time as one of the majors. Will go a long way in helping out the people struggling to make it on the tour.
Hardly anyone watches Challengers. How would the tournament break even?
 

THUNDERVOLLEY

G.O.A.T.
Is it me or does $1 billion seem… very low?

Perception often drives market value, or rather, what a person or company is willing to offer for it. Unfortunately (or perhaps its a comment on this era of tennis), 1 billion (or two) is about as high as any entity is willing to offer for professional tennis. Weigh the value of tennis against the NBA or NFL--that's as uneven a scale as one can imagine.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
KSA is buying a seat at the table for $2 billion, plus a male and female Master's, not the whole box and dice.
 

PMF

Semi-Pro
Yikes. I didn’t think this would happen so fast. Hopefully, the KSA offer will get rejected. I hate what they’ve done with professional golf.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
I can't see this not happening, although this view is based on the idea that the KSA is merely buying a seat at the table.

Yikes. I didn’t think this would happen so fast. Hopefully, the KSA offer will get rejected. I hate what they’ve done with professional golf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

PMF

Semi-Pro
Who are the people who will decide?

Good question. If I’m reading the articles correctly, the owners of the Masters 1000’s decide on the KSA offer? Not sure who decides on Premium Tour offer proposed by Grand Slam owners. Players plus owners of tournaments?
 

Bisquick

Rookie
Yikes. I didn’t think this would happen so fast. Hopefully, the KSA offer will get rejected. I hate what they’ve done with professional golf.
Aramco is all over the place - was watching some concacaf soccer and they’re all over that.
And we know how it’s going over with F1.

Waiting for the Aramco handball championships for the euros, the Aramco pro bull riding championships for the muricans, and the Aramco curling championships for the Canadians
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Better_Call_Raul

Hall of Fame
To those claiming that the $1 Billion KSA offer is a lowball offer, it is a reasonable offer.
Please keep in mind that tennis tournaments are not all that particularly profitable.
:rolleyes:


Although the AO’s revenue’s are high and generally increasing YOY, so are its expenses, and the event has faced financial battles over recent years due to the pandemic.

AO’s recent financial performance summary:
2020 & 2021: $100 million+ loss (combined)
2022: $4.4 million profit
2023: $62 million profit

In 2023, the Australian Open reported a record profit of $62 million, largely due to the Victorian Government forgiving a $43 million COVID debt.
However, finance losses for the period increased to $6.4 million.

 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
Good question. If I’m reading the articles correctly, the owners of the Masters 1000’s decide on the KSA offer? Not sure who decides on Premium Tour offer proposed by Grand Slam owners. Players plus owners of tournaments?
IW owner is Larry Ellison. Miami owner is IMG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Don't go into business, Saul, you are too "woke" to understand how it works.

To those claiming that the $1 Billion KSA offer is a lowball offer, it is a reasonable offer.
Please keep in mind that tennis tournaments are not all that particularly profitable.
:rolleyes:


Although the AO’s revenue’s are high and generally increasing YOY, so are its expenses, and the event has faced financial battles over recent years due to the pandemic.

AO’s recent financial performance summary:
2020 & 2021: $100 million+ loss (combined)
2022: $4.4 million profit
2023: $62 million profit

In 2023, the Australian Open reported a record profit of $62 million, largely due to the Victorian Government forgiving a $43 million COVID debt.
However, finance losses for the period increased to $6.4 million.

 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
This means that the AO is worth 10 billion dollars today.

"The Australian Open is a $500m+ tournament and wants to become a $1b tournament. The AO currently generates around $500 million in revenue per year and is aiming to reach $750 million revenue within 5 years?.
 

Tshooter

G.O.A.T.
To those claiming that the $1 Billion KSA offer is a lowball offer, it is a reasonable offer.
Please keep in mind that tennis tournaments are not all that particularly profitable.
:rolleyes:...

Our favorite BCR is now a financial analyst. :D Remember you had no clue what DCSR was and you were scratching your head as to how the USTA could maintain its stellar credit rating despite a large amount of long-term debt and a no fans USO. :confused:

In any case, whatever this proposal is it doesn't directly involve the Majors.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
One billion dollars to the ATP and one billion to the WTA is buying KSA two Masters ... and a seat at the table ... the unified tour is what Gaudenzi wants.
 

Better_Call_Raul

Hall of Fame
The Australian Open offers $50 million in prize money
Riyadh should just go ahead and host a $100 million tournament in January. The players will definitely come.
Watch Craig Tilley and Bart squirm.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The ATP/WTA have a monopoly control over labour. They are essentially a racket. Riyadh has put its offer on the table to the official bodies.

What the prize money is would be in line with what Master's events habitually offer.

The Australian Open offers $50 million in prize money
Riyadh should just go ahead and host a $100 million tournament in January. The players will definitely come.
Watch Craig Tilley and Bart squirm.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The time-sensitive nature of this offer revolves around the WTA agreeing to become a part of a bigger organisation.

Otherwise, this would be a done deal today.
 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
The Australian Open offers $50 million in prize money
Riyadh should just go ahead and host a $100 million tournament in January. The players will definitely come.
Watch Craig Tilley and Bart squirm.
Do you literally just make stuff up?


Their prize money is 86.5 million.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The prize money pool at Indian Wells is $18 million, so that's a third of the AO in USD.

KSA would therefore not offer 100 million in prize money, but more like 20 million for a joint Master's.
 

Better_Call_Raul

Hall of Fame
The ATP/WTA have a monopoly control over labour. They are essentially a racket. Riyadh has put its offer on the table to the official bodies.

What the prize money is would be in line with what Master's events habitually offer.

The players are supposed to be independent contractors. Free to play anywhere they choose.

In any case, $1 Billion is a reasonable starting point offer for ATP (ATP only, not WTA). Certainly nothing more than $1.5 Billion.
Why? Because these ATP Masters 1000 events are not all that profitable. There are many expenses involved. And unlike other sports the TV viewership is very limited.

KSA would therefore not offer 100 million in prize money, but more like 20 million for a joint Master's.

If they choose to follow the ATP guidelines. But nothing is preventing KSA from hosting a $100 million January tournament in Riyadh during AO.
And hopefully these independent contractor players will be free to choose where they play. A win-win for all.
 
Last edited:

Impetus

Semi-Pro
Why? If you're good enough, your talent is spotted early and the academies pay for much of your expenses (as an investment).

If you aren't good enough, let Mom and Dad use their savings to fund your silly dream.
I'm from Denmark, one of the richest countries in the world and we don't have an academy like that.

Our best players have to go to italy, Spain, Germany etc. Parents either have money or borrow. Rune's parents sold their summerhouse to afford his last junior years. My wife is from Serbia and I know the Djokovic family borrowed money from the mafia to sent him to an academy in Germany.

If we go outside the western world we don't see any Africans and very few asians players. No money, no academy, no coaches, no fysio's and the list goes on.

In badminton we have a totally different system. The price money players earn goes to the union and the clubs. It means Denmark has won 19 out of 19 European champignonships for Men and 15 out of 19 for women. You only get these statistics because the system works. After some time the best players offen move to another country at some point in their career to earn more money.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
KSA is paying one billion for just one ATP Master's and a seat at the table. Just don't go into business, promise!

And the top 30 ATP players have to play at Master's events. They are not free to go anywhere at that time.

The players are supposed to be independent contractors. Free to play anywhere they choose.

In any case, $1 Billion is a reasonable starting point offer for ATP (ATP only, not WTA). Certainly nothing more than $1.5 Billion.
Why? Because these ATP Masters 1000 events are not all that profitable. There are many expenses involved. And unlike other sports the TV viewership is very limited.



If they choose to follow the ATP guidelines. But nothing is preventing KSA from hosting a $100 million January tournament in Riyadh during AO.
And hopefully these independent contractor players will be free to choose where they play. A win-win for all.
 
Top