I would like to have a list of drills to work with a hitting partner. Like one player hits CC only while the other hits DTL only. Or one hits CC and every 3rd ball DTL, the other hits CC only.
Please add more.
Get ready to be attacked harshly!I've seen "drills" in ping-pong 30 years ago. Somebody wanted to do drills. I don't do drills. I just play a game. THE thing with ping-pong and tennis is that everything is constantly changing from: left to right, near to far, high to low, slow to fast, and everything in between. The GAME is the game of CHANGE. Drilling is doing something that is fixed in a game of CHANGE. I don't believe in drilling in ping-pong or tennis.
I've seen "drills" in ping-pong 30 years ago. Somebody wanted to do drills. I don't do drills. I just play a game. THE thing with ping-pong and tennis is that everything is constantly changing from: left to right, near to far, high to low, slow to fast, and everything in between. The GAME is the game of CHANGE. Drilling is doing something that is fixed in a game of CHANGE. I don't believe in drilling in ping-pong or tennis.
I've seen "drills" in ping-pong 30 years ago. Somebody wanted to do drills. I don't do drills. I just play a game. THE thing with ping-pong and tennis is that everything is constantly changing from: left to right, near to far, high to low, slow to fast, and everything in between. The GAME is the game of CHANGE. Drilling is doing something that is fixed in a game of CHANGE. I don't believe in drilling in ping-pong or tennis.
I strongly believe in progressions and acquiring a new skill with various means. In tennis, that could range from shadow swing to drop feed to easy feed to challenging feed to live ball rallies. I think I would benefit from all of them, not just one.
If a new skill is so far above my head that I'm completely failing at it using a more advanced scenario, scaling it back to a simpler one is the way to go, not make me do more of something that I obviously can't currently manage.
You want to go from point A to point Z in one step; if that works for you, fine. It doesn't work for me [and when I tutor math, it doesn't work for my students either].
You completely miss my point. But since you teach math, I'll teach you math. In the video above, I count about 12 forehands in the 1st "drill". There are 2 base possibilities: forehand or backhand. 2^12 = 4,096. What she is doing in drilling forehands is something very unrealistic in a real game. That's 1/4,096 that it will be that way in a real game. That's about 0%. I KNEW that she will miss her first backhand in a real game. Drilling a fixed thing doesn't work in a game of CHANGE.
I've seen "drills" in ping-pong 30 years ago. Somebody wanted to do drills. I don't do drills. I just play a game. THE thing with ping-pong and tennis is that everything is constantly changing from: left to right, near to far, high to low, slow to fast, and everything in between. The GAME is the game of CHANGE. Drilling is doing something that is fixed in a game of CHANGE. I don't believe in drilling in ping-pong or tennis.
Why do you argue? Seriously. Why don't you try to understand?I know my powers of 2. However, you completely miss MY point. I don't view these drills as mathematical exercises; I view them as progressions toward mastering a skill. You think drills are useless; I think they are useful.
Your math example is predicated on the assumption that for the drill to have any relevance, a match sequence must be the same as the practice sequence [12 FHs in a row]. I don't agree. Even if she only gets one FH during the match, the fact that she practiced it using various drills means she's better prepared to handle whatever arises in a match.
If the "12 FHs in a row" was the only drill she did, I'd agree that would be foolish. However, I doubt that's the case.
So how about the 2nd video ["Triangle of Death"]?
Why do you argue? Seriously. Why don't you try to understand?
I hate warm ups. When I warm up with a friend, he always tell tell me, "Hit it TO me." That doesn't make sense. Why would I hit it TO you, when the point of the game is to hit it AWAY from you?
What is the point of a drill, that I hit a ball TO a place for you to drill? I'm not going to hit a ball TO you EVER. Maybe AT you, but not TO you.
Well said. I think we are dealing here with a grumpy person who is venting some emotions than thoughts. No offence.Warmups make sense because it's a chance to get used to tracking the ball which is pretty different from normal every day life activities. It also gives your muscles a chance to get going so you don't tear anything. If you hit the ball away from someone this will not allow you to get in as many reps hitting the ball in warmup. Your entire argument in this thread makes very little sense. Do you think the best tennis players on earth don't do drills?
Your entire argument in this thread makes very little sense. Do you think the best tennis players on earth don't do drills?
What is the BEST car in the world? A Lamborghini or a Toyota a Corrolla?
Why do you argue? Seriously. Why don't you try to understand?
I hate warm ups. When I warm up with a friend, he always tell tell me, "Hit it TO me." That doesn't make sense. Why would I hit it TO you, when the point of the game is to hit it AWAY from you?
What is the point of a drill, that I hit a ball TO a place for you to drill? I'm not going to hit a ball TO you EVER. Maybe AT you, but not TO you.
That is a great question. I KNOW yo'll are not smart enough to ASK the question, let alone ANSWER the question. So I'll answer it for you. The Corrolla. Drilling is a very artificial thing. The Lamborghini is a very artificial car, that comes at great cost. So does being "the best" tennis players in the world, it's a very artificial thing that comes at a great cost, money-wise and personally.
2:00 to 2:17
Brother of TTPS. Nuf said.Why are you being so combative man?
Many players make one mistake when they do this drill. It is when the LL player tries to keep the CC player in the rally or when the CC puts the LL under pressure with angles.One of the best drills in my opinion, as it works on most shots in a baseline exchange and also on footwork and coditioning, so great drill overall.
One player plays CC shots all the time, while the 2nd player plays only DDL.
After a while they switch.
So player A plays CC FH.
Player B plays FH ddl.
Player A runs to his BH and hits a BH CC.
Player B runs to his BH and plays BH ddl.
Player A runs to his FH and hits FH CC...
Repating the same pattern.
Many players make one mistake when they do this drill. It is when the LL player tries to keep the CC player in the rally or when the CC puts the LL under pressure with angles.
Even more compact: the outside-in guy (OIG) should be able to generate "good" racquet head speed.Why is that a mistake? Assuming that CC guy isn't taking DTL guy way outside the sideline every time, such variety is good because it's exactly what you will face during a match.