Wow, you are either a troll or just not reading quite well.
(100 +- 2) mph, obviously.
Oh, and you totally ignored my message to post useless stuff.
Good job.
I'm impatient when people ask stupid things. Especially when the things asked were:
1) Addressed in a rather comprehensive review accessible on TW
2) Discussed and addressed in multiple threads, with multiple pages and a few people have already provided their experiences with the Sensor.
3) Presenting a stupid scenario. If my reading says 100mph, how the hell am I supposed to know if the serve was either 90 or 110? If I know what the sensor isn't telling me, why would I need the sensor in the first place?
4) You further questioned it after another poster in the same thread, it's even on the same page, have said that the readings are accurate.
Since your posts were primarily useless, you asked the accuracy question more than once after more than one poster have confirmed with you. I don't think my post was useless. If anything, it highlighted how irrelevant your stupid questions were simply because you were too lazy to do a little digging, or just spend 10 minutes to watch a review of a product you're interested in. So yes, I do think I've done a great job at pointing out how irrelevant your question was. Can I get a high five for giving you a taste of your own medicine?
Maybe you aren't reading quite well? I mean, two people on this page alone have already said it's accurate. Maybe the next time TT has an update, they can incorporate a highlighting feature specifically for you?
Got anymore dumba** questions? Or have we not been clear enough for you. Do you want to know the significant figures for the MPH readings? It goes up to 3 sig figs. And yes, if the screen says 70mph, it's probably 70mph. Just like how when your speedometer says 70mph, you're probably going at 70mph. Not 68/72.
Am I still a "troll" for providing you with such an elaborate answer? This is probably the 3rd time the MPH accuracy have been answered.