He mentioned they are on lock down again so he’s trying different content, at least in one of his last videos. Sign of the times globally.So Tennis Nerd's new idea is just him scrolling through the tennis warehouse website...
Still is helpful content for a lot people....So Tennis Nerd's new idea is just him scrolling through the tennis warehouse website...
So what should he do, your ideas please? When you're a 'Youtuber', the pressure to constantly come up with new videos, new ideas, new content is immense. I subscribe to a few channels, not just tennis ones, and the people who do these videos comment on sometimes it can be difficult to think up new things. All the time they're being bashed in the comments by keyboard critics.So Tennis Nerd's new idea is just him scrolling through the tennis warehouse website...
I think he should probably just quit. How much can we discuss racquets?So what should he do, your ideas please? When you're a 'Youtuber', the pressure to constantly come up with new videos, new ideas, new content is immense. I subscribe to a few channels, not just tennis ones, and the people who do these videos comment on sometimes it can be difficult to think up new things. All the time they're being bashed in the comments by keyboard critics.
I'll look forward to your Youtube channel starting up and all your original content, day in day out, week in week out, 52 weeks of of the year . . . . .
I think he should probably just quit. How much can we discuss racquets?
Underneath your Username tag thingy, it gives a word/phrase depending on how much you've posted previously. Yours says 'Semi-Pro' . . . . You tell us, how much CAN you discuss racquets?I think he should probably just quit. How much can we discuss racquets?
On his website he cites this forum quite often. He gives thanks to Dr325i mainly for his knowledge on Head racquets.Sorry but there actually is a moral dilemma in TennisNerd content : making profit with other's free knowledge without citing them.
I am not OK with that.
It doesn't complicate your content to just cite your sources.
TW does not ask their affiliates to do anything. All the affiliates do is review racquets they have interest in and add the affiliate link.Considering he recently became a TW affiliate, don't you think it is possible that TW asked him to do this? For those who think he is out of ideas, I have access to his Patreon page (a friend of mine is a patron), and he is for sure not out of ideas. He just doesn't have enough court time to test and film them yet (just saw a very interesting racquet that would definitely spark discussion here).
I think he should probably just quit. How much can we discuss racquets?
It's very recent, and it's far from often.On his website he cites this forum quite often. He gives thanks to Dr325i mainly for his knowledge on Head racquets.
I 100% agree w you.I see I'm getting some push-back for criticising the guy for literally filming himself scrolling tennis warehouse website saying 'this racquet is powerful' 'that racquet is less powerful'. Jesus Christ.
Yeah it is only in recent times that he has given credit where it's due, because he was under pressure from posters on his social media accounts about copying content from here. It was obvious what he was / is doing.
I lost trust to the most YouTube reviewers out there after the fiasco with latest Vcore line. That amazing racquet that shines and does most of the stuff well at 95 and 98inches. One of the c r apiest sticks i ve ever played with. I don’t blame the YouTubers for taking money under the table in order to promote stuff. I just call them bad at what they are doing.... they just don’t get it. To be fair TennisNerd is the best among those youtubers that criticise sticks from a more generic point of view. He is spot on and pretty much gets it right. You have to consider that he is more into heavier frames in terms of static weight and classic feel.... he also has a sensitive elbow so he prefers and uses softer polys. If you consider his personal taste he is pretty good from a general point of view.
I follow pretty much every YouTube reviewer out there. If i want a more in death review my favourite is AC Tennis:
-Another great reviewer is Tennis Family and the french guy team tennis.
-As for tennis lessons ONLY feel tennis instruction.
-For shoes: foot doctor
-For written reviews: the bros brothers and tennis taste.
I lost trust to the most YouTube reviewers out there after the fiasco with latest Vcore line. That amazing racquet that shines and does most of the stuff well at 95 and 98inches. One of the c r apiest sticks i ve ever played with. I don’t blame the YouTubers for taking money under the table in order to promote stuff. I just call them bad at what they are doing.... they just don’t get it. To be fair TennisNerd is the best among those youtubers that criticise sticks from a more generic point of view. He is spot on and pretty much gets it right. You have to consider that he is more into heavier frames in terms of static weight and classic feel.... he also has a sensitive elbow so he prefers and uses softer polys. If you consider his personal taste he is pretty good from a general point of view.
I follow pretty much every YouTube reviewer out there. If i want a more in death review my favourite is AC Tennis:
-Another great reviewer is Tennis Family and the french guy team tennis.
-As for tennis lessons ONLY feel tennis instruction.
-For shoes: foot doctor
-For written reviews: the bros brothers and tennis taste.
He does a fantastic job with his reviews, the depth and detail are solid. I've played with the PS97CV for a while now and his analysis on it was perfect.my favourite is AC Tennis
Even on these geek infested boards, a lot of people say racquet line ups are confusing. Along those lines, going through each manufacturer’s offerings with brief, comparative explanations seems like a direct response to feedback. TW has been doing more of that, too, in their own videos.
He has a STATED relationship/sponsorship with Tennis Warehouse. Using the links to TW in the description gives him a small kickback. Do people even watch the videos they criticize?Sorry but there actually is a moral dilemma in TennisNerd content : making profit with other's free knowledge without citing them.
I am not OK with that.
It doesn't complicate your content to just cite your sources.
If people on these or any other boards are that concerned with credit (and accountability) they should use their real names. Criticizing someone for not citing a source who chooses to remain anonymous is absurd.
Hey, I’m a TN fan, not the one complaining about him. I didn’t miss anything. He has for a long time referenced message boards and the like even before giving specific screen names. I don’t think him citing screen names is even necessary. My point is that screen names function to maintain anonymity, so complaining that “anonymous” wasn’t given proper credit is silly. Besides all that, I’ve seen lots of people recycle information on these boards to the point that the original source was lost years ago. Much of it falls into a general knowledge category or is subjective anyway.Whats equally absurd is you missed where it was mentioned here that TN DOES now acknowledge some posters here by their screen names.
The only thing I don’t like about him is he’ll put out a review when a racquet first comes out and his opinion changes based on the popular opinion of others. He didn’t mention the comfort of the ezone tour until after people complained about it.
The best thing about him is when he reviews older or discontinued racquets like the c10 or IG radical pro. The other Utubers won’t do this. He even reviewed the entire six one line after it had been discontinued.
Yeah I like his content, can't hate on someone who shows his passion for things I also have a passion for.
The only thing I don't like about his videos is that I don't like watching his groundstrokes But that's of course just me thinking selfishly. It's just one of the thing's I love about Karue's videos in that I really like watching him hit his backhand and forehand especially.
+1!!Karue is a gift from the tennis gods.
LOLWhy are you on a tennis discussion board? Lol
I picked up IG Radical Pro on the back of his vid. Very happy with this stick.The only thing I don’t like about him is he’ll put out a review when a racquet first comes out and his opinion changes based on the popular opinion of others. He didn’t mention the comfort of the ezone tour until after people complained about it.
The best thing about him is when he reviews older or discontinued racquets like the c10 or IG radical pro. The other Utubers won’t do this. He even reviewed the entire six one line after it had been discontinued.
The only thing I don't like about his videos is that I don't like watching his groundstrokes
He's improved a ton. Not bad to watch now, but his early videos were rough.
Karue is a gift from the tennis gods.
He's improved a ton. Not bad to watch now, but his early videos were rough.