He indeed serves out the bagel,As a Nadal fan, voted Rome for the sigh of relief factor
Monte Carlo was just as bad, if not worse. Djokovic-Medvedev was the only decent match.Rome or Madrid clearly. Rome had incredible matches like Djokovic/Del Potro and Djokovic/Schwartzman. Madrid was great too with Tsitsipas/Nadal, Federer/Thiem, Thiem/Djokovic. Other masters were poor I found except Miami with Shapovalov/Tsitsipas. Canada was clearly the poorest.
Monte Carlo had some drama at least with Fognini taking out Nadal, whereas Montreal was just boring.Monte Carlo was just as bad, if not worse. Djokovic-Medvedev was the only decent match.
And LOL about Tsitsipas-Nadal being a great match in Madrid. Extremely low quality.
I know, Federer trolls really enjoy it when Nadal plays the worst tennis of his career. I also can say Cincinnati was great because Rublev schooled a terrible playing Federer.Monte Carlo had some drama at least with Fognini taking out Nadal, whereas Montreal was just boring.
I didn’t say the match was great, I said it had a surprise which made it better than Montreal where there were no good matches and no upset. And it’s not because I have Federer as my profile photo that I’m an absolute Fedfan. I appreciate Rafa too and as you can see I put Rome as the best Masters and he won it, not MiamiI know, Federer trolls really enjoy it when Nadal plays the worst tennis of his career. I also can say Cincinnati was great because Rublev schooled a terrible playing Federer.