Lew II
G.O.A.T.
He was #6 for the Ballon d'Or
Last edited:
He was #6 for the Ballon d'Or
Yeah if this were the 2000s Fed would be the uncontested #1 of the lot, but in the 2010s it should be Djokovic at #1 or even Nadal depending on how much weight you put on his RG dominance.Should be the opposite order...
Only reason people don't unanimously go Messi Goat goes by the name of Gonzalo Higuain, who's funnily now Ronaldo's teammateDo you truly believe that? It takes a little more than googling the scoring stats to judge who was a better performer, and we know which one is so much more than those numbers.
There is Leo, and then there is everyone else. As far as the last three decades are concerned at least.
He was #6 for the Ballon d'Or
They were teammates for a few years before that screw up too. Suspicious for sure...Only reason people don't unanimously go Messi Goat goes by the name of Gonzalo Higuain, who's funnily now Ronaldo's teammate
Nadal secured already 159 Weeks at 1 in this decade.Most dominant athletes of the decade has ranked Fed 4th, Rafa 10th and Djoker 15th
Slams this decade:
Djoker 15
Rafa 13
Fed 5
YE # 1 this decade:
Djoker 5
Rafa 4
Fed 0
Weeks at # 1 this decade:
Djoker 275
Rafa 155
Fed 48
WTF this decade:
Djoker 4
Fed 2
Rafa 0
M1000 this decade:
Djoker 29
Rafa 19
Fed 12
Makes perfect sense
Imo both Djokovic and Nadal should make top 10... Rafa was the most succesful mannin 2 slam venues... 8/10 RG and 4/10 US open and Wimbledon title too. 4/10YE1 is huge, and the fact that djokovic won even more speaka great of djoko performance and doesnt hurt Rafa one, with 13 slams and 4ye1 you would have been #1 in most of other decades. He also lost 4 finals in Australia and 2 yec, incouding USo and wimby finals (and we could even include 2018 wim sf as a final)I am actually not sure on Phelps (although he still should be far higher than Federer, and possibly over any tennis player for the decade). His dominance was much greater in the 2000s. He was actually only the best swimmer in maybe 2 years- 2016 and 2012, the 2 Olympic years, and I would even probably say it was Sun Yang in 2012. Lochte was far and away the best in 2010 and 2011, close to the best in 2012, and arguably the best in 2013. Amazingly he might even have a cast for best swimmer of the decade over Phelps, although with the importance of the Olympics and Phelps clearly doing better there (by a huge margin in 2016) it is probably him. Still I wouldn't have him at the very top for the decade. As you can tell I do have interest in Olympic sports, haha.
Biles, Bolt, and Brady clearly the Top 3 IMO. Someone like LeBron James probably after that. Djokovic somewhere in the Top 10 or Top 15 I guess, and Nadal somewhere in the Top 41 list (no idea where). Federer not even making the list most likely. given all that athletes and that he was a very distant 3rd best of the decade in his own sport.
Most people outside of the US dont give a damn about basketball . Tennis is way bigger sport globally, only football is bigger.LeBron is undoubtedly #1 but the rest of the list is a complete joke. Fed's entry reads like a parody making fun of maestronians.
Most people outside of the US dont give a damn about basketball . Tennis is way bigger sport globally, only football is bigger.
Dumb af and not just the tennis part of it...Kershaw 10 spots higher than Trout is also just madness lol.
Sport popularity has nothing to do with the premise of the list. LeBron is the only choice for most dominant athlete of the decade in the sports world. No one comes close to matching his level of consistency and excellence throughout the decade. He entered the decade as arguably the best player in his sport, will leave the decade holding the same distinction and never took a one second break. The Olympians can't match the same year-in, year-out dominance from 2010-2019, nor can anyone else.
As an aside, yes basketball is more popular than tennis globally and growing faster too. It is far more popular in China, Philippines and other far Eastern countries. Revenues and ratings support this.
France won the World Cup, not Mbappe.He made France world champions. An honour (to make his country world champions) that Messi (this year's Ballon d'Or winner and a total of 6 times winner) will never have in his lifetime. In short, oldies are going to old.
Cristiano (aged 33) scored as many goals (4) as Mbappé in the 2018 World Cup and playing less matches. Cristiano did not win the World Cup because Portugal is a weak team, but his individual performance was even superior to Mbappé, as he scored the same number of goals with a better ratio.He made France world champions. An honour (to make his country world champions) that Messi (this year's Ballon d'Or winner and a total of 6 times winner) will never have in his lifetime. In short, oldies are going to old.
Mbappé won it as well as all the components of the French team. But that is not the point. Cristiano scored as many goals as him in the 2018 WC and played even less matches. So in terms of individual performance in the WC, Cristiano >>> Mbappé.France won the World Cup, not Mbappe.
Yeah, no way Mbappe is the best in the world.Mbappé won it as well as all the components of the French team. But that is not the point. Cristiano scored as many goals as him in the 2018 WC and played even less matches. So in terms of individual performance in the WC, Cristiano >>> Mbappé.
France won the World Cup, not Mbappe.
Send a letter to Ballon d'Or.Yes, and Mbappe was instrumental in that win. Just how Messi should have been for Argentina. Alas, it is not meant to be for "the best" and an "oldie"
Send a letter to Ballon d'Or.
Nzonzi > MessiI don't need to. Your argument failed.
Nzonzi > Messi
He won the World Cup.
Impact is subjective, bro.Didn't realise that Nzonzi had the same impact on France's game as Mbappe.
Impact is subjective, bro.
I'm happy you think Mbappe is the best in the world. I disagree, and Ballon d'Or commision is with me.
Who got this baby (which, by the way, is the most prestigious title in Football):
Look here:
Congratulations. You won the debate.@Tennis_Hands
World Cup is the biggest team award.
Ballon d'Or is the biggest individual award.
Mbappe won the World Cup with a team.
Messi won the Ballon d'Or alone.
Simple.
This is an acceptable argumentation, unlike the previous.France was the shared 2nd/3rd youngest team at the World Cup in 2018.
On the other hand, Argentina was the third oldest.
Do you truly believe that? It takes a little more than googling the scoring stats to judge who was a better performer, and we know which one is so much more than those numbers.
There is Leo, and then there is everyone else. As far as the last three decades are concerned at least.
It's a typo, was meant to deciment. To win 1 in 10. Out of 40 Majors Fed got 5 or 1 : 8. That's better deciment than Nole or Rafa.Most dominant athletes of the decade has ranked Fed 4th, Rafa 10th and Djoker 15th
Slams this decade:
Djoker 15
Rafa 13
Fed 5
YE # 1 this decade:
Djoker 5
Rafa 4
Fed 0
Weeks at # 1 this decade:
Djoker 275
Rafa 155
Fed 48
WTF this decade:
Djoker 4
Fed 2
Rafa 0
M1000 this decade:
Djoker 29
Rafa 19
Fed 12
Makes perfect sense
The repetition of your post shows that you are at a dead end, but it reminded me of something else. Since your argument was about the place of the oldies and you keep bringing up the rest of the France's team:
France was the shared 2nd/3rd youngest team at the World Cup in 2018.
On the other hand, Argentina was the third oldest.
Ouch.
He made France world champions. An honour (to make his country world champions) that Messi (this year's Ballon d'Or winner and a total of 6 times winner) will never have in his lifetime. In short, oldies are going to old.
Congratulations. You won the debate.
And Griezmann was their best player in the WC. This is backed by stats, not just my opinion.
Lol come on now. You can't be seriously arguing that Fed was better than Djokodal this decade when he was clearly third best.It's called reality.
It's the way the world views the tennis scene and the players in it.
I'm sorry if this disappoints you.
Just another example of complete ignorance about sport among many Americans.
Honestly we - Iranians - love football as much as Europeans and South Americans.And that on a tennis forum, all the Europeans and South Americans want to talk about is soccer .. which the rest of the world has little interest in.
The whole world minus the US follow it.
I didn't say you wereI'm not from the US
This is an acceptable argumentation, unlike the previous.
Would you be upset or care if it was the opposite for previous decade of this century?Imagine actually being upset by this.
La Pulga is way too loyal to his home to be bothered by some arbitrary challengers from the doubters. Besides, he actually did more damage against the best English teams than that other one guy, despite never playing in England himself.At least one of them has challenged himself going to England, Italy and Spain to play, which hes winning titles and accolades. Along with international honours.
Im pretty sure if Messi went to England, he would be half the player he is in Spain.
It doesn't matter who was the youngest TEAM. You replied to the Ballon d'or comment, of the last 4 winners being over 30, with a caption of Mbappe LOL .
Once again, another pointless post.
I agree with most of your points. What I find even stranger while talking about dominance is how dominantly US Professional Leagues are present is almost all of those lists.For me, although I have very little interest in the Olympics, it's:
1. Bolt
2. Phelps
End of list.
Those two men dominated their popular respective sports for the decade. If you have two or more people from the same sport, then no-one dominated. If it's a team sport, then they have to basically carry their team and win everything. I don't really follow basketball, but perhaps James could sneak into third sport, but that's about it. Including anyone else means you aren't really taking about domination.
And I don’t mean that as an offense to any fan of American Football or so, but how can anyone talk about this as a serious international sport with top athletes comparable to Bolt or Phelps?