The big 3 have 0 non-asterisk slams

[ActualTennisPlayer]

2003-2007: vacuum era, slams don’t count.
2008: Fed had mono, slams don’t count
2009: Rafa was injured and Novak was sad from his 2008 losses, slams don’t count
2010: Fed was old and Novak was eating bread, slams don’t count
2011: Fed was old and Rafa lost a step, slams don’t count
2012-2013: Murray won slams - weak era confirmed, slams don’t count
2014: cilic won a slam - weak era confirmed, slams don’t count
2015-2016: Fed was old, Rafa injured and Murray/wawrinka are non-ATGs, slams don’t count
2017-mid2018: djokovic was injured, slams don’t count
Mid 2018-2023: career inflation, vulturing and weak era, slams don’t count

 

[RS]

I don't believe in a asterisk slam. Context debates on them sure though but it's getting near useless

 

[GabeT]

I don’t believe in slams

 

[Federer and Del Potro]

Really just reaffirms what we already knew - Tomas Berdych is level with the Big 3.

 

[Bender]

Really just reaffirms what already knew - Pete Sampras is the real GOAT.

 

[Backspin1183]

Really just reaffirms what we already knew - Tomas Berdych is level with the Big 3.

Hope you'll be rooting for new Berdych today.

 

[Federer and Del Potro]

Hope you'll be rooting for new Berdych today.

Negative.

 

[Hitman]

Really just reaffirms what already knew - Pete Sampras is the real GOAT.

Yeah, but can he stop a chainsaw with his bare hands like Chuck?