*** The Gamma Quadrant *** (fan club)
- Thread starter canadave
- Start date
GoDawgs2011
New User
New Racquet: 330x with Blue Gear at 58
Previous Racquet: Yonex RDS 001 MP (2006 version) with ALU Rough at 56
Power: 330x significantly - sometimes gets me into trouble so not always a good thing but generally my shots definitely have more pace.
Spin: 330x ever so slightly - a surprise given how tight the string pattern gets in the middle of the head (unusual for a 16x18 string pattern) and the 95 in head.
Directional control: 330x slightly - good with both, but 330x seems slightly better. Whether its true or not, I'm going to say its cause the 330x plays like a more flexible racquet than the RDS.
Depth Control: Even - more likely to hit out with the 330x but less likely to leave short.
Comfort: 330x significantly - I love playing with poly strings and although I had never experienced a problem with tennis elbow before, shots at the top of the hoop on the RDS 001 can be slightly painful - generally, have not felt any such issues with 330x.
Serve: 330x slightly - a bit more pop and more movement.
Touch: RDS 001 by a bit - can't seem to hit a nice drop shot with the 330x - the strings might have something to do with it though as BG isn't exactly known for its touch.
Volleys: Jury is still out - haven't played with it enough.
In conclusion, the 330x has won the starting job and the RDS is now sitting on the bench and I am proud new member of the Gamma Quadrant!
Previous Racquet: Yonex RDS 001 MP (2006 version) with ALU Rough at 56
Power: 330x significantly - sometimes gets me into trouble so not always a good thing but generally my shots definitely have more pace.
Spin: 330x ever so slightly - a surprise given how tight the string pattern gets in the middle of the head (unusual for a 16x18 string pattern) and the 95 in head.
Directional control: 330x slightly - good with both, but 330x seems slightly better. Whether its true or not, I'm going to say its cause the 330x plays like a more flexible racquet than the RDS.
Depth Control: Even - more likely to hit out with the 330x but less likely to leave short.
Comfort: 330x significantly - I love playing with poly strings and although I had never experienced a problem with tennis elbow before, shots at the top of the hoop on the RDS 001 can be slightly painful - generally, have not felt any such issues with 330x.
Serve: 330x slightly - a bit more pop and more movement.
Touch: RDS 001 by a bit - can't seem to hit a nice drop shot with the 330x - the strings might have something to do with it though as BG isn't exactly known for its touch.
Volleys: Jury is still out - haven't played with it enough.
In conclusion, the 330x has won the starting job and the RDS is now sitting on the bench and I am proud new member of the Gamma Quadrant!
canadave
Professional
welcome aboard, GD! And glad to see a fellow 330X user! 
I agree with just about everything you wrote, particularly the comfort and spin. I get ridiculous spin on this thing with poly strings. This year is winding down, but next year I'm going to try the VS/Hurricane hybrid and see how that works.
I agree with just about everything you wrote, particularly the comfort and spin. I get ridiculous spin on this thing with poly strings. This year is winding down, but next year I'm going to try the VS/Hurricane hybrid and see how that works.
meowmix
Hall of Fame
I'm now petitioning for full membership. I've gone back to my Ipex 7.0 MP... I just couldn't serve or volley with any of my other rackets. This, strung with revenge at 55, is a racket that, despite being none too excited about how the racket feels (slightly tinny) is giving me the best results. Plan to sell off a lot of the stuff I have.
JackB1
G.O.A.T.
did u find the T-7 a lot more powerful than the MPro 98? did they both have the same "buttery smooth" feel?
I wouldn't say "a lot" more powerful, no. But I do find the Fischer to be "softer" (which, I suppose, might indicate more ball absorption / lower power).
Both are excellent racquets. I heard one person describe the T-7 as a low-powered tweener racquet. I don't really think that's true. It definitely is a player's frame in that it requires you to generate your own power. I think it's a rare "player's frame" in 100sq inches.
My only major issue with it was weight (I like heavier) and head size (I like slightly smaller). The Fischer M Pro One 98 fit the bill on both counts.
Both are great racquets though!
Hoping to Duplicate Tradition 20 XL Characteristics
Many, many years ago, having my worst case ever of tennis elbow (result of using cheap racquets/no research), I happened across a racquet ratings piece in a now obsolete tennis publication which extolled the virtues of this racquet pertaining to the Shock Suppression System (SST) and the overall playability characteristics. It "sounded" right to me and I immediately obtained a local demo, played with it for three days without pain - and it fit my game to boot! Ordered two and a while later decided to look into getting more and discovered they were no longer available. Undaunted (and loving the stick), I managed to find two (used) on a popular site. Have used 'em ever since (a LONG time) and now two are retired (cracked frames) and the other two are gracefully aging faster than me!
Can any of you folks help me come close to duplicating the characteristics of my favorite racquet in something contemporary? I really want to be loyal to Gamma but am not sure that's possible. I did see the Gamma e-address earlier in this thread and will contact them as well. Thanks in advance!
Many, many years ago, having my worst case ever of tennis elbow (result of using cheap racquets/no research), I happened across a racquet ratings piece in a now obsolete tennis publication which extolled the virtues of this racquet pertaining to the Shock Suppression System (SST) and the overall playability characteristics. It "sounded" right to me and I immediately obtained a local demo, played with it for three days without pain - and it fit my game to boot! Ordered two and a while later decided to look into getting more and discovered they were no longer available. Undaunted (and loving the stick), I managed to find two (used) on a popular site. Have used 'em ever since (a LONG time) and now two are retired (cracked frames) and the other two are gracefully aging faster than me!
Can any of you folks help me come close to duplicating the characteristics of my favorite racquet in something contemporary? I really want to be loyal to Gamma but am not sure that's possible. I did see the Gamma e-address earlier in this thread and will contact them as well. Thanks in advance!
Last edited:
canadave
Professional
Frank: see my post in this thread from September 9:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=3907224&postcount=80
The Gamma person was answering my question about tournament sticks specifically, but I imagine the answer applies to Gamma racquets in general.
thanks a lot. in fact, im very interested by the T-7 but i wonder if i should wait and see if they come out with new sticks soon.
Any chance these sticks are presented soon or leaked like the wilson blx or youtek prestige?
crazyups
Professional
Looks like I'm joining this club. I've been playing 2 weeks with the 320x and it's my favorite stick. 12.2 ounces and 6 light with pacific polyforce xtreme and a good amount of lead. No weaknesses yet but I still have to play a heavy hitter to finish my analysis. I also have a yonex rdis 100mid but it weighs 349 grams/12.3 ounces which isn't that much more but it's a bit harder to play with, but still very nice too. There aren't any current 95-98 square inch sticks with a 66-67 stifness rating except kblade 98 and it's not very customizable.
crazyups
Professional
And a 20mm or less beam.
meowmix
Hall of Fame
If you're interested in some, you can still find them today. They pop up every now and then on the bay and in the FS section. TW had a few for sale about a year ago. I believe the Gamma Ipex 7.0 OS was meant to be a replacement (if I remember correctly, the Trad 20 was a 110cm2, 12 ounce racket?)
Never thought I'd say this:
I used Fischers for years. I loved them. I just started hitting with the Gamma T6 about a month ago. Same head shape and similar beam width to the pro 1. LOVE IT. More pop than most Fischers, pretty stable, nice nice hitting frame. happy to join the quadrant!
I used Fischers for years. I loved them. I just started hitting with the Gamma T6 about a month ago. Same head shape and similar beam width to the pro 1. LOVE IT. More pop than most Fischers, pretty stable, nice nice hitting frame. happy to join the quadrant!
I've come around to Gamma in a big way recently. I first bought a T-7 based on all the great reviews here. I love it, and think the power level is perfect.
Then last month I found a couple G310s online, and snatched those up in a hurry since they've been discontinued. It's almost identical to the T-7, spec-wise: same head size with a different shape, same weight/balance, slightly stiffer.
And today, my brand-new G325 arrived in the mail. It didn't take long practicing serves this evening to figure out what all the G325 fuss is about. No wonder it's so hard to find despite being a relatively recent frame. Gamma should reissue this one, or just take the mold, add a new paint job and give it a new name.
Then last month I found a couple G310s online, and snatched those up in a hurry since they've been discontinued. It's almost identical to the T-7, spec-wise: same head size with a different shape, same weight/balance, slightly stiffer.
And today, my brand-new G325 arrived in the mail. It didn't take long practicing serves this evening to figure out what all the G325 fuss is about. No wonder it's so hard to find despite being a relatively recent frame. Gamma should reissue this one, or just take the mold, add a new paint job and give it a new name.
That's close; the Tradition 20 OS head size is 107.
Completely off subject . . . we have an old cat (inherited from our grandson) which has subsisted on Meow Mix forever!
ced
Professional
Hi Dave ..... can I get back in ?
I picked up a T-7 off the TT board the other day and gave it its first hit this morning ....... got home and ordered a second (new) for Xmas (a gift from my wife).
The flex and feel of the T-7 was something that I just had to try again. I know I raved about the 330X, but I also never really forgave Gamma for adding the stiffness they did. At my age the flex, feel and head-size of the T-7 provide me with the best racquet choice I can find today.
Charlie
Consider yourself a full card-carrying member!
I picked up a T-7 off the TT board the other day and gave it its first hit this morning ....... got home and ordered a second (new) for Xmas (a gift from my wife).
The flex and feel of the T-7 was something that I just had to try again. I know I raved about the 330X, but I also never really forgave Gamma for adding the stiffness they did. At my age the flex, feel and head-size of the T-7 provide me with the best racquet choice I can find today.
Charlie
i played with my t-7 for the first time this week
i put put 16 gr of lead tape on it and it's awesome.
the best racquet ive ever hit with. I hve the feeling i can swing very hard and the ball always finds the court. Very good control.
im glad i bought two more new ones. These will be my sticks of choice
i string it with sp tornado 1.30mm at 63 lbs. It's perfect
i put put 16 gr of lead tape on it and it's awesome.
the best racquet ive ever hit with. I hve the feeling i can swing very hard and the ball always finds the court. Very good control.
im glad i bought two more new ones. These will be my sticks of choice
i string it with sp tornado 1.30mm at 63 lbs. It's perfect
canadave
Professional
hehe Charlie....I don't really post much on this forum any more (a disagreement with the management), but I will say this: I consider you a founding member of the Gamma Quadrant, since it was largely your review that convinced ME to buy a Gamma 330X! I'm buying another 330X in the new year to match my other one
Glad you're enjoying the T-7....it sounds like a very popular and comfy stick.
Happy Tennis!
I am going to get a T-7 racquet but could one of you guys that have one of these racquets take a measurement for me. I would like someone to measure the length of the longest main string and same with the cross string. What I would like to do is what is in this thread. http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=298443
I will then buy a racquet and have it strung like what they are talking about. Thanks
Donovan
I will then buy a racquet and have it strung like what they are talking about. Thanks
Donovan
ced
Professional
Don't see what the string length has to do with it ...but here they are:
main = 13 3/4, cross = 10 3/4 (measured to the outside of the frame)
By the way I always string mains and crosses at different tension (still can't figure what the string length has to do with this)
.... if a full bed of a multi or gut I will pull the crosses 3-4 lbs tighter than the mains ... if a hybrid I always put the poly in the crosses and pull them 3-4 lbs lower than the mains, with the mains somewhere in the range (depending on the string) of 48-53.Thanks for the measurement. I needed the inside length but that is the same as my daughters Speedport Black so that will work just fine for me. Thanks
The reason for the measuring the length of the string is that a long string will have a different stiffness at a given tension than a short string at the same tension. If you look at the chart the T-7 will have a inside measurement of 33cm on the mains. So if you what a stiffness of 34kg/cm on a string that is 33cm you will need a tension of 55.9lbs. Then if you measure the crosses which is 25cm with a stiffness 34kg/cm the tension will be 54.1lbs. If you want to learn more look up this guy and read all his posts http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/member.php?u=64727
Donovan
The reason for the measuring the length of the string is that a long string will have a different stiffness at a given tension than a short string at the same tension. If you look at the chart the T-7 will have a inside measurement of 33cm on the mains. So if you what a stiffness of 34kg/cm on a string that is 33cm you will need a tension of 55.9lbs. Then if you measure the crosses which is 25cm with a stiffness 34kg/cm the tension will be 54.1lbs. If you want to learn more look up this guy and read all his posts http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/member.php?u=64727
Donovan
ced
Professional
Have a 304X on order .......
Hi Dave, hope you check in and see this ..... I have a 340X on order (should be here in 7-10 days) .... based on what specs I have seen and what little I have heard about it , I am really anxious to give it a try. Hoping this is closer to the G325 than either the T7 or 330X were- if its a little stiffer thats okay - everything else seems pretty close.
hehe Charlie....I don't really post much on this forum any more (a disagreement with the management), but I will say this: I consider you a founding member of the Gamma Quadrant, since it was largely your review that convinced ME to buy a Gamma 330X! I'm buying another 330X in the new year to match my other one
Glad you're enjoying the T-7....it sounds like a very popular and comfy stick.
Happy Tennis!
Hi Dave, hope you check in and see this ..... I have a 340X on order (should be here in 7-10 days) .... based on what specs I have seen and what little I have heard about it , I am really anxious to give it a try. Hoping this is closer to the G325 than either the T7 or 330X were- if its a little stiffer thats okay - everything else seems pretty close.
ced
Professional
340X , first ride ........
I've been waiting since early March to get my hands on Gamma's new 340X, I finally received one yesterday.
Had my first hit with the 340X this morning ....... lasted about 2 hours.
I strung it yesterday with 17ga MSV Soft-Touch (a really nice multi) at 42/46 ....... probably a little lower tension than you would choose, but the 18/20 pattern still provides a firm bed even at those tensions .... great feel on impact, with really nice dwell time.
The 93" head plays like a 95" ...... nice easy to find sweet spot.
Other than the string the only thing I added was a Yonex Supergrap overgrip which brought the total weight to exactly 12oz .......... other than the overgrip everything was out of the box (and will probably stay that way) ..... balance is really nice ... I would say about 6-7 points ....... the beam is smaller than indicated in the Gamma specs )definitely not 22, more like 19 or 20. Flex is a little more than the G325 and T7, but less than the 330X (I'm guessing in the 63-66 range...Gamma only says the flex is medium) and is in my opinion just right.
Play is much like the venerable G325 , but with more 'pop' (which shows up on the serve) ...... feel is plush like the G325 and T7 and power is a little less than the 330X ....... control is excellent.
Slice with a 1hbh is easy and very controllable ... chip and charge play keeps the ball low and where you want it. High backhands are easy with 2hbh, a real power shot.
The 340X was definitely worth the wait (my 2nd one is due 6/8/10) ..... Gamma has really done it right with this stick .........players familiar with the Prestige, Redondo and the POG will really take to the 340X.
I've been waiting since early March to get my hands on Gamma's new 340X, I finally received one yesterday.
Had my first hit with the 340X this morning ....... lasted about 2 hours.
I strung it yesterday with 17ga MSV Soft-Touch (a really nice multi) at 42/46 ....... probably a little lower tension than you would choose, but the 18/20 pattern still provides a firm bed even at those tensions .... great feel on impact, with really nice dwell time.
The 93" head plays like a 95" ...... nice easy to find sweet spot.
Other than the string the only thing I added was a Yonex Supergrap overgrip which brought the total weight to exactly 12oz .......... other than the overgrip everything was out of the box (and will probably stay that way) ..... balance is really nice ... I would say about 6-7 points ....... the beam is smaller than indicated in the Gamma specs )definitely not 22, more like 19 or 20. Flex is a little more than the G325 and T7, but less than the 330X (I'm guessing in the 63-66 range...Gamma only says the flex is medium) and is in my opinion just right.
Play is much like the venerable G325 , but with more 'pop' (which shows up on the serve) ...... feel is plush like the G325 and T7 and power is a little less than the 330X ....... control is excellent.
Slice with a 1hbh is easy and very controllable ... chip and charge play keeps the ball low and where you want it. High backhands are easy with 2hbh, a real power shot.
The 340X was definitely worth the wait (my 2nd one is due 6/8/10) ..... Gamma has really done it right with this stick .........players familiar with the Prestige, Redondo and the POG will really take to the 340X.
I've always liked Gamma racquets and thought they were rather underrated. I loved the T-7, but there was just a little "something" about it that wasn't quite perfect for me. So close, but just not quite.
I suspect that the G325 would be my absolute dream racquet, but I could never pull the trigger on any of the used ones, knowing that I would have a hard time finding backups and grommet sets and what not.
I eventually bought 4 practically brand new Fischer Pro One 98s and stocked up on bumper guards and grommet sets. I've got them leaded the way I like and playing the best tennis of my life.
Would still love to try either a 340x or a 325 one day, but I would have to get lucky and find a local hitting partner who had one, b/c I'm not about to put any money into demoing one or buying a used one. Not with the way I'm currently playing with my Fischers -- if it ain't broke....
The Baseline
Professional
friend of mine has 5 gamma 320x's and to be honest i think these racquets have the best paintjob out of any racquet. The racquet really should be mentioned as one of the best 98s maybe ever because of its spin potential.
It looks nice, but at a stiffness of 67, it just isn't going to have the plush feeling that something like the T-7 or the Fischer Pro One 98 has.
The T-7 stiffness is 57, which is awesome. It's oh so close to perfect. If only it were slightly smaller in head size, and had a higher weight overall. If it was... well, the G325...
snoopy
Professional
I really like the no-nonsense nature of Gamma's frames.
Most are simple straight beams with reasonable beam widths. No frills, no "tech."
The quality is good too. I recently ordered 2 Gamma T-7s and their unstrung, bare handle weights are: 10.547 and 10.557 oz. I don't have a balance board, but I got an approximation for their balances by sticking a pencil through the throat and letting both frames hang. The balances were pretty close, I was pleased.
Most are simple straight beams with reasonable beam widths. No frills, no "tech."
The quality is good too. I recently ordered 2 Gamma T-7s and their unstrung, bare handle weights are: 10.547 and 10.557 oz. I don't have a balance board, but I got an approximation for their balances by sticking a pencil through the throat and letting both frames hang. The balances were pretty close, I was pleased.
Last edited:
ced
Professional
340X Fischer similarities ....
The 340X in some ways reminds me of the Fischer Mag Tour on impact ... like the Fischers most of the flex appears to be in the throat .... the 93" head and 18x20 string pattern do present a firm bed like the Fischers
It looks nice, but at a stiffness of 67, it just isn't going to have the plush feeling that something like the T-7 or the Fischer Pro One 98 has.
The T-7 stiffness is 57, which is awesome. It's oh so close to perfect. If only it were slightly smaller in head size, and had a higher weight overall. If it was... well, the G325...
The 340X in some ways reminds me of the Fischer Mag Tour on impact ... like the Fischers most of the flex appears to be in the throat .... the 93" head and 18x20 string pattern do present a firm bed like the Fischers
rabidranger
Rookie
Have been hitting with a T-7 for about a month. Added lead tape to the 2 and 10 positions and love the heft. Great feel plowing from the baseline and nice punch on serves. Ordered another one!
ced
Professional
still trying Gammas ...... finally the 320X
The low power and 93" head of the 340X plus 18x20 stringbed proved to be a little too much for me .... so after working my way thru a couple of lighter racquets I decided to give the 320X a try !
Even before I hit with it I decided it was a little too light so I added enough lead at 3 and 9 to (with overgrip) bump it up to 11.5 oz, and strung it with Dunlop Comfort Syn Gut 17 @ 48/50.
Its been pretty cold in Atlanta for the last week and I don't think cold weather is a good time to judge a racquet, but this 320X plays so much like the G325 that I can't believe it !!! I need a leather grip on it to bring the weight up a tad and it should be perfect.
Can't wait for a break in the weather to see if my initial assessment holds up as I'm hoping I've found a keeper.
So far I'm really happy to be back in the Gamma fold !
The low power and 93" head of the 340X plus 18x20 stringbed proved to be a little too much for me .... so after working my way thru a couple of lighter racquets I decided to give the 320X a try !
Even before I hit with it I decided it was a little too light so I added enough lead at 3 and 9 to (with overgrip) bump it up to 11.5 oz, and strung it with Dunlop Comfort Syn Gut 17 @ 48/50.
Its been pretty cold in Atlanta for the last week and I don't think cold weather is a good time to judge a racquet, but this 320X plays so much like the G325 that I can't believe it !!! I need a leather grip on it to bring the weight up a tad and it should be perfect.
Can't wait for a break in the weather to see if my initial assessment holds up as I'm hoping I've found a keeper.
So far I'm really happy to be back in the Gamma fold !
The 320x has become my main racquet as well. At first I was unimpressed, bu after giving it a shot I discovered that it does everything well in an understated way. The best of the traditional players frames with a low swingweight and a bit ofstiffness to give a great taste of the spin friendly modern frames . Comfort, feel, touch, spin,. Very transparent frame that gets the job done.
It looks nice, but at a stiffness of 67, it just isn't going to have the plush feeling that something like the T-7 or the Fischer Pro One 98 has.
The T-7 stiffness is 57, which is awesome. It's oh so close to perfect. If only it were slightly smaller in head size, and had a higher weight overall. If it was... well, the G325...
I find the 320x to be way more comfy and plush than the t7. The t7 feels quite jarring and unstable to me now that I have ben playing the 320.
snoopy
Professional
You talk smack about the T-7, you talk smack about me. SAY IT TO MY FACE, come on, SAY IT TO MY FACE
As you can tell by my irrational response above, I'm still enjoying playing with the T-7 and can't imagine using anything else.
forthegame
Hall of Fame
I still hope to one day try the T-7. Not available here so I will try to pick one up off the boards next time I'm Stateside.
ced
Professional
more on the 320X ......
Since I found the 330X to be a little stiff (compared to the T-7 and G325) I was reluctant to give the 320X a try because of its reported flex of 67......... circumstances changed and I had a 320X strung at 48/50 with a decent multi and what I found was very close to a replication of the G325 !!!
It may be different with more tension in the strings, but as mine is, the stiffness seems to be an asset, not a detriment.
Granted I did have to add some lead at 3-9, which helped the stability and so far I'm very pleased with the result. Control is outstanding as is maneuverability and the power of the 320X is more than adequet.
I'm very familiar with the Fischer "feel" (cushy flexy throat, firm stringbed) and though the 320X is not plush it is definitely comfortable( "old school") and an easy transition from the Fischers and an improvement (for me) over the T-7.
It looks nice, but at a stiffness of 67, it just isn't going to have the plush feeling that something like the T-7 or the Fischer Pro One 98 has.
The T-7 stiffness is 57, which is awesome. It's oh so close to perfect. If only it were slightly smaller in head size, and had a higher weight overall. If it was... well, the G325...
Since I found the 330X to be a little stiff (compared to the T-7 and G325) I was reluctant to give the 320X a try because of its reported flex of 67......... circumstances changed and I had a 320X strung at 48/50 with a decent multi and what I found was very close to a replication of the G325 !!!
It may be different with more tension in the strings, but as mine is, the stiffness seems to be an asset, not a detriment.
Granted I did have to add some lead at 3-9, which helped the stability and so far I'm very pleased with the result. Control is outstanding as is maneuverability and the power of the 320X is more than adequet.
I'm very familiar with the Fischer "feel" (cushy flexy throat, firm stringbed) and though the 320X is not plush it is definitely comfortable( "old school") and an easy transition from the Fischers and an improvement (for me) over the T-7.
chrisheile
New User
Demo
I have always been intrigued by the T-7. There haven't been any to demo for a long time. Currently using Head MG Rad OS. Never seen any in the clubs around here.
I have always been intrigued by the T-7. There haven't been any to demo for a long time. Currently using Head MG Rad OS. Never seen any in the clubs around here.
i have 3 of them.
it's been 1 year using them now and i still like them a lot. But the grommets are in bad shape now and you cant buy them anymore. To me this is the perfect stick except i would like to try a bit stiffer version for added power. That's why im interested to try the new donnays, the orange one seem like it would be close with the added weights
it's been 1 year using them now and i still like them a lot. But the grommets are in bad shape now and you cant buy them anymore. To me this is the perfect stick except i would like to try a bit stiffer version for added power. That's why im interested to try the new donnays, the orange one seem like it would be close with the added weights
snoopy
Professional
Did you try calling A T S sports for grommets? They had some a while ago.
Have you ever tried the Gamma G310? It's the same mold as the T-7 but stiffer and a little lighter. I hit with one and I like the T-7 better.
I don't get a long well with stiff frames. I've always hit better with flexy racquets. Unfortunately flexy racquets often need to be really heavy or have huge swingweights to have power and stability. I can't handle high weights and swingweights.
This is why I like the T-7 so much. It's got some flex and it's pretty stable at a moderate weight and swingweight. I think that's a pretty rare combination. Yes it's not very powerful but with a little lead and the right string, I'm getting enough pop for my needs.
It's funny you mention the microgel OS because if I wasn't using the T-7, a leaded up MG Radical MP would be high on my list of frames to use.
You talk smack about the T-7, you talk smack about me. SAY IT TO MY FACE, come on, SAY IT TO MY FACE
As you can tell by my irrational response above, I'm still enjoying playing with the T-7 and can't imagine using anything else.
I will say it right to you
The 320x, for me, makes the T7 feel like a toy. There, I said it!
