The reason Nadal is best, not Fedreer!

N

nadalgirl26

Banned
The reason my sweet Nadal is the best is he has a chance to win at Federers best slams in the future while Federer only has chance to win at his own best slams, not any chance at Nadals best. I think most would agree in all future years fruity Federer hasew no chance two win the Australian or French opens, Nadal is a lock to win both the next sevearl years. However while Fedrer has good chances to win Wimbledon and the U.S Open the next several yeras, Nadal also has chances to win at either, most agree on that too probably. So at Autstralia and French Opens only Nadal has a chance, Federer has none to win unless Nadal missesw one injured like Australian open this year. However at Wimbledon and u.S Federer may have best chance, but Nadal has chance to win too. So that is how Nadal is better.
 
Phillip=Tennis guy

Phillip=Tennis guy

Rookie
.........What in the hell is this.

Okay! You love Nadal cool.

I like the guy too.

But not like this.

Nadal=#2 in the world

Federer= #1

point blank.

Fanatic alert!!!! Nadalgirl is too obsessed.
 
N

nadalgirl26

Banned
Phillip=Tennis guy said:
.........What in the hell is this.

Okay! You love Nadal cool.

I like the guy too.

But not like this.

Nadal=#2 in the world

Federer= #1

point blank.

Fanatic alert!!!! Nadalgirl is too obsessed.
Click to expand...

You dgid not read what I say. Yes I know Feederer is ranked #1 and Nadal #2. However you have to understand what I am saying. You can see that Nadal has some chance at Wimbledon and U.S Open to win even though they are Feds best surfaces. Federere though you would agree has no chance to the Australian or French Opens ever while Nadal is healthy and in his prime, agreed, unles imisses with injury? So you see that is how nadal is really the best no matter rankings. He has a chance to win at all 4 slams, while Federer only has chance to win at his best 2 slams. Federer has better chances at Wimbledon and u.S Open then my swett Nadal maybe, but still Nadal has definite chance to win there too, while at Nadals two best Australian and French, Federer has no chance unless Nadal misses it.
 
Tim Set Match

Tim Set Match

New User
What is this.. picture... oh my.... ;)

image.html
 
C

Chang

Rookie
I don't think Nadal can beat federer at Aussie Open yet. Yes, Australian Open is slow but it is not slippery. federer will be able to get into postion better and therefore should be able to beat Nadal. What do you mean Federer can't win the French, he's a decent player on clay, he almost beat Nadal in Rome.
 
B

bismark

Rookie
Nadal fangirl vs Fed fanboys. LOL. Maybe Nadal fanboys can chip in too. You wouldn't want Nadal fangirl to be outnumbered by Fed fanboys?
 
T

TennisBatman

Semi-Pro
While I would be glad to see Nadal win a couple of US Open and/or Aus Open titles in the near future, he is not there yet. In fact, he has not won either one, yet.

To say that Nadal can stride to legendary tennis glory in the same way that Federer did in the last few years, by winning these 2 grand slams, is like saying that Mario can climb up the next level of floating staircases with his eyes closed, even when he didn't get to the staircases in the first place.
 
T

The ball was in

Semi-Pro
Just when you thought it was safe to return to the bulletin board....NG26 strikes back!!

To be honest, I can't see Nadal winning more slams or becoming legendary as his game is too physical....he depends allot on his movement which as with players like Chang for example...they reached their peak and then slowly disappeared which was a shame....so in the next couple of years...maybe...maybe Nadal can win the Aussie Open and a US open....but he won't be able to put a consistent enough run as what Federer is able to do as at some point...Nadals fitness levels/stamina will decline...sorry to break your heart NG26 :rolleyes:
 
A

AngeloDS

Hall of Fame
Nadals game is taxing on his body. Nadal has youth, but as Roddick had youth as well and you see where Roddick is now. As his game taxed on his body -- he lacks the back bend, the torso rotation, the ability to run down shots like he used to and is stuck with a plethora of injuries.

No forehand, hardly a serve and what-not. Roddick used to have a game similar to Nadal but with the serve.
 
F

framebreaker

Semi-Pro
AngeloDS said:
Nadals game is taxing on his body. Nadal has youth, but as Roddick had youth as well and you see where Roddick is now. As his game taxed on his body -- he lacks the back bend, the torso rotation, the ability to run down shots like he used to and is stuck with a plethora of injuries.

No forehand, hardly a serve and what-not. Roddick used to have a game similar to Nadal but with the serve.
Click to expand...
really bizarre to say that roddick doesn't have youth anymore. even in a sport like tennis:rolleyes:

oh, i just read the rest of your post...............lololol
 
M

motrengaw

New User
You have got to be kidding. The only grandslam he's one has been on clay.Once Nadal starts winning grandslams on another surface you may be able to make that arguement.
 
Watcher

Watcher

Semi-Pro
nadalgirl, will you please shut up? You're making the rest of us Nadal fans look bad with your moronic posts. The only thing you said in the entire opening post that was accurate is that Nadal is better than Fed- everything else was childish "reasoning."

Although since I suspect you're an alt, I imagine making yourself out to be a fool is your every intention.
 
I

InvisibleSoul

Hall of Fame
nadalgirl26 said:
The reason my sweet Nadal is the best is he has a chance to win at Federers best slams in the future while Federer only has chance to win at his own best slams, not any chance at Nadals best. I think most would agree in all future years fruity Federer hasew no chance two win the Australian or French opens, Nadal is a lock to win both the next sevearl years. However while Fedrer has good chances to win Wimbledon and the U.S Open the next several yeras, Nadal also has chances to win at either, most agree on that too probably. So at Autstralia and French Opens only Nadal has a chance, Federer has none to win unless Nadal missesw one injured like Australian open this year. However at Wimbledon and u.S Federer may have best chance, but Nadal has chance to win too. So that is how Nadal is better.
Click to expand...
lollerskates.gif


Logic and reasoning have taken a serious hit here...
 
S

simi

Hall of Fame
Watcher said:
nadalgirl, will you please shut up? You're making the rest of us Nadal fans look bad with your moronic posts. The only thing you said in the entire opening post that was accurate is that Nadal is better than Fed- everything else was childish "reasoning."
Click to expand...

You know, Watcher, it is people like "her", Pusher, Simon, and several others (not you) who make me want to root against Rafael. Never wanted to before. I realize that I shouldn't let childish behavior influence me so much, but it does. We should all emulate the maturity of Susan (VamosRafa). She supports her favorite player, but does so with dignity, honor for other players, and respect for everyone. I would be a better person if I could only be as gracious as Susan.
 
siber222000

siber222000

Semi-Pro
another stupid thread about NADAL IS THE BESTTTTTTT, i mean come on this kind of threads always becomes flaming thread about how nadal is better than federer or federer is better than nadal :neutral:
 
B

BigServer1

Legend
simi said:
You know, Watcher, it is people like "her", Pusher, Simon, and several others (not you) who make me want to root against Rafael. Never wanted to before. I realize that I shouldn't let childish behavior influence me so much, but it does. We should all emulate the maturity of Susan (VamosRafa). She supports her favorite player, but does so with dignity, honor for other players, and respect for everyone. I would be a better person if I could only be as gracious as Susan.
Click to expand...

Man, I echo that. I like Nadal, I like Safin, I like most players on tour. But Horribly excessive fanboys/girls make this just plain frustrating. I find myself thinking, man I hope Federer/Nadal/Safin/Player X loses, just so I can see people jump on the fanboys. I also just wish people could root for the player(s) that they like, but be respectful (and mindful of spelling - aka Federeer) when they talk about other players.
 
Big Fed

Big Fed

Banned
Nadal will never never ever catch Federer becasue fed only loses to one person (Nadal) and that is only on clay but Nadal loses to like a dozen people during each grass and hardcourt seasons. If Nadal keep lossing to people above top 50 how will never catch Fed. Period
 
N

nadalgirl26

Banned
Big Fed said:
Nadal will never never ever catch Federer becasue fed only loses to one person (Nadal) and that is only on clay but Nadal loses to like a dozen people during each grass and hardcourt seasons. If Nadal keep lossing to people above top 50 how will never catch Fed. Period
Click to expand...

My sweet Nadal has beaten Feader twice in a row on hard courts now. Federer was beaten by Murray today on hard courts. You are wrong on borth things and know nothing.
 
B

BigServer1

Legend
nadalgirl26 said:
My sweet Nadal has beaten Feader twice in a row on hard courts now. Federer was beaten by Murray today on hard courts. You are wrong on borth things and know nothing.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, But Roger's record on hard courts over the past two years is like what, 85-3? What is Nadal's record? 41-10. Not nearly as good. I like Nadal a lot, but before we can talk about him as better than Federer, he has to PROVE himself, by winning a slam on something other than clay. Will he? Probably. Has he? No. So stop. You're not making friends with this.
 
T

TrueAce

Rookie
Chang said:
I don't think Nadal can beat federer at Aussie Open yet. Yes, Australian Open is slow but it is not slippery. federer will be able to get into postion better and therefore should be able to beat Nadal. What do you mean Federer can't win the French, he's a decent player on clay, he almost beat Nadal in Rome.
Click to expand...

I don't think it'll matter if hes in position....the ball will be bouncing over his head on the backhand side...at best he'll get it back then Nadal will rip those up the line forehands with a little extra juice just like at FO....Fed will get impatient.......game set match Nadal 6-4 5-7 6-3 6-2
 
zhan

zhan

Banned
nadal has a positive win record vs. fed but it doesnt mean he is better than fed...
fed is completely magical..
nadal is just a perfect example of triumph of the will
 
FEDEXP

FEDEXP

Professional
This is another classic troll post from the nadal girl. I really do hope she is a teenager because as illiterate as she is, it would mean she could still learn. One of the first lessons for her would be for her to recognize that she has is suffering from a serious case of schadenfreude, a most unattractive trait.
 
S

shrakkie

Semi-Pro
how comes nadalgirl types like a child with typos and spelling mstakes etc in the op and then sometimes when she is gettin challenged from the other members and ppl really criticise her she jumps to well punctuated mode...has anyone noticed this?
 
Kaptain Karl

Kaptain Karl

Hall Of Fame
Please remember this is a "Pro Player Discussion" thread. Do not post match results -- or information intimating results -- in this thread.

- KK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

capriatifanatic
  • Poll
Will Nadal win any slam titles this year?
Replies
20
Views
2K
Steve0904
Steve0904
lambielspins
  • Poll
Will Nadal win the Australian Open next year?
Replies
34
Views
2K
Serendipitous
S
N
  • Poll
Who has best chance to upset heavy favorite Djokovic at U.S Open
2
Replies
66
Views
6K
TennisFan3
TennisFan3
M
Is Federer's 5X3 Massively Underrated?
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
duaneeo
duaneeo
M
Rank Big 3 Grand Slam Distribution Achievement by Most Likely to Happen
Replies
1
Views
313
Grgisme
G
Top