TimHenmanATG
Hall of Fame
He's reached 2 slam finals.
And how does that it any way contradict, or even negate, my point?
He's reached 2 slam finals.
And how does that it any way contradict, or even negate, my point?
Lastly, I haven’t seen the ‘Nicolas Massu Argument’ levied yet but it rears it’s ugly head in every Olympic tennis debate. The idea that a lesser player winning a tournament reduces its prestige is illogical. If it were valid we could use that argument to crap on every long lasting tournament in the history of the sport.
He only beat Djokovic once to reach a slam final in a match where Novak was barely trying
And Murray beat exhausted Joe in 2013 Wimbly and vultured the USO 2012 in hurricane like conditions. What's your point? He beat the guy twice at the slams, that's what counts.
As I said, Mugvis Cup>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Olympic exho. No one gave a sh*t about it until one UK guy won it, lol. Yeaah, that's not hype.
Ummm nope, plenty of sh*t was given when one Spain guy won it 4 years earlier. That's not hype either.