Volkl Organix 10 325 vs the PB 10 Mid

Comparing the Organix 10 325 to the PB 10 Mid, both as the X10 is swung to hit the ball, and when it is spun in the hand--which most technicians don't succeed in accomplishing and which was modified to feel the same as my PB 10 Mid--is a subjective review, because I am speaking as to how and what the stick does in my hands, compared to what I am accustomed, as opposed to just what the stick's inherent qualities are--the objective review, as I have previously posted from two other 6.5 players and myself on the "Volkl Organix Club" thread.

Firstly, the X10 325 is a completely new tennis racquet. This stick is a very different animal. It is stiff to the ball, but not to the hand, and there is no vibration. Stiffness ratings and this stick, both versions, is not as applicable, whether that be because of the cellulose in the Organix, the Organix at 12:00, the new grip system, or any combination of the three.This stick defies its specs, and is going to jolt the Spectards out of their alternate realities into the true reality of Player's World. I'm betting that there is going to be a lot of crazy rants, massive cries for "What's your set-up? I've restrung my racquet 37 times and I can't get it to play like my _______!", and the need for Kleenex, big-time, from the keyboards of the Spectards, who will have aneurisms from the unique feel of the X10.

The best way to say this is if you are a PB 10 Mid user, then you can easily use the X10 with minimal adjustment. Never have I used two 93/98in2 sticks that played so close. Although, be forewarned, this is the PB vs the Organix Line, not the Organix 93in2 vs the Organix 98in2. This stick also has a very different feel, due to the Organix, the lay-up, the head shape, and the beam shape. If you observe Spectard Law, you are surely doomed to failure.

The ball speed/character is the same coming off the stick, but the feel at contact isn't. At contact, with the X10, there is no vibration transferred to the hand as there is with the PB 10 Mid. As soon as the ball leaves the frame, you only feel the racquet moving through the air, as opposed to feeling the frame wobble between contact and follow-through. For some, this is the Volkl feel/feedback, because what you just did, is still resonating from the frame, to your hand, and up to your brain. The Organix at 12:00, and the Organix material at all four poles, completely changes the feel and dynamics of the ball response off of the string bed. It's a completely new feel. Be prepared to spend a little time to adjust, because the first time you hit a ball, "what the frak?" will be your first and only thought.

There is more plow thru with the PB 10 Mid, which is expected for a 93in2 vs a 98in2. It is most evident when you flatten out your shot and hit volleys, but the difference is not tremendous. Depending on your volley technique and footwork technique when you volley, this factor may have no discernible affect.

The X10 does perform better on low balls and short-hopped balls, which is expected due to the larger head. However, applying curved topspin or sidespin, is far better with the X10, which I attribute to the Organix material at 12:00 as well, since you are swinging from the inside of the ball to the outside for the former, and from outside the ball to inside the ball for the latter, forcing you to lead with the tip of the head.

They both serve equally well, but you may get slightly more spin with the X10. Making directional adjustments, is also a tad better with the X10, which again, I attribute to the response from the Organix at 12:00. Lastly, when you are stretched wide, the extra power coming from a stiffer head, if not also because of the cellulose in the DNX mix, allows the ball to rebound off the string a little easier. Perhaps, this will provide you with a few more SAVES--shots hit into the court just to stay in the point which have no other specific purpose--rewarding you more points or games, since, at the lower levels of the game, getting one more ball over can often elicit an error, although at the higher levels, it's just a set-up for your opponents winner.

Personally, although I can play with it nearly as well, I need to be able to make corrections immediately, on the very next shot. The older I get, the better I used to be. Thus, I need the longer feedback, and although not tremendously more, the PB 10 Mid gives my brain/hand a little more info, whereas the X10, would force me to have to read what my ball is doing as it travelled towards the other side of the court, then, mentally process that info and translate it to my hand to adjust for the following ball. Against under-30's players, I don't have time to think; I need to react immediately on-contact.

Lastly, be mindful that I have a longer, slower, and flatter swing. Modern players and certainly younger players, accelerate the racquet faster and with more spin than I, providing for the needed control and consistency, which I cannot provide with my technique. I just need more time for my hand to process the information. Also, due to my volley technique, frequent need to slice high BH returns on the ad side, and the need to sometimes adjust on-contact when I cannot meet the ball at the optimum contact point with relationship to my body, I need the plow thru of a 93in2. Otherwise, I would switch to the X10 325 in a NY minute.
 
Last edited:
Firstly, the X10 325 is a completely new tennis racquet. This stick is a very different animal. It is stiff to the ball, but not to the hand, and there is no vibration..........

The ball speed/character is the same coming off the stick, but the feel at contact isn't. At contact, with the X10, there is no vibration transferred to the hand as there is with the PB 10 Mid. As soon as the ball leaves the frame, you only feel the racquet moving through the air, as opposed to feeling the frame wobble between contact and follow-through. .

Interesting. This almost sounds like the no-vibration 'pop' I felt when I (playing with a Donnay Allwood at the time) first picked up the 'green' Yonex 8500 OPS (oval pressed shaft).
 

TourTenor

Professional
TM ... Interesting point about the new frame's feedback and what I would call, racquet feel. Sorry about this being long-winded but this brings up a topic that has everything to do with why I have been a huge Volkl proponent ...

A little background ...

A few years ago I was impressed with the butter-like feel of the Gen 2 and later found the early DNX sticks to be a bit harsh by comparison.

The DNX 10 mid was only slightly on the harsh side and I think it was counteracted by some heft. Then I discovered the BB11 line and first, the mid plus. I was disappointed with the mid-plus but, not so much with the feel ... it just seemed a tad too light and whippy. I was not getting the response on the ball that I wanted. I was more impressed with the BB11 mid. For a while I used them as my main squeeze.

When the PB10 mid came out I discovered that it was a significant improvement to the prior DNX and BB sticks, feel-wise. They are certainly a different feel than the Gen 2's that I once coveted. I attribute the PB's improved feel to better placement of the DNX material in combination with the hl racquet balance. The PB10 mids are my main sticks to this day.

Today ...

Allright, now here comes the X10 which you describe as stiff to the ball not to the hand and with no vibration. Are you saying that Volkl has figured out a way to bring back that buttery feel (that most would attribute to the Gen 1 or 2?) while playing up the new nano technology? I am a bit confused as to whether the X10 is heading back to a more buttery feel (that many liked) or whether it is simply not providing much feel at all?? (This makes me remember the old days when I played with first Bancroft sticks that had metal composite interlayed into the wood. Those sticks were very firm but still had some feel)

Over the years I have developed a pretty good understanding of racquet stiffness ... can this stick be compared to others stiffness wise? (By the way I do not think of myself as "a spectard" by any means. I know you have to demo racquets to make good decisions when purchasing. I also know that sticks that have a stiffness rating in the mid-sixties or higher won't feel as good to me as those around 60 or so ... from years of experience.)

Anyway, your insights are much appreciated. TTen
 
$$$$=?????

If you're asking for price, the cameraman/editor for a half day shoot/half day editing is usually around $1,200, including lunch. Then there is the cost of the tennis on-court time for the coach; off-line time for the tennis coach/expert to evaluate the time codes and what to edit; any additional edit time per hour; production fees for DVD's or uploading time to any sites. Lastly, you have to hope that the player didn't have the jitters and played like crap, otherwise, you have a re-shoot, which entails 1/2 price for the camera, and coach's on-court fee for two hours. There may also be court fees, anywhere from $60-$150/hr indoors. Sometimes there are outdoor fees.

Bottom Line: It isn't cheap. If you're lucky, many college coaches are OK with parent shot videos for prospects to upload to youtube. For sponsors...you need to go all out.
 
You know what....I have two greens and one gold.....I'm going to go out and hit a few with them!
^^^^
do you really have that 'greenie'?... are you kidding? wow-lol

when i was introduced to the game, i hit with the usual 'sticks' that the 'players' used (Wilson Kramer, Dunlop Maxply Fort...and the throat-tapered--and pretty--Davis Classic), all of them wood.

Then one of the local superstars would lend me his Y-Yonex when I'd bug him *ad nauseum* (he btw was an D-1 6.0 who ended up going big-time from the east coast red clay/har-tru, and with his Kramer-esque 'big-game' and YY8500, took 'scalps' from some USC's, ArizonaSts., etc. in hard court match play....what a generous spirit).

Years later, not surprisingly, he showed up at the same (1880's) club I grew up in (I wuz a 'swimmer') and he was sucking wind big-time playing (in his return-to-the-east-coast) against an asst-pro there who'd played #2 for Princeton, another 'sweet/generous' soul who sat back 20 feet behind the baseline and essentially said: "how do you like the HUMIDITY?"

-was a club that Tilden among others played tourneys at..i.e. it had (and still does) have 'mucho' area behind the red clay court baselines...something that the 4.0's to this day use to their advantage when playing inter-club matches in what IS, the oldest inter-club tennis league (1924) in the United States.

Further, up until recent years, all men's finals at that joint (singles/doubles) were best-of-5-sets. And (excepting 2 years for WWI), it was the oldest club tourney in the U.S.

p.s. there's a pix in the lounge of the Four Musketeers playing an exibition there in '31

1888

(noticing that you're in NYC), I know that Mary Osterbridge brought the game to the US (Staten Island) in the late 1870's, one of the above-mentioned club's founding fathers was a relative. (Ewing)

www.wctl.net/

Best,
DP

p.s and enjoying (my opponents not) the reincarnation of the 'old' C10: the PB 10 Mid
 
^^^^
do you really have that 'greenie'?... are you kidding? wow-lol

when i was introduced to the game, i hit with the usual 'sticks' that the 'players' used (Wilson Kramer, Dunlop Maxply Fort...and the throat-tapered--and pretty--Davis Classic), all of them wood.

Then one of the local superstars would lend me his Y-Yonex when I'd bug him *ad nauseum* (he btw was an D-1 6.0 who ended up going big-time from the east coast red clay/har-tru, and with his Kramer-esque 'big-game' and YY8500, took 'scalps' from some USC's, ArizonaSts., etc. in hard court match play....what a generous spirit).

Years later, not surprisingly, he showed up at the same (1880's) club I grew up in (I wuz a 'swimmer') and he was sucking wind big-time playing (in his return-to-the-east-coast) against an asst-pro there who'd played #2 for Princeton, another 'sweet/generous' soul who sat back 20 feet behind the baseline and essentially said: "how do you like the HUMIDITY?"

-was a club that Tilden among others played tourneys at..i.e. it had (and still does) have 'mucho' area behind the red clay court baselines...something that the 4.0's to this day use to their advantage when playing inter-club matches in what IS, the oldest inter-club tennis league (1924) in the United States.

Further, up until recent years, all men's finals at that joint (singles/doubles) were best-of-5-sets. And (excepting 2 years for WWI), it was the oldest club tourney in the U.S.

p.s. there's a pix in the lounge of the Four Musketeers playing an exibition there in '31

1888

(noticing that you're in NYC), I know that Mary Osterbridge brought the game to the US (Staten Island) in the late 1870's, one of the above-mentioned club's founding fathers was a relative. (Ewing)

www.wctl.net/

Best,
DP

p.s and enjoying (my opponents not) the reincarnation of the 'old' C10: the PB 10 Mid

Are you talking NY Athletic Club by the Throgs Neck? I don't spend much time in Westchester CCs. I'm more familiar with the CCs in Nassau. Are there still red clay courts in some of the clubs in the Westchester league? BTW, if you're looking for good players between 40-60 years old, the New Rochelle Tennis Club is a good place, and the membership fee is ridiculously cheap. I also like the fact that they are plopped right in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The old Volkl rep plays there and does the racquet stringing to keep busy at 70-plus years.
 
Last edited:
Are you talking NY Athletic Club by the Throgs Neck? I don't spend much time in Westchester CCs. I'm more familiar with the CCs in Nassau. Are there still red clay courts in some of the clubs in the Westchester league? BTW, if you're looking for good players between 40-60 years old, the New Rochelle Tennis Club is a good place, and the membership fee is ridiculously cheap. I also like the fact that they are plopped right in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The old Volkl rep plays there and does the racquet stringing to keep busy at 70-plus years.
The NYAC (Travers Island on the New Rochelle-Pelham Manor border) has all Har-tru. The club I was referring to is on the west (Hudson River) side. As for 'red clay' courts, some clubs have both Har-tru and red clay and when playing a match (best of 7: 3 singles/4 doubles) sometimes in the interest of time, lower doubles matches are assigned to a 'red' court, e.g. www.armonktennis.com (I play indoors there in the winter). Click on the link above and you'll see the Har-tru/red-clay mix

As for New Rochelle T.C. (www.newrochelletennisclub.com), indeed 'depth' is the key word...wonderful club that arranges games for members on very well-maintained Har-tru courts. And, there are also couple of under 40 studs (e.g. high-level D-1 players, former ranked European jr., etc.) that play at N.R.T.C. as well. As for Ch___k H_yde_ (former Volkl rep-nice guy), yes I know him well (psst...I'm a member there). The stringer at NRTC however is Chris T. (affectionately/playfully referred to as: "stringer-to-the-stars" as he's serviced many a pro event during his career as well--good man.
 
TM ... Interesting point about the new frame's feedback and what I would call, racquet feel. Sorry about this being long-winded but this brings up a topic that has everything to do with why I have been a huge Volkl proponent ...

A little background ...

A few years ago I was impressed with the butter-like feel of the Gen 2 and later found the early DNX sticks to be a bit harsh by comparison.

The DNX 10 mid was only slightly on the harsh side and I think it was counteracted by some heft. Then I discovered the BB11 line and first, the mid plus. I was disappointed with the mid-plus but, not so much with the feel ... it just seemed a tad too light and whippy. I was not getting the response on the ball that I wanted. I was more impressed with the BB11 mid. For a while I used them as my main squeeze.

When the PB10 mid came out I discovered that it was a significant improvement to the prior DNX and BB sticks, feel-wise. They are certainly a different feel than the Gen 2's that I once coveted. I attribute the PB's improved feel to better placement of the DNX material in combination with the hl racquet balance. The PB10 mids are my main sticks to this day.

Today ...

Allright, now here comes the X10 which you describe as stiff to the ball not to the hand and with no vibration. Are you saying that Volkl has figured out a way to bring back that buttery feel (that most would attribute to the Gen 1 or 2?) while playing up the new nano technology? I am a bit confused as to whether the X10 is heading back to a more buttery feel (that many liked) or whether it is simply not providing much feel at all?? (This makes me remember the old days when I played with first Bancroft sticks that had metal composite interlayed into the wood. Those sticks were very firm but still had some feel)

Over the years I have developed a pretty good understanding of racquet stiffness ... can this stick be compared to others stiffness wise? (By the way I do not think of myself as "a spectard" by any means. I know you have to demo racquets to make good decisions when purchasing. I also know that sticks that have a stiffness rating in the mid-sixties or higher won't feel as good to me as those around 60 or so ... from years of experience.)

Anyway, your insights are much appreciated. TTen

Sorry that I missed this yesterday.

I am totally on-board with your evolution from the DNX to the PB 10 Mid. However, I was coaching 4-5 male players between 2000-2004 when I switched to the amazing T10 VE Mid, so I had to use the T10 Tour Mid to be able hit and hang with them in my mid-forties, so I don't even remember demoing the larger heads. The only two guys whom I knew who used the T10 Gen 1 or 2 were Taino and Kim, and except for Eric's BH, neither clubbed the ball; they hit solid balls and had great technique pressuring the ball and super footwork. Basically, my only comparisons would be based on what I saw Eric able to do, so I'm at a disadvantage to make accurate comparisons.

"Are you saying that Volkl has figured out a way to bring back that buttery feel (that most would attribute to the Gen 1 or 2?) while playing up the new nano technology?"

Yes, but not in the context of a traditional graphite frame. The X10, does not feel like anything I've ever touched. Firstly, you can compare its head flex to the Nadal APD and the Wilson 6.1, but much easier on the arm, and in fact, much more resistant to bending or twisting, with far, far, less vibration and a much, much better response in the upper part of the hoop, and anywhere else outside of the sweet spot. In addition, the string bed response is unique; it reacts to force/pressure differently, almost as though the string bed was a solid, with its perimeter attached to the frame with springs. That solid face provides for an awesome amount of precision.

Does it feel buttery like the Gen 1/2--see above--I don't know, but buttery to me, is the BB 11 MP or the original Prestige. The X10 does not feel like a BB stick; it feels like a Volkl with no vibration and no hoop wobble. You feel what the stick does, but the ride is very smooth, like hitting a pothole in a sports car, but the suspension absorbs the bad and only lets you be aware that you drove into a bad hole...if the analogy helps. The stick is just a new tennis racquet; you have to put it in your hands, and break SPECTARD laws while doing so, since, this frame totally defies specs, as all DNX derived frames do.

"(This makes me remember the old days when I played with first Bancroft sticks that had metal composite interlayed into the wood. Those sticks were very firm but still had some feel)"

I agree. I played a few tourneys with a Snawaert Boronite and its sister open throated frame just before I switched to the Wilson Ultra Standard, and the Snawaerts still played like wood with the advantage of an almost graphite racquet response. To this day, I use these two frames for ten minutes or so, with my players, and although they are under 30-years old, they adapt almost immediately, since they also always hit dead center.
 
The NYAC (Travers Island on the New Rochelle-Pelham Manor border) has all Har-tru. The club I was referring to is on the west (Hudson River) side. As for 'red clay' courts, some clubs have both Har-tru and red clay and when playing a match (best of 7: 3 singles/4 doubles) sometimes in the interest of time, lower doubles matches are assigned to a 'red' court, e.g. www.armonktennis.com (I play indoors there in the winter). Click on the link above and you'll see the Har-tru/red-clay mix

As for New Rochelle T.C. (www.newrochelletennisclub.com), indeed 'depth' is the key word...wonderful club that arranges games for members on very well-maintained Har-tru courts. And, there are also couple of under 40 studs (e.g. high-level D-1 players, former ranked European jr., etc.) that play at N.R.T.C. as well. As for Ch___k H_yde_ (former Volkl rep-nice guy), yes I know him well (psst...I'm a member there). The stringer at NRTC however is Chris T. (affectionately/playfully referred to as: "stringer-to-the-stars" as he's serviced many a pro event during his career as well--good man.

Yes, the Armonk club is a nice place to be. They hold a decent amount of tourneys there, and they are very welcoming to players and coaches.

Ch___k H_yde_....he's the man....I go back with him to my early playing days when he sponsored my doubles partner. I was told by Cliff that he was doing some stringing.

Chris is a good stringer, when he wants to be. I have sent some juniors to him who reside in the area, although some prefer Todd in Scarsdale at the NY Racquet&String.
 

TourTenor

Professional
Sorry that I missed this yesterday.

I am totally on-board with your evolution from the DNX to the PB 10 Mid. However, ... since they also always hit dead center.
TM, Thanks for the detailed response. You certainly have my curiosity up, at this point. Hopefully, I will get a chance to demo the O10 to see what this unique feel is all about. TTen
 
I hit again with just the X10 other night, and if I played competitively, I would probably switch. I have only tolerated a 98in2 for the short time between when the C10 pro came out and when the C10 Pro Tour was released, which was nine months for me, if memory serves, so switching to a 98in2 would not be easy.

The stick would add a little more margin for error with approach shots and volleys, both of which because I am older, which forces me to end points moving forward more often, to more quickly end points and to keep younger guys from running me and forcing me to hit short. I am sticking with the PB 10 Mid because when I am balanced, I hit a better ball then with the X10, and when I drill, which is 90% of my time on-court, I am always balanced.
 

JackB1

G.O.A.T.
Has anyone see any Organix sticks in their local tennis stores yet? I sure haven't. The only places that seem to have them so far is the online stores.
 

dParis

Hall of Fame
Has anyone see any Organix sticks in their local tennis stores yet? I sure haven't. The only places that seem to have them so far is the online stores.
Your Advantage in Chicago, but that's the only place I see Volkl racquets around here anymore.
 

Beagle97

New User
Folsom Tennis has the Volkl Organix line plus demos, and the Melbourne also. Most other stores in my area don't though.
 

JackB1

G.O.A.T.
Fact is that Volkl has horrible distribution. Even stores that do have their sticks won't carry the entire line. I can find a Head, Prince or Wilson racquet in less than 1/2 hour no matter where I am in the country. Can u say that about a Volkl? Everyone in the NY area isn't going to drive into Manhattan to get an Organix. They want to go to their local Sports Authority or Dick's and get it there.
 

rovision

Rookie
Fact is that Volkl has horrible distribution. Even stores that do have their sticks won't carry the entire line. I can find a Head, Prince or Wilson racquet in less than 1/2 hour no matter where I am in the country. Can u say that about a Volkl? Everyone in the NY area isn't going to drive into Manhattan to get an Organix. They want to go to their local Sports Authority or Dick's and get it there.

I'd rather prefer Volkl staying where they are. Sure, some growth would be nice, but I wouldn't like them to become the next H, P, or W. Most things are better in smaller quantities. :)
 
Fuggedaboutit!!!

Nobody, absolutely NOBODY, drives into the City unless it's Sunday, they wish to hunt for an hour to find a spot, want to feed the meter every 50 minutes, can afford the $45 or more per hour to park in a garage, or are drain bramaged, especially, in the areas where all of the retailers who carry Volkl are located.

There are many VIP's in any of the boroughs, LI, Westchester, and Jersey to get any BB/Volkl stick that you want within two days, and pro shops all over for those few who don't belong to a club, and/or don't have a tennis pro or a coach. Our rep will also take direct contacts from anyone for assistance.

Drive to the City to buy a stick!

Tourists.......
 
Last edited:

Hominator

Hall of Fame
I had the chance to hit with the X10 and PB10 mid side-by-side last night. To me, these sticks were close, but will likely be appreciated by different kinds of players. Both of my sticks were strung with a multi.

The X10 feels very firm, yet cushioned. When you hit the ball, it almost feels like you're hitting the ball with a solid paddle. There isn't any sign of wobble or hoop flex. The string bed response also feels quicker off the X10, perhaps because of the Organix mix at the poles. It was also very easy to hit topspin with this frame.

The PB10 mid, in comparison, feels much softer and appears to have a longer string bed response, or dwell time. There's definitely more of a "catch and release" feel from the string bed. The frame itself plays much softer.

Both frames had good plow through, with the PB10 mid having a little more. I could hit a little heavier ball with the PB10 mid, however.

I think players who play a more modern game might be drawn more to the X10 while players who play more of a classic game will appreciate the control and touch of the PB10 mid.

I hope this helps!
 

Pneumated1

Hall of Fame
I had the chance to hit with the X10 and PB10 mid side-by-side last night. To me, these sticks were close, but will likely be appreciated by different kinds of players. Both of my sticks were strung with a multi.

The X10 feels very firm, yet cushioned. When you hit the ball, it almost feels like you're hitting the ball with a solid paddle. There isn't any sign of wobble or hoop flex. The string bed response also feels quicker off the X10, perhaps because of the Organix mix at the poles. It was also very easy to hit topspin with this frame.

The PB10 mid, in comparison, feels much softer and appears to have a longer string bed response, or dwell time. There's definitely more of a "catch and release" feel from the string bed. The frame itself plays much softer.

Both frames had good plow through, with the PB10 mid having a little more. I could hit a little heavier ball with the PB10 mid, however.

I think players who play a more modern game might be drawn more to the X10 while players who play more of a classic game will appreciate the control and touch of the PB10 mid.

I hope this helps!

Thanks, man! You just saved me, at a minimum, $20. I'm really surprised that you didn't like the London. I have a TW leather on mine with overgrip, 4 grams of hoop mods, 1 gram on the inside of the throat, and 4" of Gamma head tape on the top of the bumper, with a Sampras dampener. I can't imagine that you wouldn't like it a little beefed up. Although, if you're going to go through all that, I don't know why you wouldn't just hit your Mid.
 
I had the chance to hit with the X10 and PB10 mid side-by-side last night. To me, these sticks were close, but will likely be appreciated by different kinds of players. Both of my sticks were strung with a multi.

The X10 feels very firm, yet cushioned. When you hit the ball, it almost feels like you're hitting the ball with a solid paddle. There isn't any sign of wobble or hoop flex. The string bed response also feels quicker off the X10, perhaps because of the Organix mix at the poles. It was also very easy to hit topspin with this frame.

The PB10 mid, in comparison, feels much softer and appears to have a longer string bed response, or dwell time. There's definitely more of a "catch and release" feel from the string bed. The frame itself plays much softer.

Both frames had good plow through, with the PB10 mid having a little more. I could hit a little heavier ball with the PB10 mid, however.

I think players who play a more modern game might be drawn more to the X10 while players who play more of a classic game will appreciate the control and touch of the PB10 mid.

I hope this helps!

Sounds good to me. I would be interested in your comparison between your modified PB 10 Mid and my modified X10.

On another note, aren't you glad that you were able to get your sticks without being so clueless as to think about driving into the City like some dumb tourist? At least you're a smart B&T-er and take the bus to 42nd St., although, walking at a normal pace would be good thing!:)
 
Last edited:
I blew the dust off of my PB 10 Mid matched X10 325 after hitting with another player's Melbourne and a proto, because I was intrigued with the lively response of the Melbourne--how did I ever miss that? The PB 10 Mid's dwell time and plow thru is hard to give up, but the bite and its surprisingly subsequent drive control puts me in a quandary, especially since I've never liked anything above 93in2. There is just something about the DC material and the X material in the new cross section shapes which changes intrinsic playability big time. Going to have to hit a lot of balls through the heat wave this weekend!
 
Top