BorgTheGOAT
Legend
I mean it is fine, everyone can have his own beliefs but I find von Däniken and Musk not exactly the most reliable people as references.I can't tell if he's committing to a bit, or if sincere in his beliefs...
I mean it is fine, everyone can have his own beliefs but I find von Däniken and Musk not exactly the most reliable people as references.I can't tell if he's committing to a bit, or if sincere in his beliefs...
Because taxation is also about incentives, and you need to encourage population stability for economic growth and a healthy working age, tax-paying population to support things like social security/pensions/healthcare. If anything, there aren't enough tax benefits for people with children -- childcare should be tax deductible, for example, in a country where it isn't provided for free.So, I was just wondering why people get tax write-offs and other benefits,
just because they have children? Seems like it should be the other way around.
People without children should pay less tax because they use fewer social
programs and are less of a burden on the economy.
Can you post some of the sources for this? I am curious to see how these conclusions were arrived at.Yes older civilizations were destroyed by floods, earthquakes, asteroids and many things. It has happened quite a few times.
What research ? Who are these people doing research and debunking these theories ? Have they been alive for millennia to debunk? Science is not perfect, a lot of it is flawed. Don't believe everything said by scientists, half of them are operating on best guess....The ancient texts of abrahamic religions, hinduism and many faiths talk of these floods and ancient God like aliens visiting earth, creating the first humans and educating them with morals and basic ways of leading life...all this is not fake.
Real scientists (people who invented important things in history) were all agnostic/religious, they had an open mind to the possibiity of Gods and what it means to be a creator, but we have modern day phony scientists with some little patents masquerating as atheists and talking nonsense on religions as if science has all the answers ??? No way buddy, I am not arrogant enough to disprove ancient aliens theory because that would mean taking an ostrich approach to life by saying we are alone in this universe, there is no god, just us.... that is nonsense.
It is up to the person positing the theory to provide proof. e.g. If Kyrie Irving claims the earth is flat he has to provide evidence and also be able withstand the round earth people's evidence.Scientists have not provided any proof convincing enough to suggest that aliens did not visit earth to create man / build pyramids etc etc, so why should we trust scientists?
We trust scientists on medicine, engineering and lot of stuffs, but not on history, I would trust religious texts and theories revolving around them. At least ancient aliens sound convincing enough.
i think we should all have children, but i do think we should put a limit on the amount. One or Two at most. this is cause world population is getting out of control. we can't survive this population explotionHow manny of you decided not to have children? How manny regret it? Be honest. I am in a turning point in my life, just want to hear some opinions.
Are there men who desperately want children? I dont know that feeling.
Would you have children with someone who you love 10000% and she is everything in your life? And if you know that she will probably leave you if you will not make the child in near future?
Von Däniken, Elon Musk, who is the next source we should believe more than scientists? Tsitsipas? It is ok let’s just agree to disagree, I don’t think we will see eye to eye on that one.
Can you post some of the sources for this? I am curious to see how these conclusions were arrived at.
It is up to the person positing the theory to provide proof. e.g. If Kyrie Irving claims the earth is flat he has to provide evidence and also be able withstand the round earth people's evidence.
That is not so much about history and archaeology but more about physics, especially astronomy.I trust scientists on everything related to science but not on history, even archaeology unfortunately has its limits, sometimes remnants of ancient times have been lost due to passing of time, lot of that cannot be proven but that doesn't mean it is not true.
So is the theory about BigFoot, Yeti, Nessi, Mu, Lemuria, Atlantis and hundreds more. All are nice theories and it is fun to think about it, but if we look deeper into it most of those legends are debunked and have a lot of logical flaws (I give a small chance still to Atlantis having some core of truth, even though not 100% like Plato described it).Ancient Aliens is a cool theory
Scientists have not provided any proof convincing enough to suggest that aliens did not visit earth to create man / build pyramids etc etc, so why should we trust scientists?
We trust scientists on medicine, engineering and lot of stuffs, but not on history, I would trust religious texts and theories revolving around them. At least ancient aliens sound convincing enough.
That is not so much about history and archaeology but more about physics, especially astronomy.
So is the theory about BigFoot, Yeti, Nessi, Mu, Lemuria, Atlantis and hundreds more. All are nice theories and it is fun to think about it, but if we look deeper into it most of those legends are debunked and have a lot of logical flaws (I give a small chance still to Atlantis having some core of truth, even though not 100% like Plato described it).
Lemuria is definitely a myth, Atlantis as I said might have a core of truth, but two difficulties arise here in what Platon writes. First he says in Timaios that Atlantis was bigger than Asia and Africa together which is absolutely impossible unless he is speaking about the American continent which wasn’t destroyed by floods however. And second, he dates the destruction of Atlantis 9.500 years B.C which is way too long back considering that he also writes about Atlantis losing a war against Athens which definitely didn’t exist at that time. Therefore the predominating stance of historians is that Platon invented the story because he was unhappy with his fellow Athens-citizens who had become decadent and wanted to give them a wake-up call by telling a story about some ideal society that ruled the world and got too greedy at some point which led to their demise and ultimate destruction (on the other hand he states in both Timaios and Kritias that the story is true and that he got it from an Egyptian priest of Sais).Why does Michio Kaku believe in ancient aliens if that is absurd ? He is a scientist.
Who are the archangels/gods/deities that are worshiped in various cultures? If they are not inter-dimensional travelers (aliens) then what are they?
Atlantis & Lemuria are no myths, underwater cities and ruins do exist, not every water filled region today was the same thousands of years, sea levels do rise and drop sometimes and cities do sink. When something like that will happen again then mankind's faith on God will be firm once again, in recent decades the generations have become atheists
As far as I know he believes that we will soon be able to contact them via transmission, not that they would ever be able to reach our planet.Why does Michio Kaku believe in ancient aliens if that is absurd ? He is a scientist.
Lemuria is definitely a myth, Atlantis as I said might have a core of truth, but two difficulties arise here in what Platon writes. First he says in Timaios that Atlantis was bigger than Asia and Africa together which is absolutely impossible unless he is speaking about the American continent which wasn’t destroyed by floods however. And second, he dates the destruction of Atlantis 9.500 years B.C which is way too long back considering that he also writes about Atlantis losing a war against Athens which definitely didn’t exist at that time. Therefore the predominating stance of historians is that Platon invented the story because he was unhappy with his fellow Athens-citizens who had become decadent and wanted to give them a wake-up call by telling a story about some ideal society that ruled the world and got too greedy at some point which led to their demise and ultimate destruction (on the other hand he states in both Timaios and Kritias that the story is true and that he got it from an Egyptian priest of Sais).
One theory which I think could maybe be true is that there was some error in translation from Egyptian hieroglyphs for years and months which would set the date of Atlantis’ destruction roughly at 1.200 B.C. which coincides with the proven destruction of several cultures of the bronce ages by the attack of the sea-people whose origin is still not known until now. As well there were several floods and eruptions at that time (minoan volcanic eruption that destroyed Thera), so this might be a possible explanation.
As far as I know he believes that we will soon be able to contact them via transmission, not that they would ever be able to reach our planet.
One theory which I think could maybe be true is that there was some error in translation from Egyptian hieroglyphs for years and months which would set the date of Atlantis’ destruction roughly at 1.200 B.C. which coincides with the proven destruction of several cultures of the bronce ages by the attack of the sea-people whose origin is still not known until now. As well there were several floods and volcanic eruptions at that time (minoan eruption that destroyed Thera), so this might be a possible explanation.
The story of Lemuria does not exist for 1000 years, it was postulated in 1864 by a zoologist and biologist who tried to find an explanation for primate fossils being found in Madagascar and India but not on the African continent which led him speculate that Madagascar and India were once part of a sunken continent called Lemuria. This has long been debunked though and there are better explanation for this alleged anomaly. As for Atlantis: no ancient philosopher/writer apart from Platon ever mentioned it and there were already lots of doubts about the truth of his story among his contemporaries and later among Romans, so it is not that those are stories that have survived thousands of years without being questioned. I also trust Plato, question is as I said, what his intention was. Did he want to tell a true story? Did he want to give a wake-up call to the population of Athens? Did he want to make up a good story where his Polis defeats a seemingly unbeatable opponent? There are many possible explanations.Not just Atlantis, even Lemuria existed.
It is a sunken continent that is connected with India, Madagascar and Australia, the ancient Tamil People had this as their continent long long ago. In India the south indian culture predates north indian culture by many millenia but most of india abroad is known by the north india way of life, however truth is far from that, one of the reason for this is because ancient north indians migrated to present day India from arctic regions during the polar shift while south indians were already established in India long before that and are the original native residents of the land. This ancient sunken continent Lemuria was known as Kumari Kandam by Tamilians in India and the words "Kumari Kandam" first appear in Kanda Puranam, a 15th-century Tamil version of the Skanda Purana, written by Kachiappa Sivacharyara (1350–1420).
I believe any stories which exist for thousands of years must have some truth to it, we cannot write epics and sell it to the public so that it can be remembered 5000-10000 years later, that is not possible. You can write Game of Throne or LOTR today but nobody is buying it to be real. So these stories are not false, they are definitely real.
I trust Plato as well, Atlantis must have been real just like Lemuria/Kumari Kandam.
"manny"? Twice.How manny of you decided not to have children? How manny regret it?
The story of Lemuria does not exist for 1000 years, it was postulated in 1864 by a zoologist and biologist who tried to find an explanation for primate fossils being found in Madagascar and India but not on the African continent which led him speculate that Madagascar and India were once part of a sunken continent called Lemuria. This has long been debunked though and there are better explanation for this alleged anomaly. As for Atlantis: no ancient philosopher/writer apart from Platon ever mentioned it and there were already lots of doubts about the truth of his story among his contemporaries and later among Romans, so it is not that those are stories that have survived thousands of years without being questioned. I also trust Plato, question is as I said, what his intention was. Did he want to tell a true story? Did he want to give a wake-up call to the population of Athens? Did he want to make up a good story where his Polys defeats a seemingly unbeatable opponent? There are many possible explanations.
yeah it is. i paid a big price, my "tennis leftie project" is "frozen".That is awesome man
It really is.This thread is a blast!