"Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away"
The circumstances are completely different lol. All I can say is if you think Nigel Farage is an extremist for wanting to drastically limit immigration and for believing that multiculturalism has been a disaster for the UK then there's a helluva lot of extremists currently living in this country.Farage had originally posted the video after being invited there by Djokovic’s brother then Murray reposted the same video with comments, “Please record the awkward moment when you tell them you’ve spent most of your career campaigning to have people from Eastern Europe deported ”
The circumstances are completely different lol. All I can say is if you think Nigel Farage is an extremist for wanting to drastically limit immigration and for believing that multiculturalism has been a disaster for the UK then there's a helluva lot of extremists currently living in this country.
Why is he responsible for what his family says or does?I am going to guess that Djokovic's family helped make him disliked by a decent number of people. The 'king is dead' stuff directed at Federer was low class as was all of Srjdan's many statements to the press about Federer and Nadal in addition to the family later inviting an extremist like Nigel Farage to represent them and comparing Novak to Jesus and Spartacus.
His delusional and cocky statement that he was in control of the match at RG 2006 when he retired at 2 sets down against Nadal was another early clue.
Novak being so openly friendly with extreme right-wing nationalists in Serbia and singing and hugging them at weddings etc (while himself evading taxes and living in Monaco) surely added fuel to the fire for anyone paying attention.
Let's also not forget telling a crowd to eat his ----- or screaming at ball kids, smashing his racquet many times, launching it into the crowd at the Olympics and abandoning his mixed doubles partner there too.
Frankly, he's lucky that a lot of what he and his family does isn't covered much outside of Serbia and that his worst curses are in Serbian.
Why is he responsible for what his family says or does?
Well, now that's just not true. Srdjan, and specially Dijana toned it down a lot after the "king is dead" thing. Also their animosity towards Federer isn't all that unjustified. There was a match where Fed yelled at the Djokovic box telling them to shut up, which is pretty classless if you ask me.Are you actually asking me why in the court of public opinion would it matter to people that Djokovic's mother, father, wife and brother made outrageous statements and decisions repeatedly without him ever intervening to distance himself from those positions or to press those responsible to refrain from doing so?
Do nothing different. The guy has been a joy to watch on court and I like his off court personality as well. I wouldn’t want him to change. I like how he has his own mind and is anti-establishment on different matters.
Well, now that's just not true. Srdjan, and specially Dijana toned it down a lot after the "king is dead" thing. Also their animosity towards Federer isn't all that unjustified. There was a match where Fed yelled at the Djokovic box telling them to shut up, which is pretty classless if you ask me.
I wasn’t talking about Serbian governments. More amount the ATP or Australia or America policies. If he believes in something he sticks to it which I respect. We have to respect his way on life and how what he thinks is best for him and his body.He doesn't have his own mind, his thinking is one of a typical uneducated, brain-washed Serbian person. He has the mind of the mases(only Serbian ones). He is everything but anti-establishment, he has been friendly with every Serbian government so far, including the current de facto mafia government led by a former Milosevic' associate.
nothing left to take away
I didn't say they make incendiary statements, just that they have toned them down a lot from the early yearsNah, it is true. Djokovic's family has made incendiary statements many, many times through his career and not just about Federer. They have compared Djokovic to Jesus and Spartacus and said he was on a crusade against the 'decadent West.'
They keep doing all of this and Novak doesn't say a word. People can make the connection and see that Djokovic's closest representatives all do this and that maybe he's quite fine with it.
Tomato, tomahtoBy the way, Federer told Djokovic's box "to be quiet" not to shut up
I didn't say they make incendiary statements, just that they have toned them down a lot from the early years
Tomato, tomahto
I wasn’t talking about Serbian governments. More amount the ATP or Australia or America policies. If he believes in something he sticks to it which I respect. We have to respect his way on life and how what he thinks is best for him and his body.
You were talking about him having his own mind and being anti-establishment. I explained why is that not the case(it's completely opposite actually). He's just a part of a different establishment, and his way of thinking is typical for many if not most people in his country.
Djokovic's fans live in the land of make believe.You act like Djokovic dominated them both. His H2H against Nadal is 30-29 and against Fed it's 27-23.
All of this is from Srdjan“Tonight they can throw him in a dungeon; tomorrow they can put him in chains. The truth is he is like water and water paves its own path. Novak is the Spartacus of the new world which won’t tolerate injustice, colonialism and hypocrisy.”
“Jesus was crucified on the cross but he is still alive among us. They are trying to crucify and belittle Novak and throw him to his knees...Novak is the best player and the best athlete in the world, but several hundred million people from the West can’t stomach that.”
"I call on the Queen of Britain, Elizabeth, the leader of the Commonwealth, to intervene and protect the human rights of my son Novak Djokovic and to stop the political prosecution that has been carried out against him since he came to Australia"
"The attempt to assassinate the best athlete in the world has ended. 50 bullets in Novak's chest."
All of this is from Srdjan
All of this is from Srdjan
This is honestly so overdramatic that it's hard to take it too seriously“Tonight they can throw him in a dungeon; tomorrow they can put him in chains. The truth is he is like water and water paves its own path. Novak is the Spartacus of the new world which won’t tolerate injustice, colonialism and hypocrisy.”
“Jesus was crucified on the cross but he is still alive among us. They are trying to crucify and belittle Novak and throw him to his knees...Novak is the best player and the best athlete in the world, but several hundred million people from the West can’t stomach that.”
"I call on the Queen of Britain, Elizabeth, the leader of the Commonwealth, to intervene and protect the human rights of my son Novak Djokovic and to stop the political prosecution that has been carried out against him since he came to Australia"
"The attempt to assassinate the best athlete in the world has ended. 50 bullets in Novak's chest."
This is honestly so overdramatic that it's hard to take it too seriously
What outrageous things have they said about Nadal? For that matter, what "outrageous" things have they said about FEDERER (who they don't even like)?The Djerkovic family has done everything but "tone it down" over the years. If anything, their mouths have gotten even bigger, embarrassing, and ignorant, while Djesus just sits there and says nothing. They have said some outrageous things about Federer and Nadal over the years and have shown no signs of stopping. Their behavior has been abhorrent for at least 15 years, and to pretend otherwise is just pathetic. Does anyone remember the Djerkovic's throwing a damn party during the rain delay during the final of RG in 2012 because they thought they had already won? I certainly do, and they did it with Rafa's family right next to them. Disgusting family, period.
What outrageous things have they said about Nadal?
This is honestly so overdramatic that it's hard to take it too seriously
This is really stretching the definition of "outrageous" here, specially the bit he said about Federer.Srjdan in 2013:
“Rafael Nadal was Novak’s best friend while he was winning. When things changed, they were no longer friends. This is not sport. This is what Novak has in him, and they [Nadal and Federer] don’t have.”
“Federer....as a man he’s the opposite. He attacked Novak at the Davis Cup in Geneva, he realized that he was his successor and was trying to discredit him in every way. Novak’s success is an amazing thing and something that one can not understand.”
Nadal responded:
“If he wants to know how I get along with Nole, he should better ask his son. My relationship with him [Novak] has always been very good and it still is. I’ve lost lots of matches against him and vice-versa, but we’ve never had a problem. People are entitled to their opinions. It’s not my place to respond to anyone, especially without having heard or read these comments.”
This is really stretching the definition of "outrageous" here, specially the bit he said about Federer
The first time Fed met Novak was in a DC tie between Serbia and Switzerland. Novak took an MTO, and Fed had some unkind words to say because of it. This is the root of the animosity between Federer and Djokovic's familyIt's pretty outrageous that a player's father make claims like these, but again, given how you've shifted the goalpost every time, I'm not surprised you don't see it.
Rest assured that this and many other incidents only some of which have been touched on today, have played their role in making Djokovic a very unappealing character to many people to the point that he got booed just for stepping on the court at a slam.
I find it hilarious when right-wingers are labeled (or label themselves) anti-establishment.Do nothing different. The guy has been a joy to watch on court and I like his off court personality as well. I wouldn’t want him to change. I like how he has his own mind and is anti-establishment on different matters.
The first time Fed met Novak was in a DC tie between Serbia and Switzerland. Novak took an MTO, and Fed had some unkind words to say because of it. This is the root of the animosity between Federer and Djokovic's family
What Srdjan said was not all that outrageous considering Fed fired the first shot in their feud
The first time Fed met Novak was in a DC tie between Serbia and Switzerland. Novak took an MTO, and Fed had some unkind words to say because of it. This is the root of the animosity between Federer and Djokovic's family
But did he leave it too late. He only started beating them at Majors many years after the Fedal rivalry had got going. He was beating them on hard regularly as far back as 2006 but this is why Slams are so big as people just judge off slams. Im not sure 2011 onwards Nadal or Federer were as good as they were at their peak.He did what he had to do. Beat the other two. Tennis is a sport, a competition. Not a popularity contest.
Without Novak around today we would consider 2011 as Nadal’s greatest seasonBut did he leave it too late. He only started beating them at Majors many years after the Fedal rivalry had got going. He was beating them on hard regularly as far back as 2006 but this is why Slams are so big as people just judge off slams. Im not sure 2011 onwards Nadal or Federer were as good as they were at their peak.
Djokovic is a great guy. Great role model. Great player. He probably suffered from Murray not fulfilling his talent as i remember way back in 2008 it was said Djokovic v Murray would be the next great rivalry after Fedal. Never happened as Djokovic obviously was a league above Murray so in terms of a rivalry he was duking out with Fedal.
Djokovic didn’t become the big dog due to any FEDAL decline. 2011 smacked them in the face. That level just wasn’t sustainable tho and by the time Djokovic settled into his longer term form (2015+), Fed actually had declined and Novak was too good for Rafa off clay.Djokovic has suffered from a popularity deficit relative to Federer and Nadal, who preceded him at the top and overlapped many years on the big stage.
Part of the problem, it seems to me, is that Novak’s rise to #1 seemed come due to the decline of Fedal, because he was #3 fiddle,
If djokovic had been Alcaraz or Tsonga or Delpo doing the same (results wise) to Fedal he would have been popular and many fans would have abandoned Fedal.
The alleged need to "distance" oneself from anything someone else said or did (no matter if family, friends or whoever) is a ridiculous concept I could never take seriously.Are you actually asking me why in the court of public opinion would it matter to people that Djokovic's mother, father, wife and brother made outrageous statements and decisions repeatedly without him ever intervening to distance himself from those positions or to press those responsible to refrain from doing so?
The question answers itself. It's also very easy and convenient to have your closest allies say the incendiary things that you also believe and would like said but want to maintain a paper thin separation between the statements and your person.
I am going to guess that Djokovic's family helped make him disliked by a decent number of people. The 'king is dead' stuff directed at Federer was low class as was all of Srjdan's many statements to the press about Federer and Nadal in addition to the family later inviting an extremist like Nigel Farage to represent them and comparing Novak to Jesus and Spartacus.
His delusional and cocky statement that he was in control of the match at RG 2006 when he retired at 2 sets down against Nadal was another early clue.
Novak being so openly friendly with extreme right-wing nationalists in Serbia and singing and hugging them at weddings etc (while himself evading taxes and living in Monaco) surely added fuel to the fire for anyone paying attention.
Let's also not forget telling a crowd to eat his ----- or screaming at ball kids, smashing his racquet many times, launching it into the crowd at the Olympics and abandoning his mixed doubles partner there too.
Frankly, he's lucky that a lot of what he and his family does isn't covered much outside of Serbia and that his worst curses are in Serbian.
The alleged need to "distance" oneself from anything someone else said or did (no matter if family, friends or whoever) is a ridiculous concept I could never take seriously.
It’s like reversing the burden of proof in a court. It’s the same concept as "guilty until proven otherwise".
I assure you that I never thought something like "His surroundings say so, and he never distanced himself from it, so he thinks the same" about anyone.
And I never actively "distanced myself" from anything in my life. There is no need for it, and anyone who does it supports a wrong concept. Of course if someone asks me about my opinion on a controversial topic I may say it, but not in anticipatory obedience out of myself.
And even then I would never distance myself from the PERSON who said things I don’t agree with. Not only because of a different opinion. That would be another fallacy: "Oh, he doesn’t distance himself from that person, so he must support his views."
No, absolutely not. At least not necessarily. But in any case I would support anyone’s right to tell his/her opinion, without any censorship.
Don't smash rackets, spank balls into crowd, shout cusswords at your own box, display angry outbursts at umpires & ball boys / boy girls, hit balls in the direction of karen line judges, advice family to speak ill of other greats,Djokovic has suffered from a popularity deficit relative to Federer and Nadal, who preceded him at the top and overlapped many years on the big stage.
Part of the problem, it seems to me, is that Novak’s rise to #1 seemed come due to the decline of Fedal, because he was #3 fiddle, or even #4 when Murray was on the rise, for so long.
My question is, is there anything Novak could have done, on-court performance aside, during his ascent, that would have made the public view him differently?
Could he have used Muhammad Ali style bold boasts to influence opinions? Could he have cultivated a chosen-one hero image better? Or maybe a heel image? What should he have done?!!!
When?*mimicking other players in jest but not like it when other players did it back to him
Roddick? This guy mellowed out a lot since retirement but he was the ultimate jerk when he was an active player.his antics were further highlighted outspoken players like roddick teasing him.
roddick and djoker got into a imitation war I think, annoying djoker.When?
Roddick? This guy mellowed out a lot since retirement but he was the ultimate jerk when he was an active player.