Jay Sean
Rookie
Also, from what to what racquet did you go from and to? Any close contenders or tough decisions? Any you thought along the way that would be up your alley based on the specs or reviews that ended up being terrible for you?
Elaborate as much as you want about why you liked this/that racquet. Would love to hear. Might help my journey. Can be a rabbit hole...
Personally, in the last 4-5 years, I've had the Aeropro Drive > Prince Textreme 95 > Pro Staff Autograph.
I was more so a 4.0 player around the time of the APD. Maybe slightly less but that rating covers a lot of decent tennis players. I'm more so a 4.5 now and was towards the end of my time with the Textreme 95. I started to dislike the thick beams on the APD and felt I almost had to hit spinny balls and couldn't simply plow through. I started to consider a flexier racquet, I just wanted something pretty different and a little heavier. So I went with that 95. Loved it for a while but then wanted heavier and went with the 97.
Now, feeling that it's a bit heavy and maybe the 16x19 is a little too bouncy for my taste. Maybe the racquet it slightly too powerful as well.
I'm going through a change of racquets. Currently hit with the Autograph Pro Staff (All Black) but custom painted actually but that's no matter. Some grip mods I do so all in all, my RF97 Autographs are right around 12.9 oz. I fell in love with the plow through. Psychologically, I felt the hefty weight would be a good thing to try and get used to. Figured more weight means I will HAVE TO refine little details about my swing path and take-back, etc. So I stuck by it. I grew as a tennis player with it. The weight exploited some things about my techniques that needed to change.
Funny, now, I feel the weight enables certain lazy tendencies. I can rely on it to plow through balls somewhat. Laziness in this way can mean you slack on your form and posture, etc, because the sheer weight of this racquet will somewhat compensate for that and offer a default level of stability. That being said, I have the idea now that I would prefer 18x20 and something just a little bit lighter.
Ever feel that some racquets or strings, the harder you hit, the more the ball just digs into the racquet/strings and doesn't actually go any harder or faster? Certain racquets have felt this way for me, almost as if a cap was put on how hard I can physically hit the ball or go through it. I imagine the physics of the 18x20 to allow for a looser string-bed that won't trampoline quite as much and I can more easily hit harder, flatter balls if necessary.
Currently enjoying some demos of the new blade 98 18x20, the Yonex Vcore 97HD and the Head Gravity Pro. All racquets to come out very recently.
Elaborate as much as you want about why you liked this/that racquet. Would love to hear. Might help my journey. Can be a rabbit hole...
Personally, in the last 4-5 years, I've had the Aeropro Drive > Prince Textreme 95 > Pro Staff Autograph.
I was more so a 4.0 player around the time of the APD. Maybe slightly less but that rating covers a lot of decent tennis players. I'm more so a 4.5 now and was towards the end of my time with the Textreme 95. I started to dislike the thick beams on the APD and felt I almost had to hit spinny balls and couldn't simply plow through. I started to consider a flexier racquet, I just wanted something pretty different and a little heavier. So I went with that 95. Loved it for a while but then wanted heavier and went with the 97.
Now, feeling that it's a bit heavy and maybe the 16x19 is a little too bouncy for my taste. Maybe the racquet it slightly too powerful as well.
I'm going through a change of racquets. Currently hit with the Autograph Pro Staff (All Black) but custom painted actually but that's no matter. Some grip mods I do so all in all, my RF97 Autographs are right around 12.9 oz. I fell in love with the plow through. Psychologically, I felt the hefty weight would be a good thing to try and get used to. Figured more weight means I will HAVE TO refine little details about my swing path and take-back, etc. So I stuck by it. I grew as a tennis player with it. The weight exploited some things about my techniques that needed to change.
Funny, now, I feel the weight enables certain lazy tendencies. I can rely on it to plow through balls somewhat. Laziness in this way can mean you slack on your form and posture, etc, because the sheer weight of this racquet will somewhat compensate for that and offer a default level of stability. That being said, I have the idea now that I would prefer 18x20 and something just a little bit lighter.
Ever feel that some racquets or strings, the harder you hit, the more the ball just digs into the racquet/strings and doesn't actually go any harder or faster? Certain racquets have felt this way for me, almost as if a cap was put on how hard I can physically hit the ball or go through it. I imagine the physics of the 18x20 to allow for a looser string-bed that won't trampoline quite as much and I can more easily hit harder, flatter balls if necessary.
Currently enjoying some demos of the new blade 98 18x20, the Yonex Vcore 97HD and the Head Gravity Pro. All racquets to come out very recently.