BGod
G.O.A.T.
Both in 2001 where I think he had the best opportunity at both. Obviously in the final against Goran there were chances in the 5th but I think he'd have been better winning the 3rd and taking the match in 4. Then the Agassi match was a killer because he was up 2-1 and even though it was a semifinal he almost certainly beats Clement.
I think this hypothetical carries a lot of features:
1. He would have 4 Slams, which of course is a separate of sorts, tying him with Courier, Vilas for OE (Rosewall too but he won more prior).
2. He would have 3 of 4, something only 10 players in the achieved in the OE prior to his retirement and only 4 more after. The difference here being Borg, McEnroe and Courier not doing this and Vilas/Newcombe accomplishing this in a much weaker AO era.
3. Maybe ends up with YE #1 which he never did or another YE #2 and almost certainly more weeks at #1.
I think he would have been held above Courier and Vilas in my mind but perhaps I'm wrong. He would of had an even more impressive record against Agassi in big matches for one and a novelty of 4-1 Slam Finals record.
I think this hypothetical carries a lot of features:
1. He would have 4 Slams, which of course is a separate of sorts, tying him with Courier, Vilas for OE (Rosewall too but he won more prior).
2. He would have 3 of 4, something only 10 players in the achieved in the OE prior to his retirement and only 4 more after. The difference here being Borg, McEnroe and Courier not doing this and Vilas/Newcombe accomplishing this in a much weaker AO era.
3. Maybe ends up with YE #1 which he never did or another YE #2 and almost certainly more weeks at #1.
I think he would have been held above Courier and Vilas in my mind but perhaps I'm wrong. He would of had an even more impressive record against Agassi in big matches for one and a novelty of 4-1 Slam Finals record.