Which company has the best quality control?

chrisak47

Banned
...I hate it when people don't read the whole thread and post something so out of place...Ahem...ROGER_FEDERER...

If I were to rank them here is the order:

1. Fischer
2. Yonex
3. Volkl
4. ProKennex
5. Prince
6. Babolat
7. Head
8. Wilson

I would actually really recommend Yonex for how much quality control their factories have! If you want to go more with domestic brands...ProKennex, Prince, and Fischer are all great brands.

For European brands...Volkl...
 

AndrewD

Legend
chrisak47 said:
If you want to go more with domestic brands...ProKennex, Prince, and Fischer are all great brands.

For European brands...Volkl...

Fischer is a European brand and ProKennex is Asian.
 

jonolau

Legend
AndrewD said:
Fischer is a European brand and ProKennex is Asian.
Hi Andrew,

Isn't Pro Kennex an American brand? If I'm not wrong, their HQ is located in Romona, California.

Jon
 

thejuice

Hall of Fame
Offshore said:
Yes, Pro Kennex is a private company located in Carlsbad, CA

Their headquarters is in California but their racquets are made in Taiwan. Regardless of that fact, I think PK has great quality control. I have three Redondos and their specs are all eerily close.
 

Athans87

New User
Yonex, as it is the only company that still produces in-house (if I remember correctly). All other companies outsource and have their products made in China.
 
I just got 2 Tecnifibre 325 and I got pretty impressed! First of all they are identical (weight and balance) and they look really great.

So I would say that Yonex and Tecnifibre look like the best quality control companies to me.
 

SFrazeur

Legend
Some times I think Wilson's Quality Control manager must work by the philosophy that "variety is the spice of life".
 

White_Rice

Rookie
I don't understand how companies can mess up in the throughput process and have deviations by that much among similar racquets. Do they not check each one they produce -- weigh them and test other specs?
 

Zverev

Professional
anyone but not Yonex

One of the MP Tour 5s, I bought, was 18 grams overweight.
Thanks but no Yonex.
Volkl was right on target...as well as Wilson's PS 7.1
 

hummer23

Hall of Fame
Ive had a pair of volkls that played very differently, one was 15 grams heavier unstrung than the other, same grips. I guess you have to get lucky . . .
 

Askmeo88

Rookie
One of the MP Tour 5s, I bought, was 18 grams overweight.
Thanks but no Yonex.
Volkl was right on target...as well as Wilson's PS 7.1

Was the MP Tour 5 you bought of different gripsizes? With that model, and some other earlier ones, there was a very definite difference in mass with different gripsizes. Yonex would distinguish them as UL (Ultra Light) or SL (Super Light) racquets.
 

Zverev

Professional
Was the MP Tour 5 you bought of different gripsizes? With that model, and some other earlier ones, there was a very definite difference in mass with different gripsizes. Yonex would distinguish them as UL (Ultra Light) or SL (Super Light) racquets.

No, they were same grip size.
Fortunately, TW had replaced the heavy one as it was totally unmanageable.
Another bad experience I had with Head Classic Tour - around 12 grams overweight. With this one I have cut the bumper guard and removed the paint from 10-2, instead used permanent marker - could use it after that.
 

chaz_233

Rookie
What about Heads made in Austria and Czech Republic? Yes, some are Chinese, but not all.

Yonex, as it is the only company that still produces in-house (if I remember correctly). All other companies outsource and have their products made in China.
 

esrb

Rookie
What is the bottom of this?
One thing is QC and we can handle that but, 5 grams will make your game different when switching racquets?
BTW I play with as couple of Volks 8CatVE that are exactly the same even though they were bought in different places and time. Thanks userman1!!
 

Tennis Man

Hall of Fame
It's nice to have this topic surface every month. I wish the QC would change that often as well. Here are my picks:

1. Yonex (hands down, I love my RDX 500 Mid collection)
............
97. Prince
98. Head
99. Wilson (haven't seen a pair of "identical" frames so far)
 
Last edited:

Steve Huff

G.O.A.T.
People slam Prince a lot, but I've strung a lot of different rackets. Regarding their TT Hornet OS, I'd bet 90% of these rackets I've strung weigh exactly 9.9 oz strung. That's pretty consistent.
 

mmuubb

Rookie
I've been playing Dunlops for the last couple of years, and I've measured them each time I bought new. HM 100g were within 2 grams(two of them, my friends were also within 2 grams of each other as well as of mine), HM 200g were exactly the same(also two), and m-fils 200 were within 4 grams( we measured six of them). I guess thats pretty good, isn't it? Or am I just lucky?
 
Dunlop have shocking standards of QC.
Fischer probably has the best but as most factories employ Taiwanese agents that vist one of three main Chinese factories every six weeks or so it's a pot shot depending on the QC agent.
 

pshulam

Hall of Fame
I've been playing Dunlops for the last couple of years, and I've measured them each time I bought new. HM 100g were within 2 grams(two of them, my friends were also within 2 grams of each other as well as of mine), HM 200g were exactly the same(also two), and m-fils 200 were within 4 grams( we measured six of them). I guess thats pretty good, isn't it? Or am I just lucky?
That's quite good. They must have used statistical process control (SPC) to control their manufacturing process.
 
Top