It wasn't Nadal. It was Guadio. There's no shame in losing to Nadal but Coria felt he was better than Gaudio so losing to him in the way Coria did really broke himI remember Coria was the King of Clay until Nadal destroyed his confidence and he was never the same again.
Nadal didn't destroy Coria's confidence. LOL
He was having all sorts of issues, none more so than problems with his wife, who was cheating on him (prior had been at all of his matches). He also had elbow, back and shoulder problems all out of seemingly nowhere.
Wasn't it with his coach as well? She was quite stunning if I recall.
Gabriela Sabatini had the yips on her serve pretty bad, really preventing her from the predicted rivalry she was thought to have had with Steffi.
It wasn't Nadal. It was Guadio. There's no shame in losing to Nadal but Coria felt he was better than Gaudio so losing to him in the way Coria did really broke him
She was not the same after blowing that lead to Mary Joe at the French open.Gabriela Sabatini had the yips on her serve pretty bad, really preventing her from the predicted rivalry she was thought to have had with Steffi.
Well her serve was awful to start with...
Coria and Gaudio hated each other since they were kids playing against each other in local tourneys. I’m still surprised they hugged after the infamous French Open Final in ‘04 lolI remember Coria's hilarious matches against Mathieu and Kiefer at Monte-Carlo in 2006.
Against Mathieu he was trailing 1-6 1-5, but fought back to win despite serving 20 double faults. Then in the next round he served 23 double faults en-route to beating Kiefer in quite a bad blooded match.
Bad blooded matches were of course a common occurrence for Coria; see his matches against Gaudio at Vina del Mar and Buenos Aires in 2001 and Hamburg in 2003, Horna at Hamburg in 2004, against Hewitt in the Davis Cup in 2005, Massu at the US Open in 2005, Gonzalez at Madrid in 2005 etc.
Refresh my memory on this. I vaguely remember this as a thing, but I can’t remember anything beyond that.Does Wilander count? Cause it would be him.
Refresh my memory on this. I vaguely remember this as a thing, but I can’t remember anything beyond that.
It wasn't Nadal. It was Guadio. There's no shame in losing to Nadal but Coria felt he was better than Gaudio so losing to him in the way Coria did really broke him
Does Wilander count? Cause it would be him.
Well he won 3 Slams in 1988 doing something nobody had done since Laver in 69. Never makes another Slam Final and only 1 Semi. Basically retires from age 27-29 then attempts unsuccessful comeback. Word is after narrowly avoiding a doomed flight (Pan Am 103) end of 88 and losing his father the next year he was mentally shot. And I mean at 24 to have a monumental season and be at 7 Slams there's really only a few guys who plummeted in the same fashion. McEnroe after 84 might be another situation but that was partially drug use, changing equipment (he used wood), better younger players, etc.
On the surface there's really no reason why Mats should have imploded in his age 25-28 seasons.
Well he won 3 Slams in 1988 doing something nobody had done since Laver in 69. Never makes another Slam Final and only 1 Semi. Basically retires from age 27-29 then attempts unsuccessful comeback. Word is after narrowly avoiding a doomed flight (Pan Am 103) end of 88 and losing his father the next year he was mentally shot. And I mean at 24 to have a monumental season and be at 7 Slams there's really only a few guys who plummeted in the same fashion. McEnroe after 84 might be another situation but that was partially drug use, changing equipment (he used wood), better younger players, etc.
On the surface there's really no reason why Mats should have imploded in his age 25-28 seasons.
That must have made the loss even harder to take for Coria.Coria and Gaudio hated each other since they were kids playing against each other in local tourneys. I’m still surprised they hugged after the infamous French Open Final in ‘04 lol
Those are his words, at least.Wilander never got the yips. He just packed it in mentally and physically after the '88 season. He'd achieved all he was ever going to. He was never going to win Wimbledon, had all the money and fame he could ever need, and nobody bothered busting their humps too hard chasing slam counts in those days. Even bothering to count them wasn't a thing until Sampras turned it into a fetish.
Wilander simply checked out, just like Borg before him.
So true. Once if you had a Slam, you were a champion. If you were a multiple grand slam winner, you were a great champion.Even bothering to count them wasn't a thing until Sampras turned it into a fetish.
This is how fanboys ruin a sportSo true. Once if you had a Slam, you were a champion. If you were a multiple grand slam winner, you were a great champion.
Now tennis seems to be a race to records for three guys. Even if winning 20 GS or so or 13 GS in ONE tournament is something huge, tennis should not be reduced to this.
Nadal didn't destroy Coria's confidence. LOL
He was having all sorts of issues, none more so than problems with his wife, who was cheating on him (prior had been at all of his matches). He also had elbow, back and shoulder problems all out of seemingly nowhere.
That must have made the loss even harder to take for Coria.
I feel that Wilander really tried to play well in 1989. You can't tell me he's not trying against Sampras in the 2nd round USO match in 1989 or in the lead up to the tournament (e.g., in Cincinnati). Or that he wasn't trying at Wimbledon that year (where he played quite well).
But he was distracted and making unforced errors. Call it whatever you want.
At some point in 1990 though he definitely checked out.
I remember Coria's hilarious matches against Mathieu and Kiefer at Monte-Carlo in 2006.
Against Mathieu he was trailing 1-6 1-5, but fought back to win despite serving 20 double faults. Then in the next round he served 23 double faults en-route to beating Kiefer in quite a bad blooded match.
Bad blooded matches were of course a common occurrence for Coria; see his matches against Gaudio at Vina del Mar and Buenos Aires in 2001 and Hamburg in 2003, Horna at Hamburg in 2004, against Hewitt in the Davis Cup in 2005, Massu at the US Open in 2005, Gonzalez at Madrid in 2005 etc.
not necessarily:You aren't the king of anything without a single slam title on it.
Wilander was motivated for Wimbledon in 1989, certainly, and perhaps Davis Cup (loss to Skoff), but he seemed to check out mentally for much of the year. His wife, Sonya Mulholland, mentioned it too. Wilander seemed to carry on in tennis out of habit until Santoro embarrassed him at the 1991 French Open and then he was off tour for what ended up being 2 years. He watched some US Open matches from the stands while he was away, though.
I'm curious about Sonya though. Do you have a link -- I guess no -- or something?
As for the Santoro match, funny that you mention it, I wonder who remembers it really, but it gave me nightmares for years. There's one question that I would have liked to ask to Mats : what happened to you that day? It's one thing to not care about something. The Sampras match or the Chesnokov match in RG also in 1989 were a good example of not trying hard. But that match against Santoro in 1991, I have never ever understood why and how he played so poorly. And his gesture at the end of the match saying that it was over…
Too bad at the age of 26. Two years ago he said that he wished he hadn't quit the game so young.
Yes! I remember that business about his wife! awfulNadal didn't destroy Coria's confidence. LOL
He was having all sorts of issues, none more so than problems with his wife, who was cheating on him (prior had been at all of his matches). He also had elbow, back and shoulder problems all out of seemingly nowhere.
SUDDENLY, A DOOR-MATS
Happiness is a thick, paralyzing pastry settling clown on one's everyday life.—Ingmar Bergman Mats Wilander's soul is not stricken. He doesn't suffer fromvault.si.com
Santoro had a knack of doing it in his career on occasion, i.e. embarrassing great players, most famously Safin.
Santoro's nemesis, who he never beat, was Kafelnikov. "You'll never beat me, Fabrice", Kafelnikov once said to him.
Mats obviously couldn't find that goal or motivation to keep him going once he got to world number 1 and had won 3 of the 4 majors. I do wonder about the mental effects he had from Pam-Am Flight 103 as well. Like the actress Kim Cattrall, Mats Wilander had reservation on the flight but didn't get on, narrowly cheating death on the plane that exploded over Lockerbie on 21 December 1988.
Her serve sucked because she played with 400sw. But her touch was pretty good.Well her serve was awful to start with...
Word is after narrowly avoiding a doomed flight (Pan Am 103) end of 88 and losing his father the next year he was mentally shot. And I mean at 24 to have a monumental season and be at 7 Slams there's really only a few guys who plummeted in the same fashion. McEnroe after 84 might be another situation but that was partially drug use, changing equipment (he used wood), better younger players, etc.
That's a great article that you've shared here @Mustard, thank you very much! I already knew pretty much all -- expect maybe the party at Keith Richards' the night after the 1988 US Open, might have been quite something! -- but it's very valuable to have an insight about what happened to Mats after 1988, especially form his wife and friends. Thank you again.SUDDENLY, A DOOR-MATS
Happiness is a thick, paralyzing pastry settling clown on one's everyday life.—Ingmar Bergman Mats Wilander's soul is not stricken. He doesn't suffer fromvault.si.com
Santoro had a knack of doing it in his career on occasion, i.e. embarrassing great players, most famously Safin.
I think it is vastly ignored that drugs probably played a big role in the decline of many athletes in the 70s, 80s and also 90s in tennis and other sports. It wasn't just McEnroe doing them. Wilander tested positive for cocaine once and we all know about Agassi's meth phase so I am sure many other players didn't just drink milk when they went out. That being said many players at that time hit their peak at the age of 24/25 and then slowly and in some cases quicly burned out and lost all motivation. Some of that might have been caused by their life stlyle, by injuries or simply because they didn't have the modern treatment and training players have nowadays. The tour planning might have also been a bigger issue then. McEnroe, Wilander, Borg, Becker, Courier, Agassi, Stich, Cash and even Edberg went through a down spiral in their early/mid 20s and only Agassi and partly Becker recoverd from it. Even Connors went through this phase in the late 70s but he was obviously more consistent than the rest.
That, I can agree with.not necessarily:
I think it is vastly ignored that drugs probably played a big role in the decline of many athletes in the 70s, 80s and also 90s in tennis and other sports. It wasn't just McEnroe doing them. Wilander tested positive for cocaine once and we all know about Agassi's meth phase so I am sure many other players didn't just drink milk when they went out. That being said many players at that time hit their peak at the age of 24/25 and then slowly and in some cases quicly burned out and lost all motivation. Some of that might have been caused by their life stlyle, by injuries or simply because they didn't have the modern treatment and training players have nowadays. The tour planning might have also been a bigger issue then. McEnroe, Wilander, Borg, Becker, Courier, Agassi, Stich, Cash and even Edberg went through a down spiral in their early/mid 20s and only Agassi and partly Becker recoverd from it. Even Connors went through this phase in the late 70s but he was obviously more consistent than the rest.