Surface conditions aside, I think Rafa needs match play to get going and build up confidence. He does not get that leading up to AO.Nadal was surprisingly the least winning Australian Open
Only once did he win that bounce low court at the Australian Open.
Why do you think that?
i'm still glad nadal won 09 AO at that time
even , i was fed fan at that time
How is AO court anything like The O2. Hes reached 5 finals at AO. Beaten fed there 3 times. Its not like London O2. Its not as fast.Same reason he has zero WTF titles, because fast hard courts are his worst surface.
I would sooner bet on him winning another Wimbledon than another AO.
Even at his peak when Fed was his pigeon, he has been vulnerable on fast HCs, especially indoor.
Same reason he has zero WTF titles, because fast hard courts are his worst surface.
I would sooner bet on him winning another Wimbledon than another AO.
Even at his peak when Fed was his pigeon, he has been vulnerable on fast HCs, especially indoor.
How is AO court anything like The O2. Hes reached 5 finals at AO. Beaten fed there 3 times. Its not like London O2. Its not as fast.
Hes been much worse at O2 than AO
I don't agree. How many WTF finals has he been in, one maybe? So he had minimal chances of bagging a WTF title!
He has been in 4 AO finals since winning his only one. And two of those, he was the betting favorite midway thru the fifth! He probably should've won one more, and might've won two more!
he win that bounce low
Because he choked 3 winnable finals:
1) Losing against Djokovic from break up.
2) Panic attack against Wawrinka while gunning for the slam record, facing unexpected resistance, tried to hide it behind injury. Probably biggest choke of Nadal's career, he's never mentally collapsed like that.
3) Losing against Federer from break up.
a big illusion to think he would win anyway..7-6 7-6 7-6 round before with birdman,..machanThe AO final against Wawrinka was a choke? What the hell are you talking? He was blasted right off the court by Wawrinka. That was anything but a choke. I don't know if the injury was real but injured or not, he was going to lose. Wawrinka played top tennis!
a big illusion to think he would win anyway..7-6 7-6 7-6 round before with birdman,..machan
Before UO 2017, I would say Nadal's 2nd best slam was AO. Now I'm saying 3rd, but the thing is AO draws for Nadal have not been as not hard as UO. For me it feels like a destiny.Nadal was surprisingly the least winning Australian Open
Only once did he win that bounce low court at the Australian Open.
Why do you think that?
i'm still glad nadal won 09 AO at that time
even , i was fed fan at that time
It's not complicated if you just look at it year-by-year
2005: not good enough (he wasn't getting through Nalbandian-Roddick-Safin at 18 even if he outlasted Hewitt in that 5th)
2006: injured
2007: not good enough (zoning Gonzo)
2008: not good enough (zoning Jo)
2009: took everything had just to win this one
2010: injured (would've been the favorite if healthy)
2011: injured (wasn't beating Novak anyway)
2012: missed that bunt down the line. But it's not like that was match point.
2013: injured
2014: injured + Stan was great
2015: not good enough
2016: not good enough
2017: Random Fedr backhand god mode
2018: injured (idk if he would've beaten Fed anyway)
2019: even if he came in firing 100% on offense and defense, he wasn't beating that Novak
2020: again, wasn't beating Novak even if he got past Timmy
So I know it's an awful excuse but I almost wanna say "unlucky", I mean in a coin flip he would have won just one of 2012 and 2017.
That just made me laugh2017: Random Fedr backhand god mode
Lolbut the thing is AO draws for Nadal have not been as not hard as UO. For me it feels like a destiny.
How is AO court anything like The O2. Hes reached 5 finals at AO. Beaten fed there 3 times. Its not like London O2. Its not asfastlow.
Hes been much worse at O2 than AO
Before UO 2017, I would say Nadal's 2nd best slam was AO. Now I'm saying 3rd, but the thing is AO draws for Nadal have not been as not hard as UO. For me it feels like a destiny.
Nadal is destined to not win another AO
Another example is how I do feel that, Federer is destined, to not win another UO,.
So I know it's an awful excuse but I almost wanna say "unlucky", I mean in a coin flip he would have won just one of 2012 and 2017.
All I know is I really enjoyed watching 2009 AO Nadal2010 - outplayed by a peaking Murray, and injured
2011 - outplayed by a peaking Daveed, and injured
2012 - lost one of the greatest matches of all time
2013 - absent
2014 - outplayed by a peaking Stan, and injured
2015 - absolutely ROFLstomped by a peaking Berd, probably not injured
2016 - Dasco got revenge for 2009
2017 - lost one of the most historically important matches of all time
2018 - lost to a peaking Cilic, and injured
2019 - sent to the shadowrealm by a peaking and unstoppable Novak, didn’t lose a set until the final
2020 - lost to a peaking Tim, probably not injured
2021 - choked a two set lead to Sissypas, probably just tired from being old and not injured
that about cover it?