Context? The original title was " The thoughest draw of all time " iirc?
BrokenGears Semi-Pro May 27, 2021 #551 mike danny said: Context? Click to expand... The original title was " The thoughest draw of all time " iirc?
mike danny said: Context? Click to expand... The original title was " The thoughest draw of all time " iirc?
Breakpointerer Legend May 27, 2021 #552 mike danny said: Context? Click to expand... The original title was "thoughtest draw" instead of toughest
mike danny said: Context? Click to expand... The original title was "thoughtest draw" instead of toughest
mike danny Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #553 Breakpointerer said: The original title was "thoughtest draw" instead of toughest Click to expand... Mods, why U no fun?
Breakpointerer said: The original title was "thoughtest draw" instead of toughest Click to expand... Mods, why U no fun?
Federer and Del Potro Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #554 BrokenGears said: No, it was all completely serious. Most definitely. Just like how the average @Federer and Del Potro post is always exactly right. Click to expand... Those predictions on your original profile are my proudest work in my time here.
BrokenGears said: No, it was all completely serious. Most definitely. Just like how the average @Federer and Del Potro post is always exactly right. Click to expand... Those predictions on your original profile are my proudest work in my time here.
BrokenGears Semi-Pro May 27, 2021 #555 Federer and Del Potro said: Those predictions on your original profile are my proudest work in my time here. Click to expand... Proud that my profile was the home of your best work. Those predictions were legendary.
Federer and Del Potro said: Those predictions on your original profile are my proudest work in my time here. Click to expand... Proud that my profile was the home of your best work. Those predictions were legendary.
NatF Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #556 Martin J said: He is deadly wrong here, Thiem is much better than these two mugs. Click to expand... Second best clay baseliner I've heard, Thiem peaked super high in that 2019 final second set.
Martin J said: He is deadly wrong here, Thiem is much better than these two mugs. Click to expand... Second best clay baseliner I've heard, Thiem peaked super high in that 2019 final second set.
mike danny Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #557 NatF said: Second best clay baseliner I've heard, Thiem peaked super high in that 2019 final second set. Click to expand... Fedovic would have been trashed even worse than Thiem was.
NatF said: Second best clay baseliner I've heard, Thiem peaked super high in that 2019 final second set. Click to expand... Fedovic would have been trashed even worse than Thiem was.
Martin J Hall of Fame May 27, 2021 #558 NatF said: Second best clay baseliner I've heard, Thiem peaked super high in that 2019 final second set. Click to expand... A player with a very short, but a very high peak.
NatF said: Second best clay baseliner I've heard, Thiem peaked super high in that 2019 final second set. Click to expand... A player with a very short, but a very high peak.
NatF Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #559 mike danny said: Fedovic would have been trashed even worse than Thiem was. Click to expand... Well what happened to Djokovic the next year?
mike danny said: Fedovic would have been trashed even worse than Thiem was. Click to expand... Well what happened to Djokovic the next year?
mike danny Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #560 NatF said: Well what happened to Djokovic the next year? Click to expand... Couldn't have played any better also.
NatF said: Well what happened to Djokovic the next year? Click to expand... Couldn't have played any better also.
NatF Bionic Poster May 27, 2021 #561 mike danny said: Couldn't have played any better also. Click to expand... Never seen him dropshot so well, even better than the AO 2016 QF.
mike danny said: Couldn't have played any better also. Click to expand... Never seen him dropshot so well, even better than the AO 2016 QF.
S SonnyT Legend May 27, 2021 #563 The thoughest 4 starting matches in Slam history, without any doubt. That's why Nadal could only win 3 in 3 sets, and the other in 4!
The thoughest 4 starting matches in Slam history, without any doubt. That's why Nadal could only win 3 in 3 sets, and the other in 4!