michael valek
Hall of Fame
As soon as my phantoms arrive I will
One interesting thing - why Prince did not release 2 versions of phantom 16x18 and 18x20?
I just happened to look at the EXO3 TOUR reviews by TW. For the same racquet with only difference in string pattern, very surprisingly 18x20 was a clear winner in almost all categories, overall 83 vs 78 score...
As soon as my phantoms arrive I will
I look forward to that
On paper, there seems to be a lot of similarities. Similar weight, same head, same string pattern, thin beam. The only differences are the stiffness on the PCG at 62 (which is hardly overly stiff) and no ports.
I'm tempted by the Phantom, I'm just not sure how different it would be to my PCG100. But we shall see
One interesting thing - why Prince did not release 2 versions of phantom 16x18 and 18x20?
I just happened to look at the EXO3 TOUR reviews by TW. For the same racquet with only difference in string pattern, very surprisingly 18x20 was a clear winner in almost all categories, overall 83 vs 78 score...
What will be your final specs?
I think an 18x20 with this frame would be too low powered. This racket shines because of the spin it produces. It doesn't really lack control at all. Upping control at the cost of spin and power would be the wrong move. I think they would have to stiffen the racket some to go with a tighter stringbed. Not a direction I'd recommend.
To me the Phantom is a great racquet for groundies and volleys in an arm friendly package. I'm two weeks into the frame and my elbow hasn't felt this good in months.
My serves are still the weak point with the racquet. Spin serves great, flat serves tending to sail. But I'm sure that will come around as it gets better every time out.
Haven't had to add weight yet. I like the maneuverability stock. But I could see where a bit of polarity might help some players. I might start fooling around a bit once I've got my arm healed.
Same argument could have been made for EXO 100 which was even softer...and yet most preferred the 18x20.
Has anyone compared the Phantom vs a Textreme Tour 95? Thanks for all the POG and PCG comparisons.
Has anyone compared the Phantom vs a Textreme Tour 95? Thanks for all the POG and PCG comparisons.
I have both. Unlike many, I am finding the Phantom too powerful and getting too high a launch angle as described. The POG 100 was lower powered and more controlled in my opinion. The phantom wins on comfort by a long shot however.Has anyone compared the Phantom to the PCG100 yet?
Thanks for info Is the sweet spot on the TT 95 higher - i.e. further away from the butt of the racquet - compared with the Phantom, due to the TT 95's smaller head size and presumably higher throat bridge? Assuming this would produce more leverage, and be particularly noticeable on serves.Yes, I've owned and played with the TT 95 for about a year and a half. I ordered a Phantom 100 about a month ago and hit with it for about 2 weeks.
As much as I wanted to like the Phantom, I figured out it just wasn't for me. In my opinion, the TT 95 feels quite a bit more solid on just about every shot. Please keep in mind I'm more of an old school, flat hitter, with a S&V game. While the Phantom is a solid offering, I just feel the TT 95 was more suited to my style. I strung the Phantom 3 different ways but couldn't seem to contain the occasional "sprayed" shot. The ball would seem to just shoot off extremely high at times for no reason. It was a little strange, something I've never really dealt with before. However, the racquet is definitely comfortable and I'm sure is a great choice for most players today.
Has anyone compared the Phantom vs a Textreme Tour 95? Thanks for all the POG and PCG comparisons.
I have both. Unlike many, I am finding the Phantom too powerful and getting too high a launch angle as described. The POG 100 was lower powered and more controlled in my opinion. The phantom wins on comfort by a long shot however.
I have both. Unlike many, I am finding the Phantom too powerful and getting too high a launch angle as described. The POG 100 was lower powered and more controlled in my opinion. The phantom wins on comfort by a long shot however.
Thanks for info Is the sweet spot on the TT 95 higher - i.e. further away from the butt of the racquet - compared with the Phantom, due to the TT 95's smaller head size and presumably higher throat bridge? Assuming this would produce more leverage, and be particularly noticeable on serves.
Surprisingly, I actually found the sweet spot on the Phantom a little harder to find. I'm almost certain it was just me, but it was really strange. That's the reason I strung it up a few different ways, just to try and make sure I had covered everything I could before I made a decision. I don't know if that answers your question or helps you any. If not, I apologize. It's just tough for me to nail down much with the Phantom because my experience with it was somewhat strange. It's still a comfortable frame and will be a great fit for many players.
Surprisingly, I actually found the sweet spot on the Phantom a little harder to find. I'm almost certain it was just me, but it was really strange. That's the reason I strung it up a few different ways, just to try and make sure I had covered everything I could before I made a decision. I don't know if that answers your question or helps you any. If not, I apologize. It's just tough for me to nail down much with the Phantom because my experience with it was somewhat strange. It's still a comfortable frame and will be a great fit for many players.
It's all about managing your expectations, and appreciating the Phantom for what it is, which is a very unique racket that is fast, super comfortable, and a spin monster...there's really nothing else out there like it. And the the thin beam is straight up sweet looking.
It reminds in performance of my old Aeropro Team with 10x the comfort. And I'll take the solid thin beam construction over wide beams any day. Shanks are way more likely to land in the court with the thin beam.
For all those with more time with this racquet no one seems to be finding all the extra power with this racquet? Maybe my swing is too big? Just can't really swing out huge with this stick as I fear overhitting every time.
Your swing isn't too big, your swing is too flat. Or your racquet face is too open.
I've not had any problem hitting forehands hard and deep. But they only sail if I get the racquet face too open. Which is usually a timing issue for me.
The Phantom is a low power designed frame. I can't see how you are finding extra power. There really isn't much there compared to truly powerful frames like the Pure Drives of the world.
I had a hit of the Phantom today,it arrived yesterday in the post.
My friend asked TW to sell him the heaviest one they had,it was 322g unstrung.
He had it strung with Alu Power at 50 pound tension.
I use the Prince Tour 16 by 18 with Alu Power at 48 tension.
We both agreed the Prince Tour has more power,a higher deflection and a bigger sweet spot.
It also grips the ball better than the Phantom.
Now all that could be due to the string not having lost much tension.
The Phantom to me feels even softer than my Prince Tour. Like around 52 flex or lower.
Overall,definitely sticking with my Prince Tour.
I'm talking about reports on the unusual low paint quality reported in this threadPaint chipping? Post a picture of it. It's a racquet just like any other, when you use it it will show wear and tear.
Anyone has Phantom from TWE, and can report about the paint chipping problems?
(TWE uses different suppliers)
If it happens - is it covered by warranty?
I have been planning to order Phantoms from TWE. Now, does somebody know that they are really carrying a different batch (with worse paint) than TW? Also - TWE is announcing availability for the racquets starting Oct 22 - one would think that these would be the latest versions...?Yeah, it is a problem from personal experience. And clearly others felt the same as they felt the need to improve paint for the release at TW. And it's exacerbated by the fact that the head guard doesn't go as far down along the hoop as most rackets. Word is that all Prince Phantoms will eventually get the improved paint, and it won't be exclusive to TW US. So you could hold out and wait. Paint chips aren't generally covered under warranty, so I highly doubt it would be.
I have been planning to order Phantoms from TWE. Now, does somebody know that they are really carrying a different batch (with worse paint) than TW? Also - TWE is announcing availability for the racquets starting Oct 22 - one would think that these would be the latest versions...?
It is specific to the US Phantom right now but will be on all new Phantoms going forwards. When the original production runs sell through in Europe and the rest of the world all future production will have the updated paint.
Chris, TW