I find the conversation interesting, since one could argue that really NOTHING has been introduced technology/design-wise in the past two decades that would render a benchmark 20-25 year-old frame obsolete. I don't believe that was true before the 20-teens, certainly not at the turn of the century(although there were plenty of "classics" around 1980).
I've got a few NOS frames that are 20 years old and could easily pass muster against the designs of the 2000s. My NOS frames from the '70s/'80s wouldn't fare as well, I'm afraid(still fun to hit, of course!).
Still taking a 2nd generation Head PPPro red head (600 or US Model) to the dance. To much fun - varying pace and just total control... The new multis really fit these softer, heavier beauties, IMHO...
I have one of these! Rocket launcher yet it still has tremendous feel.The model I use was introduced in 1996, and I have no plans to ever change from it. It's the Wilson Pro Staff 6.1 Oversized Stretch.
I have one of these! Rocket launcher yet it still has tremendous feel.
We're organizing a "Golden 70s doubles" tourney at my club, were we provide woddies to the stronger players and old (80s or early 90s) graphite or metall rackets to the lesser ones (from my collection). Adding a few metal and sandwich rackets along maybe with a few unique sticks for good measure. The objective is to have good fun with some (g)old sticks and dress up as vintage as possible for it! I might come back with a few pics after the tourney which is end of September - hopefully we'll have good luck with the weather... then it should be fun!
...fail better!
I played a little with a TX-6000. It had a slightly bigger head than the Y-2000. It was stiffer I believe, because the steel extrusion was not like the T-2000. It had the proportions of a modern wide beam. The beam was not wide, but the beam thickness was narrow. It moved through the air well so it volleyed well and served well. I could not hit good groundstrokes with it. I did better with the flexible T-2000.You may be the only person I've ever heard of who actually played with the TX-6000 I've got one that I don't think ever found its way to the court.
Hi, I wonder if your TX-6000 is (or was) 26 inch in length..I played a little with a TX-6000. ...
Great! That's what i like! Old racquets and vintage clothing. But the shoes were modern! What was the racquet of your choice then?Over 40 players, old and young came together for our fun vintage doubles last Saturday! I’ve never seen so many smiles on tennis courts, everybody seemed to have fun and enjoy a unique tennis experience... I had brought over 50 vintage rackets along for the occasion!
...fail better!
All of my racquets are at least 30 years old, mostly wood.
Yeah, it was fun unfortunately I did not have any old-school shoes and honestly, not sure I'd want to do that to my feet anyway. I actually do not recall all the rackets I played that day, probably about 3 or for. in the first pic you see me trying to halfvolley back with a Head Arthur Ashe comp (or just below at serve):Great! That's what i like! Old racquets and vintage clothing. But the shoes were modern! What was the racquet of your choice then?
Might have been. I was not enamored of it. So, like a lot of rackets, it passed through my hands. It was definitely not marketed as a junior racket. They could have tried to sneak a 26 in racket toward adult players. I can't , however, see any logic for doing that ?Hi, I wonder if your TX-6000 is (or was) 26 inch in length..
Hi, I wonder if your TX-6000 is (or was) 26 inch in length..
Great! Like your story ver much. It will be nice to take part in this tournament. I regulary played with Max 200G, have Head Arthur Ashe, but never trie it.I even got the same polo as yours! And some remakes of vintage tennis shoes that now becoming casual not athletic stuff.Yeah, it was fun unfortunately I did not have any old-school shoes and honestly, not sure I'd want to do that to my feet anyway. I actually do not recall all the rackets I played that day, probably about 3 or for. in the first pic you see me trying to halfvolley back with a Head Arthur Ashe comp (or just below at serve):
After checking pics, I also played a Borg Allwood
which I quite liked. Very different from the Ashe of course.
The rest I do not remember. I probably did not use a 200g, as this is a racket I frequently use for doubles and it would have felt like cheating. Also I did not use my Equijet LT 301, as I use it every once in a while... and anyway, there was a lady who would not want to let it go anymore once she had started to use it . Good times!
Might have been. I was not enamored of it. So, like a lot of rackets, it passed through my hands. It was definitely not marketed as a junior racket. They could have tried to sneak a 26 in racket toward adult players. I can't , however, see any logic for doing that ?
Thanks for the response. I asked because mine is substantially shorter than normal adult racquet. (I didn't measure it though.) My initial thought was they perhaps made smaller grip shorter (mine is 1/4) just like they used to make smaller grip lighter. But it dosen’t look so.You didn't ask me, but the unit I have is 26.1", so it was most likely made that way. This model is significantly shorter than the other Lacoste-licensed Wilsons, which are all around 680 mm (26.8") in length, if you exclude the vibration dampeners.
Mine is just a hair over 26". Maybe it was because of the weight at 13.6oz(4 1/2 Medium)...they were reducing the lever arm length so folks could actually swing it!!!Thanks for the response. I asked because mine is substantially shorter than normal adult racquet. (I didn't measure it though.) My initial thought was they perhaps made smaller grip shorter (mine is 1/4) just like they used to make smaller grip lighter. But it dosen’t look so.
The balance of those wood racquets make them tough to handle.Mine is just a hair over 26". Maybe it was because of the weight at 13.6oz(4 1/2 Medium)...they were reducing the lever arm length so folks could actually swing it!!!
The retro shorts were definitely a lot more difficult to play in vs my regular shorts.those shorts though...
Lol, yes! I think the toughest part about a retro tournament are the old shorts, and old shoes.The retro shorts were definitely a lot more difficult to play in vs my regular shorts.
It was hard to fit a ball in the pocket...
Who won?Wood vs Metal doubles match tonight.
Wilson Jack Kramer Pro Staff
Wilson Advantage
vsWilson T2000
Yamaha Metal racquet
I really love old shorts (planning toget me something vintage) and old shoes. Playing with old frames most of the time.Lol, yes! I think the toughest part about a retro tournament are the old shorts, and old shoes.
Love the old frames (with new strings).
Metal won in 3 sets.Who won?
I really love old shorts (planning toget me something vintage) and old shoes. Playing with old frames most of the time.
Metal won in 3 sets.
I have a few retro shorts and shirts.
I also have a pair of Adidas Stan Smiths I bought about 15 yrs ago. Modern shoes are SO much better at locking down your feet.
One of my favorite shoes of all time was the old Wilson Prostaff mesh shoes. So comfortable and an incredible, removable insole cushion.
Lol, retro everything I suppose. Still have a pair. The air trainers were my favorite but you can blow through them in a week playing tennis.
I liked the Nike Air Oscillates that Sampras wore also. Nike was still making them up until a few years back. Very comfortable, but not the most durable.Great, same with me. Modern shoes are much more functional, but old just looking very stylish. I've heard about PS shoes, first time in 1987, Wilson also had PS clothing line. Never saw these shoes alive. Know that Sampras used them, even under different pj.
I liked the Nike Air Oscillates that Sampras wore also. Nike was still making them up until a few years back. Very comfortable, but not the most durable.
Air Oscillate with mesh cutouts would be great!
Yes! Those are the ones. I think I still have an old pair of the Prostaff mesh shoes sitting around in my parents garage somewhere.
The prostaff mesh shoes were amazingly breathable. On windy days I could actually feel the wind cooling my feet.
The closest I can find to this is the Prince T22. Prince T22's fit and Prostaff mesh breathability combined together would be the perfect shoe for me.