Binge watch monica Seles matchesIs it possible to win playing aggressive tennis if your first serve isnti hitting? If you're an aggressive player, what do you do if your serve isn't clicking for you?
I don't foresee you winning unless the other person is also having an off day serving. If you serve poorly, you will be on the defensive unless they return poorly. If they do, then perhaps you could start being aggressive and try to dictate points. If they dictate from the start, you will be in for a short day. If the other player also serves poorly, then it will boil down to what I would call a WTA type match. Last one to break serve, wins!
If my 1st serve is not clicking, I would serve only 2nd serves.
Is it possible to win playing aggressive tennis if your first serve isnti hitting?
If you're an aggressive player, what do you do if your serve isn't clicking for you?
Don't forget ROS. Get it back deep with pace and you start to apply pressure on their serve. Unfortunately, ROS requires someone who wants to practice serves.For aggressive players then, #1 focus in practice should be the serve.
Is it possible to win playing aggressive tennis if your first serve isnti hitting? If you're an aggressive player, what do you do if your serve isn't clicking for you?
For aggressive players then, #1 focus in practice should be the serve.
Is it possible to win playing aggressive tennis if your first serve isnti hitting? If you're an aggressive player, what do you do if your serve isn't clicking for you?
If you have a good kick serve, a good topspin serve and a good slice serve, you can mix these up and keep your opponent guessing.Is it possible to win playing aggressive tennis if your first serve isnti hitting? If you're an aggressive player, what do you do if your serve isn't clicking for you?
You can't. that is the quick answer.
My serve is weak and the problem with that, is it gives your opponent control of points on your serve. They take control with the return, which forces you on the defensive. If they have a good serve, you are on the defensive in their games as well.
My whole game is basically shaped by the weakness of the serve and I start most rallies in a poor position and have to neutralise my opponents attacking shots long enough to get back to at least a neutral position. This is not an easy way to play tennis.
My advice, serve better, which is what I am trying to do.
Thiem's 30+ ace serve vs Nadal's less than a handful ace serve is irrelevant in the end. No?
Thiem's 30+ ace serve vs Nadal's less than a handful ace serve is irrelevant in the end. No?
It's not irrelevant; more like, it wasn't as relevant as the rest of Nadal's game. And if Thiem had gotten 3 more aces at the right junctures, he would have won.
Disagree.
If Thiem would have had zero aces, he would have likely got broken much more in the match (fewer free points on serve). Also, Thiem's big serves set up easy putaways. Someone like Schwartzman or Džumhur doesn't get as many changes to be aggressive on the first shot following the serve.
If Thiem would have had zero aces, why would we even bring him into this topic? This topic is about a decisively worse server of the two (Nadal) but still come out on top. That's what the OP was wondering about, and a good example for him to follow.
I guess the prototype for bad serve and aggressive game would be Connors?
J
decisively worse server of the two (Nadal) but still come out on top.
Connors is good example.
I was thinking Nalbandian as well. While not a horrible serve (definitely better than Connors), it definitely wasn't a weapon and he likely would have won a GS or two if he had a slightly better serve... Imagine if Nalbandian's groundies were cleaning up after a 1st serve like Sampras or Fed