MichaelNadal
Bionic Poster
Lol oh NOW yall don't like it huh? I've been saying it's a crap decision to not play the set out.
Now the FO is the only slam where #ManlyTennis remains.
Now the FO is the only slam where #ManlyTennis remains.
I don’t care what anyone says, they stole the ‘super tie break’ format from topspin 4...
Right @Poisoned Slice
And from this moment on, the Next Gen's slams won't be as meaningful as the slams of their predecessors.
5th set? Those damn millenials don't want 5 sets. One set, no ad, match tiebreaker if you get to 6-6.Play a Super-tiebreak instead of a fifth set. And use the Coman tie-break. Give every spectator a vuvuzela pls.
Roland Garros is the only true slam now.
Mission... not accomplished. We must get rid of dis BO5 thingy altogether.
You know the story about Rothenberg, Stalin, Hitler, the elevator, me and the gun with 2 bullets?Ben Rothenberg's opinions and face combine to be the stuff of nightmares.
However, in a move that perfectly sums up the lack of uniformity across the four grand slam tournaments, Australian chiefs have decided their preference is to play a “super tie-break” at 6-6, in which the player must win ten points by a margin of two.
Rothenberg brown nosing the WTA . Dude save it.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/tenni...s/news-story/b1d68bba679fff717dccc2b37403b091
"Please, stop throwing the women under the bus because the men demand two sets of self-indulgent foreplay before their matches get anywhere."
-Ben Rothenberg
My thoughts on RottenburgerWhat's the punishment for torchering a man in whichever country Rothenberg belongs to ?
I will tie him to a chair and have him watch WTA matches. Especially in which there are 100 breaks of serve.
He won't last a day. So maybe we should also look into unintentional murder.
this moment? That's always been the case.And from this moment on, the Next Gen's slams won't be as meaningful as the slams of their predecessors.
It's the equivalent number of points, but not at all the equivalent of playing 2.5 games.Super tiebreaker makes little sense. A regular game is 4 points. 10 points is the equivalent of 2.5 games. Maybe in those 2.5 games there would have been a traditional break of serve.
Super TB only makes sense as replacement for 3rd set.
Can you explain in simple English what you mean?Think of how incredibly stupid the average human being is.
...........
..........
Now that you have contemplated that for at least .3 seconds,
Consider the fact that half the people on earth are dumber than that.
Up there with Kevin AndersonDoes this make John Isner one of the most influential players in the history of tennis? He has now forced TWO Grand Slam tournaments to modify their scoring traditions including the most tradition-oriented event of all, Wimbledon!!!
Honestly, the most scary thing about this is that it shows organisers in tennis have the unquestionable stupidity that might eventually lead to Bo3 at Slams.
Why not?It's the equivalent number of points, but not at all the equivalent of playing 2.5 games.
#metooI don't even want to entertain the possibility of that...
I hate this watering down of tennis.
The only AO Final affected by this would have been 1988 where Wilander beat Cash 8-6. However the Wawrinka-Novak classics would not have happened.
A fight to the death with no final set TB makes more sense on natural surfaces that are not as harsh on the body.
Why not just play best of 5 super tie-breaks? Short and sweet.
Why are super tiebreaks more nonsensical than regular tiebreaks?