Australian Open set to introduce a super tiebreak in the final set

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Lol oh NOW yall don't like it huh? I've been saying it's a crap decision to not play the set out.
Now the FO is the only slam where #ManlyTennis remains.
 

norcal

Legend
French Open?

Roger says,

giphy.gif
 

Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

Talk Tennis Guru
But seriously ( :-D ) I am considering quitting tennis because instead of the rare 9-7s and 10-8s I will only be able to see ... :oops: ... tiebreaks! :eek:

You know why? Because those last few games is what 5 set epics are all about, SCREW everything before them. :rolleyes:

This decision is like the sport committed suicide I am telling you! :mad:

Or maybe I just have the need to whine about everything, not sure which one is it yet... o_O

NauticalGorgeousGoldfinch-size_restricted.gif


tenor.gif

Don't worry, be happy! :)
 

Poisoned Slice

Bionic Poster
I don’t care what anyone says, they stole the ‘super tie break’ format from topspin 4...
Right @Poisoned Slice

Absolutely.

Imagine the uproar if the end of set 4 we went immediately to super tie break like top spin 4. I admit,I did get upset at times because we went into final set and it went straight to tiebreak. Especially if I was struggling on normal tiebreaks on that day. At least the players will all know what is going on.

Yeah, my fault for not reading the match rules before any match lost on super tiebreak. :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: K-H

mike danny

Bionic Poster
And from this moment on, the Next Gen's slams won't be as meaningful as the slams of their predecessors.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
But seriously, why? I understand Wimb making this decision since grass is grass and it favors servers more, but HC? Why?
 

Midaso240

Legend
I don't have the stats in front of me,but I don't recall that many men's b05 matches in Melbourne going past 6-6 in the 5th set anyway. Maybe not as often as the other slams? Still surprised at the news though...
 
Last edited:
C

Chadalina

Guest
Roland Garros is the only true slam now.

I'll give the french credit, nothing has changed in a 100 years.

When a lack of evolution is a good thing, the people in charge are doing a bad job. With guys like gimelstob on the council, it makes sense.
 

justasport

Professional
The rules need to be the same at all four majors and that is you play a classic tiebreaker at 12-12. Playing classic tiebreaker is perfect for the first 4 sets, but the 5th set must be special without going overboard and the 12-12 for a classic tiebreaker is perfect!
 

duaneeo

Legend
However, in a move that perfectly sums up the lack of uniformity across the four grand slam tournaments, Australian chiefs have decided their preference is to play a “super tie-break” at 6-6, in which the player must win ten points by a margin of two.

Great!
 

Raining hopes

Hall of Fame
Rothenberg brown nosing the WTA :rolleyes:. Dude save it.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/tenni...s/news-story/b1d68bba679fff717dccc2b37403b091

"Please, stop throwing the women under the bus because the men demand two sets of self-indulgent foreplay before their matches get anywhere."

-Ben Rothenberg

What's the punishment for torchering a man in whichever country Rothenberg belongs to ?
I will tie him to a chair and have him watch WTA matches. Especially in which there are 100 breaks of serve.

He won't last a day. So maybe we should also look into unintentional murder.
 

metsman

G.O.A.T.
Tio Toni Soprano paying off all the other majors so RG stands alone as the only real major. Ralph 11 majors, Fed/Djok-1.
 

Jackuar

Hall of Fame
So, finally RG remains the last man standing, just like its surface, its gonna grind the players, fans and everyone alike. And will remain a proper slam.

Damn!

Why doesn't any of the guys inside the glassroom read online forums? At least they should hire someone to read it for them.
 

Beacon Hill

Hall of Fame
Super tiebreaker makes little sense. A regular game is 4 points. 10 points is the equivalent of 2.5 games. Maybe in those 2.5 games there would have been a traditional break of serve.

Super TB only makes sense as replacement for 3rd set.
It's the equivalent number of points, but not at all the equivalent of playing 2.5 games.
 

Red Rick

Bionic Poster
Honestly, the most scary thing about this is that it shows organisers in tennis have the unquestionable stupidity that might eventually lead to Bo3 at Slams.
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
Does this make John Isner one of the most influential players in the history of tennis? He has now forced TWO Grand Slam tournaments to modify their scoring traditions including the most tradition-oriented event of all, Wimbledon!!! :oops:

Not even The Great Roger has had the power to make TWO of the BIGGEST tournaments in tennis change like this to suit HIS game!!! :oops::oops:

6a00e54ee7a84388330120a7ff3b17970b-450wi
 
Last edited:
Does this make John Isner one of the most influential players in the history of tennis? He has now forced TWO Grand Slam tournaments to modify their scoring traditions including the most tradition-oriented event of all, Wimbledon!!! :oops:

6a00e54ee7a84388330120a7ff3b17970b-450wi
Up there with Kevin Anderson
 

Enceladus

Legend
I took this information at first as a bad joke.
When it is introduced the Super TB is 6:6 in the fifth set at the AO, already we will not see any fascinating fifth set of similar caliber, such as 12-10 in the Djoker-Stan match at AO 2013 or a year after 7-9. The end of the tight match that ends in the STB will no longer have the charm of the Djoker-Stan matches and other matches, that exceeded the 6:6 score.
What makes me angry the most in this situation, is the effort of AO promoters to distinguish themselves from Wimbledon. I wrote dissenting opinions, when the Wimbledon organizers introduced TB at 12:12 score in response to the Anderson-Isner match. But it can be said that TB at score 12:12 is an acceptable compromise, where they will continue to be atained 8:6, 9:7, 10:8, 11:9, 12:10 and 13:11 scores. But I don't understand the AO organizers' thoughts, why they are of the opinion that STB at 6:6 score is better than the classic TB at 12:12 score. It's good for a tournament schedule, but bad for tennis.
 
Last edited:

Red Rick

Bionic Poster
I don't even want to entertain the possibility of that...

I hate this watering down of tennis.
#metoo

Honestly if Slams go to Bo3 I imagine the chance is ripe for people with too much money to start Bo5 tournaments from scratch, throw a huge prize pool on it, and get some top players going
 

big ted

Legend
super or not i think any tiebreaker is better than no tiebreaker at all, but a regular tiebreak is better..
if youre going to play to 10 points and win by 2, you may as well play another 3-4 games...
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
The only AO Final affected by this would have been 1988 where Wilander beat Cash 8-6. However the Wawrinka-Novak classics would not have happened.

I think 12-12 like Wimbledon is perfect. An entire 6th set is played. Fair.
 
D

Deleted member 3771

Guest
I like long classic matches but a 5th set super tie break may not be a bad compromise for hard court slams but I'd prefer no final set TB in all of the slam finals. If the AO goes with a 5th set super tie breaker, then maybe the USO should do the same and upgrade their final set TB to a super tiebreak. A fight to the death with no final set TB makes more sense on natural surfaces that are not as harsh on the body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Robert F

Hall of Fame
I guess it helps eliminate serv bot marathon matches, but at the same time by going to the TB doesn't that give the better server the edge?
 

merlinpinpin

Hall of Fame
Why not just play best of 5 super tie-breaks? Short and sweet.

That would still be too long. Super tiebreaks for the first two sets, regular tiebreaks for the next two, and a 1-point TB as the fifth set? That would be nothing short of revolutionary. :eek:
 

borna coric

Semi-Pro
I think fifth set tie break, whether 7 or 10 points systems, is great idea when you consider how hot and humid it is down under in January. As the earth is getting hotter and hotter due to human burning coal and petroleum products (aka global warming), this is definitely the right move. The health of players needs to be the most important thing.
 
Top