Cindysphinx
G.O.A.T.
Quick background: I was a 3.5 until 2011; became a 4.0 in 2012; was bumped back down to 3.5 in 2017.
I am confident that my 2017 self would *destroy* my 2011 self if the two Cindys had a chance to play.
The 2011 version was one-dimensional and moonballed everyone and everything, which worked perfectly against 3.5s. The 2017 version doesn't moonball but instead comes to net.
The 2011 version had only flat or loopy topspin balls; the 2017 version has added FH and BH slice.
The 2011 version hit everything hard and missed a lot; the 2017 version has some touch, focuses on placement, tries to make smart choices.
Otherwise, the two Cindys have the same basic serve, fitness, etc., although it is impossible to deny that 2017 Cindy is older.
So why is it that 2011 Cindy (88% wins) has a better record than 2017 Cindy (71% wins)? The difference between 88% and 71% might not sound like much, but remember that one-third of the 2011 wins were in the post-season (92% wins at districts/sectionals/nationals) where the competition is presumably tougher.
If 2017 Cindy is a better and smarter all-around doubles players, how come she doesn't win more?
Is anyone else here able to compare their records and playing styles before and after bump?
I am confident that my 2017 self would *destroy* my 2011 self if the two Cindys had a chance to play.
The 2011 version was one-dimensional and moonballed everyone and everything, which worked perfectly against 3.5s. The 2017 version doesn't moonball but instead comes to net.
The 2011 version had only flat or loopy topspin balls; the 2017 version has added FH and BH slice.
The 2011 version hit everything hard and missed a lot; the 2017 version has some touch, focuses on placement, tries to make smart choices.
Otherwise, the two Cindys have the same basic serve, fitness, etc., although it is impossible to deny that 2017 Cindy is older.
So why is it that 2011 Cindy (88% wins) has a better record than 2017 Cindy (71% wins)? The difference between 88% and 71% might not sound like much, but remember that one-third of the 2011 wins were in the post-season (92% wins at districts/sectionals/nationals) where the competition is presumably tougher.
If 2017 Cindy is a better and smarter all-around doubles players, how come she doesn't win more?
Is anyone else here able to compare their records and playing styles before and after bump?