The article you cited literally said right after the quotes about 10x the player blah blah that Pete clarified what he meant as going bigger on the 2nd and approaching behind it more...LOL!More generalisations. You Fed haters have become what you hate
"10x the player."
"Players overall weren't as good."
But yeah Pete just meant he just hit a harder second serve and approached more
Being able to hit your serve harder is definitely technical btw.
No, the wind was also part of the anti-Fed conspiracy the whole world is engaged in apparently.
Come on man. The wind only blew for Federer
It may be called for shortly.ROFLMAOboy definitely needs a bigger head(size). I don't pull out my Radicals for slackers.
:
I actually never said the 2000-2003 era was weak. That's something that's said here on TT, but I've been pretty consistent: 2004-2007 was the Great Weak Era.
Djokovic has been skrewed by poor scheduling enough.
Okay, so peakiest of peak Feds had to go 5 with grandPassi under "equalized" conditions...how has this changed anything?
Also, you realize the ONLY reason I brought up this whole match with Agassi was because your fanbase was using the Wimbledon final as proof that Djokovic wasn't a worthy #1, right?
After seeing what a 32 year old Djokovic can do how have you not changed your opinion
On the surface, sure. More slams, more weeks #1 etc. (though not more YE#1 which is big, and PETE'S were consecutive, also big)
Is he bringing anything new to the table?
That Fed's backhand would make Lopez blush.
You are pursuing your case aggressively.
Lol, the irony.
Not really actually. I'm happy with what Pete did. Again, I've been pretty consistent on my reasons for posting: to counter the Fedfanatic fanbase's hype machine which would put out the narrative that the current top players are the best in the history of the sport (each GOAT coming after the other, within a span of 10 years, no less lol).
But why on earth have you taken up this battle on July 27, 2019?
2019 Djokovic is pretty much a mentally tougher 2012-2014 Djokovic. Back then he was a mental midget. My point is Djokovic is playing as well as he did in his prime. Not as well as 2011 or 2015 but those kinds of years don't happen very often.
Which are our daftest?
Why didn't you take up the point I raised about Peakerer needing 5 sets to handle Grandpassi on your thread about Djokovic needing 5 sets to handle Federer? lmao
I see a lot more respect from Nadalovic fans towards Petros than Fedfans. Simple as that. Fedfans around here still take huge self-validating dukes on Pete like he did something to them personally.
How many questions have you dodged since I entered the fray here?
His performance at the AO is certainly worthy
This has been considered the reasonable stance until individuals such as yourself moved the goalposts (out of fear of Feddie's records being struck down by Djokovic within a year or two)
Aren't you dodging a question right here?
