Anything past prime is always weak? Not the way I roll. Weaker, for sure, not greatly in its best matches but enough to tell if your opponent is himself a great player in his peak/prime. What's silly is asserting that those wins somehow prove that Djokovic peaked higher in all respective tournaments, as some would have it.
2011 was a strong season, 2015 not so much but I'm paying attention to level first as that's what the player can control, and 2015 Djokovic obviously passes the test. It's the recent wins that carry the all-too-lovely weak era label with the wobbliness of their tennis.
I’m not arguing over who has the higher peak level between Djokovic and Federer. That’s up for debate and I have no issue with either point of view (I do have an issue with people who suggest it’s not close one way or another). I also don’t disagree that the current field is not particularly strong, and that Djokovic has benefitted somewhat (as Federer has himself at various times).
My issue was with a poster who claimed that Djokovic was only able to break through in the first place because Federer had declined, as if the guy has always been an opportunist, when Federer wasn’t even the benchmark or the dominant force at the time of the breakthrough.
Djokovic was still a teenager at the time of peak Federer. To expect a teenage Djokovic to dislodge an undeclined peak Federer, and to hold it against him for failing to do so as seemed to be suggested, is ridiculous.
Nadal was the dominant player and the benchmark coming into 2011. He came into 2011 off the back of his best season ever and Djokovic well and truly displaced him in a manner that I don’t think any version of Federer would have been capable of doing (not necessarily because Djokovic’s peak is higher than Federer’s, of course a lot of it comes down to the specific match-up against Nadal). For that reason, I find it laughable that there are fanatics of Federer himself that claim that Djokovic’s 2011 is a result of opportunism.
Maybe I shouldn’t bother responding to such claims as they are so obviously false, but I can’t help myself sometimes.