And give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?let’s come back to reality. Fed isn’t making the final. If he did and faced Djoker it would be brutal.
I don’t think us Djokovic fans care about that. All we hope to see is Djokovic win his 6th Wimbledon and most importantly record equaling 20th slam. I don’t care who he wins it against to be honest.And give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?
Why wouldn't a 40 year old facing a dominant #1 player be eviscerated in a BO5 final? Check out the 1974 Wimbledon final when a dominant #1 played a 40 year old. Rosewall won a couple of games, it was expected.
You're right, a Djokvoic-Fed Wimbledon final it would be brutal and somehow, in your fandom's world, that equates with Roger Federer being a weak POS loser. And your fan base can't see that if Novak was playing a Wimbledon final in 2030 wouldn't be effortlessly blown out by some random 18 year old?
How about celebrating on your knees a guy with two knee surgeries, 4 kids and not having played for 2 years has made the 4R of a slam? And if he makes the final it would be jaw dropping. But it's all about living vicariously through a stranger and that elevates their own barren lives. Address that... nobody in your group does so and never will.
Medvedev is screwed over bro. He will probably need to play 2 consecutive days.Potentially. Although I wouldn’t like to call that match if it happens.
But at the same time, it's such a shame that Novak failed to take a set from Murray on grass, isn't it ? 2-0 bud, deal with it
I doubt it rains tomorrow. The forecast isn’t that bad as I checked. Plus at least they starting court 2 matches from 11am so Meddy shouldn’t have to wait too long to start. I feel he will be fine and win this match. I feel he has a shot against Fed in quarters if it happens as well. I make Fed the slight favourite but if Meddy won it wouldn’t surprise me at all.Medvedev is screwed over bro. He will probably need to play 2 consecutive days.
He is last on court #2 without roof. Won't finish in time most likely. Possible rain and bad light as well.
If Federer makes the final, he's obviously playing at a high level. Do you think people look at Tom Brady and LeBron James as pushovers just because they're in their mid-40s and late-30s, respectively? Do you think the UFC fighters facing Stipe Miocic for the belt were looking at him as some incapable old man just because he's almost 40? Is Ronaldo not a threat anymore because he's 36? Stop using the guy's age as some kind of excuse. Athletes across sports are having much longer careers today, and a 39-year-old Federer is no exception. If he makes the final, he deserves to be there, and he would deserve everything coming his way.And give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?
Why wouldn't a 40 year old facing a dominant #1 player be eviscerated in a BO5 final? Check out the 1974 Wimbledon final when a dominant #1 played a 40 year old. Rosewall won a couple of games, it was expected.
You're right, a Djokvoic-Fed Wimbledon final it would be brutal and somehow, in your fandom's world, that equates with Roger Federer being a weak POS loser. And your fan base can't see that if Novak was playing a Wimbledon final in 2030 wouldn't be effortlessly blown out by some random 18 year old?
How about celebrating on your knees a guy with two knee surgeries, 4 kids and not having played for 2 years has made the 4R of a slam? And if he makes the final it would be jaw dropping. But it's all about living vicariously through a stranger and that elevates their own barren lives. Address that... nobody in your group does so and never will.
if main court matches finish fast his match will be moved thereMedvedev is screwed over bro. He will probably need to play 2 consecutive days.
He is last on court #2 without roof. Won't finish in time most likely. Possible rain and bad light as well.
That is NOT true. They don't do that.if main court matches finish fast his match will be moved there
I dunno, none of the top ND fan posters are saying anything like that. There’s always the idiots sureAnd give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?
Why wouldn't a 40 year old facing a dominant #1 player be eviscerated in a BO5 final? Check out the 1974 Wimbledon final when a dominant #1 played a 40 year old. Rosewall won a couple of games, it was expected.
You're right, a Djokvoic-Fed Wimbledon final it would be brutal and somehow, in your fandom's world, that equates with Roger Federer being a weak POS loser. And your fan base can't see that if Novak was playing a Wimbledon final in 2030 wouldn't be effortlessly blown out by some random 18 year old?
How about celebrating on your knees a guy with two knee surgeries, 4 kids and not having played for 2 years has made the 4R of a slam? And if he makes the final it would be jaw dropping. But it's all about living vicariously through a stranger and that elevates their own barren lives. Address that... nobody in your group does so and never will.
If it happens (not sure if Fed can get there), Djokovic should win, but I will be surprised if it is brutal like RG 2008. This is grass and Djokovic is slightly overrated here. There's no question that he's the best player in the world right now, but he's been a lot stronger than he is now. A peak Djokovic would certainly brutalize this Federer, but this one is like 70-80% of peak Djokovic.And give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?
Why wouldn't a 40 year old facing a dominant #1 player be eviscerated in a BO5 final? Check out the 1974 Wimbledon final when a dominant #1 played a 40 year old. Rosewall won a couple of games, it was expected.
You're right, a Djokvoic-Fed Wimbledon final it would be brutal and somehow, in your fandom's world, that equates with Roger Federer being a weak POS loser. And your fan base can't see that if Novak was playing a Wimbledon final in 2030 wouldn't be effortlessly blown out by some random 18 year old?
How about celebrating on your knees a guy with two knee surgeries, 4 kids and not having played for 2 years has made the 4R of a slam? And if he makes the final it would be jaw dropping. But it's all about living vicariously through a stranger and that elevates their own barren lives. Address that... nobody in your group does so and never will.
You’re talking about just a few crazies in that fanbase. Most of them are pretty respectful and reasonable, something you keep overlooking time and time again.And give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?
Why wouldn't a 40 year old facing a dominant #1 player be eviscerated in a BO5 final? Check out the 1974 Wimbledon final when a dominant #1 played a 40 year old. Rosewall won a couple of games, it was expected.
You're right, a Djokvoic-Fed Wimbledon final it would be brutal and somehow, in your fandom's world, that equates with Roger Federer being a weak POS loser. And your fan base can't see that if Novak was playing a Wimbledon final in 2030 wouldn't be effortlessly blown out by some random 18 year old?
How about celebrating on your knees a guy with two knee surgeries, 4 kids and not having played for 2 years has made the 4R of a slam? And if he makes the final it would be jaw dropping. But it's all about living vicariously through a stranger and that elevates their own barren lives. Address that... nobody in your group does so and never will.
The sheer amount of generalization here is mind boggling. Fandom is not a monolith. There are loonies in all fanbases. Using the extremes to make sweeping generalizations about all fans is absurdly reductive.And give credit to the Fed fan base who have all (without exception) stated the same. The Djokovic cultists post here 500 times a day (in an era none in that cult except Hitman ever witnessed), "Baghdatis! Flipper! Weak era crap!" yet they celebrate and cream in their pants over beating a 40 year old who hasn't played in 2 years?
Why wouldn't a 40 year old facing a dominant #1 player be eviscerated in a BO5 final? Check out the 1974 Wimbledon final when a dominant #1 played a 40 year old. Rosewall won a couple of games, it was expected.
You're right, a Djokvoic-Fed Wimbledon final it would be brutal and somehow, in your fandom's world, that equates with Roger Federer being a weak POS loser. And your fan base can't see that if Novak was playing a Wimbledon final in 2030 wouldn't be effortlessly blown out by some random 18 year old?
How about celebrating on your knees a guy with two knee surgeries, 4 kids and not having played for 2 years has made the 4R of a slam? And if he makes the final it would be jaw dropping. But it's all about living vicariously through a stranger and that elevates their own barren lives. Address that... nobody in your group does so and never will.
I’d put Djoker at around 90% peak. His ground strokes and movement clearly aren’t peak level but his serve and his volleys are. His return has been great at times, other times not so much. Drop shot is close to peak.If it happens (not sure if Fed can get there), Djokovic should win, but I will be surprised if it is brutal like RG 2008. This is grass and Djokovic is slightly overrated here. There's no question that he's the best player in the world right now, but he's been a lot stronger than he is now. A peak Djokovic would certainly brutalize this Federer, but this one is like 70-80% of peak Djokovic.
Was he even close to healthy for W20?If this Final happens, Fed will play like the devil himself. He 'should have' won last time. He 'should have' got revenge the next year but for COVID. All that seething rage...he will leave it all out there even if it ends his season.
Was he even close to healthy for W20?
Fed used the cancellation of Wimbledon and Tour hiatus to correct minor niggles in his kneesI have lots of doubts about the severity of the injury, let's just say that. I think it was more about the pandemic and restrictions. Not traveling with his team etc. he basically said so.
He was chased by two other phenomenal players, but at least he was at the top of the mountain and that's itEmerson held it for 30+ yrs. Fed is the only one going into retirement without the slam record - that’s gotta hurt. Explains why he’s still out there, clinging to hope.
Federer is not rosewell with only a slice BH....beating big servers like Med,Zverev/Berettini means he must bring his best and his FH must be on fire. If he makes that far he will put up a fight and may dominate like he did in 2019.Honestly, if Fed does somehow make it, which would no doubt be after tough 5-setters against the likes of Medevdev, then Zverev/Berrettini, he'll suffer a similar fate to the last 39-year old man who reached the Wimbledon final. People rightly talk about Rosewall reaching the climax at SW19 in 1974 aged 39, but lest we forget, he was annihilated 1-6, 1-6, 4-6 by a rampaging Connors.
Maybe, it's impossible to measure this of course. I think his mind is actually tougher now than ever.I’d put Djoker at around 90% peak. His ground strokes and movement clearly aren’t peak level but his serve and his volleys are. His return has been great at times, other times not so much. Drop shot is close to peak.
Great pointMaybe, it's impossible to measure this of course. I think his mind is actually tougher now than ever.
Rosewall defeated No.1 Newcombe, and then Smith, both of whom were big servers.Federer is not rosewell with only a slice BH....beating big servers like Med,Zverev/Berettini means he must bring his best and his FH must be on fire. If he makes that far he will put up a fight and may dominate like he did in 2019.
How big were they serving ?? 140 mphRosewall defeated No.1 Newcombe, and then Smith, both of whom were big servers.
No chance Federer withdraws from a Wimbledon final. The only way he stops having nightmares over 40-15 is a win over Djokovic there.Wonder if Fed really relishes the prospect of making the final only to face Djokovic yet again?
Against anybody else, I think he would go in with some confidence but after the horror finale of 2019 and the likelihood of going down a FOURTH time to his principal Wimbledon rival might just make him do an RG and pull out at that point. He would claim he was saving himself for Tokyo given it's almost certainly his last chance to win an OSG.
Anybody else think that likely?
Can't speak for everybody but... Obviously no, lol.Wonder if Fed really relishes the prospect of making the final only to face Djokovic yet again?
Against anybody else, I think he would go in with some confidence but after the horror finale of 2019 and the likelihood of going down a FOURTH time to his principal Wimbledon rival might just make him do an RG and pull out at that point. He would claim he was saving himself for Tokyo given it's almost certainly his last chance to win an OSG.
Anybody else think that likely?
Nope. He will go out guns blazing. Pre-2019 WB Finals threads were all about Djokovic blitzing/murdering/wrecking Fed in 3 FAST Sets. No one gave Fed a chance, except hardcore loyalists. All facts showed Djoker killing him out there. Netcord saved Joe Covid.Wonder if Fed really relishes the prospect of making the final only to face Djokovic yet again?
Against anybody else, I think he would go in with some confidence but after the horror finale of 2019 and the likelihood of going down a FOURTH time to his principal Wimbledon rival might just make him do an RG and pull out at that point. He would claim he was saving himself for Tokyo given it's almost certainly his last chance to win an OSG.
Anybody else think that likely?
No chance Federer withdraws from a Wimbledon final. The only way he stops having nightmares over 40-15 is a win over Djokovic there.
I think he really does. He's looking forward to this match. He knows that he's likely to lose but he wants to try, and it's impossible to know that there will be another chance is he misses this one.Wonder if Fed really relishes the prospect of making the final only to face Djokovic yet again?
Against anybody else, I think he would go in with some confidence but after the horror finale of 2019 and the likelihood of going down a FOURTH time to his principal Wimbledon rival might just make him do an RG and pull out at that point. He would claim he was saving himself for Tokyo given it's almost certainly his last chance to win an OSG.
Anybody else think that likely?
Yeah this. He’s already been completely owned by Djokovic, including 3-0 in Wimbledon finals and 6-0 at HC slams since 2010. Another loss doesn’t change that fact but a win helps erase the nightmare of 40-15.I think he really does. He's looking forward to this match. He knows that he's likely to lose but he wants to try, and it's impossible to know that there will be another chance is he misses this one.
He's got nothing to lose. Honestly if a 40 year old guy with kids is afraid of being bullied for trying like "oh no he kicked my butt" he should grow up. That means nothing in a mature person's life, especially considering how successful Federer has been. Accept the loss and move on, head high.
I don't envisage him actually pulling out of the final itself but maybe the semi-final if he can see that he would inevitably have to face Djokovic in the final. That way it wouldn't look too obvious. There are suggestions he did something similar at RG where he knew if he won his 4th round match he would have to face Djokovic in the next round so he withdrew.
Would he really fancy his chances against Djokovic in another Wimbledon final?
Umm okHuge alright. Huge confirmation of the colossally weak era at majors.
Yeah this. He’s already been completely owned by Djokovic, including 3-0 in Wimbledon finals and 6-0 at HC slams since 2010. Another loss doesn’t change that fact but a win helps erase the nightmare of 40-15.
4-0 in Wimbledon finals is coming up.Destiny cannot be changed, some people are born perfectly in perfect circumstances to do things in life, that cannot be changed.
Djokovic will end up as the ultimate winner in Tennis - It is inevitable !
That's the endgame, Federer and Nadal will end up behind him and history books will say both of them were inferior.
Had Sampras continued from 2003 till 2010, Federer would still have crossed 15 and Pete would have won nothing, sameway Federer by continuing from 2013 till 2021 has also not been able to change anything. These wimbledon defeats are actually a reminder from destiny that what has to happen will happen.
Novak is the person who will have all the records 20 years later when kids born now in 2021 start to play Tennis by 2040-2041, then Novak will be seen as the record holder and the benchmark ...
Sad ....
"confirmation of the colossally weak era at majors"Umm ok
When one uses these phrases @Dedans Penthouse will explain.
I hate to bring these things up but these constant brain damaging poasts sometimes need perspectives.
You do know Hewitt and Roddick were like 0-16 against Federer in majors.
And i have never agreed that was a "huge collossally weak era".
Carry on.