TW Staff
Administrator
Access from our homepage or go directly via:
http://www.tenniswarehouse.com/reviews/RQIS1T/RQIS1TReview.html
Chris, TW.
http://www.tenniswarehouse.com/reviews/RQIS1T/RQIS1TReview.html
Chris, TW.
Umm, I think you guys put the wrong tech specs at the bottom.
To help us answer these questions and more, we filled up our water bottles, lathered on some sunscreen and set out on a 3-week playtest in our own vast and expansive outback - the tennis courts of San Luis Obispo, CA. So, in the words of the man himself, "Come On!" and read on.
Access from our homepage or go directly via:
http://www.tenniswarehouse.com/reviews/RQIS1T/RQIS1TReview.html
Chris, TW.
I agree. Coming from babolat you are not a good tester of the power level.
Some friends of mine using it totally disagree with this review!
Yes, that's a fair comment. Thanks TW for writing this honnest review. But next time, please choose some guys that are really used to control sticks.really liked the 'likes' and 'dislikes', gj tw.
Thank You Chris and good job TW but i'm not totally agree with the testers and with what "likes and dislikes" reported
I have one of it and is impossible saying that have no power!!!
It's a powerful frame and has more power than 001 or 002.
I read that 2 testers usually plays with Pure Drive Roddick and is normal they said NO POWER about RQIS...
...then...i read that 2 tester plays with a FULL WESTERN GRIP and i normal too that they have heavy spin!!!
So...what kind of review is?
In my opinion you have to test this stick with 5 players that usually play with other Yonex and not with Babolat, then, they should be use the same grip to have a true review...
Just my 2 cents...
I agree. Coming from babolat you are not a good tester of the power level.
Some friends of mine using it totally disagree with this review!
No i do think that the review is very usefull actually. You have to read it in context, each of the reviewers will compare the racquet he tests to their main stick, i think thats normal. If you look at the scores at the end though i think you will find pretty objective scoring.
OMG!
How you can trust in a tester that usually plays with a Pure Drive Roddick using a Full Western grip saying that RQIS has no power and too much spin?
PDR is the most powerful stick and the full western grip give you the possibilities to hit the ball with HEAVY spin...
I play with new RQIS and i can say that is very POWERFUL and i haven't problem when i'm serving!
when they mentioned RQIS 1 is low powered, anyone knows that how low power it is? compare to dnx-10mid?
OMG!
How you can trust in a tester that usually plays with a Pure Drive Roddick using a Full Western grip saying that RQIS has no power and too much spin?
PDR is the most powerful stick and the full western grip give you the possibilities to hit the ball with HEAVY spin...
!
Waste of time.
Good luck.
After this review i think nobody will buy a RQIS!
Clap! Clap!
Waste of time.
Good luck.
After this review i think nobody will buy a RQIS!
Clap! Clap!
I've just watched the video review. Do you guys think that the NTRP level of the playtester is right? No offense to them, but I thought that 4.5 or 5.0 was much better...
Waste of time.
Good luck.
After this review i think nobody will buy a RQIS!
Clap! Clap!
Totally AGREED!
I'm a 4.5 and i play tennis better than these 5 guys!
Good job anyway...
pretty nice ... wow it seems really low powered
I've just watched the video review. Do you guys think that the NTRP level of the playtester is right? No offense to them, but I thought that 4.5 or 5.0 was much better...
I have often wondered about that. Meaning the reason for having thick beam and low flex. Can it somehow add stability without making the racquet stiff?This is really surprizing given the beam profile, and begs the question why Yonex felt it necessary to make the beam that large.
Am I wrong in assuming that wider beams are meant to provide more power, or is there another purpose for them?
I may be wrong, but I think they could have gone with a thinner beam and ended up with the same power level...
I'm one of the playtesters using the PDR that said this racquet was low powered. My previous two sticks were both from Yonex; RDX 500 Mid and MP Tour-1 Mid. The RQiS Tour 1 reminded me of the RDX a bit as it was soft feeling and low powered. I believe I mentioned that in the review.
We tested this racquet with NXT 17, various polys, some experimental multis and Yonex 850. I preferred it strung just below mid with the Yonex 850 string.
It's a nice racquet if you really like to take a big cut at the ball. Not everyone wants power, and this is one to look at if you don't.
Chris, TW.
I'm one of the playtesters using the PDR that said this racquet was low powered. My previous two sticks were both from Yonex; RDX 500 Mid and MP Tour-1 Mid. The RQiS Tour 1 reminded me of the RDX a bit as it was soft feeling and low powered. I believe I mentioned that in the review.
We tested this racquet with NXT 17, various polys, some experimental multis and Yonex 850. I preferred it strung just below mid with the Yonex 850 string.
It's a nice racquet if you really like to take a big cut at the ball. Not everyone wants power, and this is one to look at if you don't.
Chris, TW.