albino smurf
Professional
That didn't take long. Monday, September 1, 2008 is going to go down as a doozy for the RNC. Fizzling convention, hurricane and now Juno goes to Washington. What a great holiday.
And castigating people for being "judgmental" never stopped many democrats from being misogynistic and sexist when it comes to Sarah Palin and her family either.
It's ironic that those that criticize others for hypocritically taking the higher moral ground have abandoned their own moral authority by judgmentally calling Palin a bad parent and unfit mother, purely for their own selfish gain.
I'm sure she opposes marriage, gay marriage that is, so everything will be A-OK.LOL at McCain. Palin wasn't such a good choice now after all, especially because your party claims to always have the moral high ground! I can't wait until the debates, if any religious or social issues come up, Biden will have an absolute field day.
Um, no. She and people like her make careers out of condemning marriages/family for/of gay people. They make careers out of claiming the moral high ground. But, when their daughters have premarital sex and out of wedlock pregnancy, suddenly it's a "blessing" and a "private matter".This is one teenage pregnancy and until the Palin family says more about it, it needs to be left alone.
So what? Get over it and move on.
Um, no. She and people like her make careers out of condemning marriages/family for/of gay people. They make careers out of claiming the moral high ground. But, when their daughters have premarital sex and out of wedlock pregnancy, suddenly it's a "blessing" and a "private matter".
That would never happen. Instead, what's happening is the incident is being referred to as a blessing (changing the topic from premarital fornication to the infant), the announcement was made that the daughter is keeping the baby (an anti-abortion reference), the announcement was made that the girl is getting married ("pro marriage"), and requests are being made for privacy (no debate).Watch the daughter get an abortion, I'd almost **** myself with laughter if that happened and the Republicans still tried to appeal to the Conservative Christians.
Talk about putting the ol' blinders on. This is ridiculous.
Dude, stop arguing about the argument and just start looking at the facts. This isn't about Democrat vs. Republican. This is about the social direction (or misdirection) that the VP candidate has apparently given to her own daughter. If she can't do better than that with her own family, what makes you think that the American people would want her handling serious global political issues for the entire country?
You know damn well that if she were the Democratic VP candidate, you'd be all over this issue like white on rice. And you would NEVER hear the end of it from Rush Limbloat, "female impersonator" Ann Coulter, and the other Republikkkan righties.
Perhaps this was a perfectly educated couple whose method failed despite taking all necessary precautions, it happens.
Seems to happen a lot in that family.
What specifically do you mean by this comment?
Dude! This is about the level of sophisticated thinking I expected to encounter when going into the morally confused underbelly of liberal thinking. But it's still depressing to see so much dull thinking out there.Talk about putting the ol' blinders on. This is ridiculous.
Dude, stop arguing about the argument and just start looking at the facts. This isn't about Democrat vs. Republican. This is about the social direction (or misdirection) that the VP candidate has apparently given to her own daughter. If she can't do better than that with her own family, what makes you think that the American people would want her handling serious global political issues for the entire country?
So much for your even handedness.You know damn well that if she were the Democratic VP candidate, you'd be all over this issue like white on rice. And you would NEVER hear the end of it from Rush Limbloat, "female impersonator" Ann Coulter, and the other Republikkkan righties.
I'm suggesting her parents had the same problem when they got pregnant with their latest baby.
You asked for sophisticated thought and yet post such simpleminded things.Is every parent in America responsible for the bad choices their children make or is it just the ones you don't like?
I see. Well, I can't say. I know very devout Christian families with 8 or more children, they don't use any form of birth control at all and just let nature take it's course. The Palins could be one of those families, we just don't know.
Which, given the serious problem of global overpopulation (and the fact that Americans per capita consume and waste more resources) is an amoral position. People shouldn't be having 8 children. They should start adopting after one or two.I know very devout Christian families with 8 or more children, they don't use any form of birth control at all and just let nature take it's course.
What?? Ad hominem? From you?You asked for sophisticated thought and yet post such simpleminded things.
Let me point out that trying to be better morally doesn't guarantee perfection. It's something you strive for but never attain. That's one thing you should keep in mind.It's about the danger of claiming the moral high ground in American politics. You, know, the Emperor's New Clothes and all that?
We can have a discussion about gay marriage, again, and how it isn't discrimination since marriage is inerently a male/female deal. Would you like that?Instead of promoting discrimination against gay families, under the guise of Christian conservatism (who simultaneously condemns the "blessing" of premarital fornication)
I don't see how the Palins have anything to answer for. There are a lot of judgmental hypocrites out there.people like Palin should take a look in the mirror. This is like the deal with the Cheneys all over again.
Oh, so sophisticated.You should also bear in mind, while you are doing your little Snoopy dance of glee
Especially when trying to be "better".Let me point out that trying to be better morally doesn't guarantee perfection. It's something you strive for but never attain.
Actually, that would be a discussion about faulty logic.We can have a discussion about gay marriage, again, and how it isn't discrimination since marriage is inerently a male/female deal.
Which, given the serious problem of global overpopulation (and the fact that Americans per capita consume and waste more resources) is an amoral position. People shouldn't be having 8 children. They should start adopting after one or two.
This is just another example of how backward beliefs can carry their own price tag of hypocritical amorality—why people need to start looking at the big picture instead of just looking at fragments of the past.
So much for your even handedness.
Hey, those righties do it. So any asinine stupid comment I make is justified,right?
I'm not interested in convincing anyone they're "bad". I'm interested in people learning about morality so they stop preying on gay people and their families/friends/society and stop overpopulating the planet. I'm interested in people learning so things like only less than 1% of the global HIV prevention budget targets gay/bi men don't happen. I'm interested in people learning so they don't ban gay men from donating sperm due to the unscientific prejudicial notion that somehow allowing them to be fathers would increase the number of gay people.Good luck trying to convince America that Mr and Mrs Palin are bad people becuase they are a married couple that doesn't use birth control. That rule only applies to low income couples.
And accurate too, I might add.Oh, so sophisticated.
Who doesn't want to be better?Especially when trying to be "better".
If you mean on my part you've yet to come anywhere near to making that case.Actually, that would be a discussion about faulty logic.
Which, given the serious problem of global overpopulation (and the fact that Americans per capita consume and waste more resources) is an amoral position. People shouldn't be having 8 children.
Out of wedlock pregnancy, eh? Sounds familiar.Tell that to all the AA women having all those kids out of wedlock.
Whaat, whaat?? You're breaking up. .... snoopy..... .... faulty ..... eh?snip
That's true but I've yet to ever read one word about Ann Coulter on these boards without the wordsThat's not even close to what I said, nor what might be inferred from my post. That's just ranting.
My point is that the right-wingers of this nation latch onto anything that the Democrats do that's even the slightest bit of an issue and treat it as though it's the worst thing in the world. Anything. Hell, I've listened to Rush Limbloat spend almost an entire HOUR on what Nancy Pelosi LOOKS LIKE. I've seen entire political newspaper articles talk about what Hillary Clinton was WEARING at a speech and whether or not it was "appropriate."
I didn't realize anyone was for 17 year olds getting pregnant. Because you preach a value doesn't mean you'll end up being morally infallible. We are all human, after all. I think it's even more hypocritical to scream at others to quit being so judgmental and then to be just that!So for you, clearly espousing the self-proclaimed right-wing agenda of prudence and highly-moral principles, to deny that there might be ANY issue with this 17-year old pregnancy is absolutely ludicrous.
It is an issue, if you want to make it one. I hope you were just as hard on Al Gore when his drunk(been arrested), fat pot smoking(been arrested again) son was arrested, yet again, for doing 94mph on a N. Carolina interstate.Or maybe I'm just too dumb to understand. You seem to be the authority of the high-brow debate club around here, so maybe you can all teach us a lesson on how this is a "non-issue?"
This is why you aren't a credible thinker.Whaat, whaat?? You're breaking up. .... snoopy..... .... faulty ..... eh?
You know damn well that if she were the Democratic VP candidate, you'd be all over this issue like white on rice. And you would NEVER hear the end of it from Rush Limbloat, "female impersonator" Ann Coulter, and the other Republikkkan righties.
Good luck trying to convince America that Mr and Mrs Palin are bad people becuase they are a married couple that doesn't use birth control. That rule only applies to low income couples.
Tell that to all the AA women having all those kids out of wedlock.
TonyB;2667024 Really??? I suggest you look no further than the current First Family. There are enough skeletons in that closet to fill a cemetery.[/QUOTE said:Clintons & Kennedys have enough skeletons to populate a large city.
So there you go.
Do you have any proof that they don't use birth control? Or are you just spouting off again?
I'm not interested in convincing anyone they're "bad". I'm interested in people learning about morality so they stop preying on gay people and their families/friends/society and stop overpopulating the planet. I'm interested in people learning so things like only less than 1% of the global HIV prevention budget targets gay/bi men don't happen. I'm interested in people learning so they don't ban gay men from donating sperm due to the unscientific prejudicial notion that somehow allowing them to be fathers would increase the number of gay people.
No, I was responding to Superstition. I never said that they don't, I said PERHAPS they believe in letting nature take its course. I don't care either way, they are married, they can do what they want.
As for the 'spouting off' takes one to know one.
Oh no Brer Fox! Don't go after the Bush children!!! Anything but that.Bottom line is that the Republikkkans do everything they can to cast aspersions at the Democrats for every issue, no matter how major or minor, but when the tables are turned against them, their only defense is, "Oh, look at those lousy Democrats turning every personal situation into a political issue. Shame on them for resorting to such 'dirty' politics."
It's actually quite amusing. And depressing.
By the way, Mr. Enlightened, you mentioned Al Gore's son. Do you REALLY want to get into a t!t-for-tat with the children of our past (or current) Presidents (or would-be Presidents)????
Really??? I suggest you look no further than the current First Family. There are enough skeletons in that closet to fill a cemetery.
wow. might as well elect britney spears mom to vice presidency too.
I'm suggesting her parents had the same problem when they got pregnant with their latest baby.
I see. Well, I can't say. I know very devout Christian families with 8 or more children, they don't use any form of birth control at all and just let nature take it's course. The Palins could be one of those families, we just don't know.
Very possibly so.
Good luck trying to convince America that Mr and Mrs Palin are bad people becuase they are a married couple that doesn't use birth control. That rule only applies to low income couples.
Al Gore's son is an adult, living on his own. He is responsible for his own actions. The Gores did what they could to raise their children, send them to college and send them out into the world. They have a pretty good batting average as far as families go.
Sarah Palin's daughter is still a minor, still in the home, still under the influence of her parents. As I said before, we don't know what happened. Perhaps her parents sat at the kitchen table with her, talking about biology and putting condoms on zucchini. Perhaps she was already on the pill and it failed because of some other medication or whatever. We don't know and its silly to make assumptions. Also, I have no idea how Sarah Palin feels about sex before marriage. Has she been quoted on this subject in the past or is everyone just assuming she has a stance because she is a Republican?
Oh.........you said "PERHAPS". If you don't know, then why say anything at all? And you do seem to care.....read the rest of your post.
His was first arrested when he was under aged. First for drunk driving and then for doing 97 in a 55 mph zone.Al Gore's son is an adult, living on his own. He is responsible for his own actions. The Gores did what they could to raise their children, send them to college and send them out into the world. They have a pretty good batting average as far as families go.
Sarah Palin's daughter is still a minor, still in the home, still under the influence of her parents. As I said before, we don't know what happened. Perhaps her parents sat at the kitchen table with her, talking about biology and putting condoms on zucchini. Perhaps she was already on the pill and it failed because of some other medication or whatever. We don't know and its silly to make assumptions. Also, I have no idea how Sarah Palin feels about sex before marriage. Has she been quoted on this subject in the past or is everyone just assuming she has a stance because she is a Republican?
Sarah Palin's daughter is still a minor, still in the home, still under the influence of her parents. As I said before, we don't know what happened. Perhaps her parents sat at the kitchen table with her, talking about biology and putting condoms on zucchini. Perhaps she was already on the pill and it failed because of some other medication or whatever. We don't know and its silly to make assumptions. Also, I have no idea how Sarah Palin feels about sex before marriage. Has she been quoted on this subject in the past or is everyone just assuming she has a stance because she is a Republican?
(pretend there's a post from superstition right here saying that everyone should use birth control because of global overpopulation)
Why is it silly to make assumptions when given a set of facts? Based on the information we know about this woman and her stances on various issues, I'd bet anything that the Palins didn't break out the zucchini for a biology lesson or the Palin youngster's birth control pills "failed". I'd also bet anything that Sarah Palin is against pre-marital sex for teenage girls, including her own.