D
Deleted member 25923
Guest
Who do you think the number one player with the worst FH or BH was?
It doesn't have to be both strokes, just one or the other.
It doesn't have to be both strokes, just one or the other.
Quite a few. Moya and Courier's backhands. Rafter and Edberg's forehands. McEnroe's forehand and backhand.
Have to agree with Moya's backhand. I'll add Safin in for forehand.
Federer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
Federer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
Federer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
Quite a few. Moya and Courier's backhands. Rafter and Edberg's forehands. McEnroe's forehand and backhand.
I'll add Safin in for forehand.
Sampras' poor BH was the result of the old crap Archaic Wilson Pro Staff. Look at his BH today with the new racket. Its better than Roger's
Federer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
Oh come on, it's clear you say that ONLY because you dislike these two.
The thread asks for the number one(s) with the worst.
I'm pretty sure Fed's backhand is much much better than the backhands of people like Roddick, among others =.=
kthxFederer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
Sampras' poor BH was the result of the old crap Archaic Wilson Pro Staff. Look at his BH today with the new racket. Its better than Roger's
Federer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
It isn't better than Roger's I'm afraid. Pete hasn't had Nadal pounding high deep forehands at it. Are you going on the exhibitions and senior tour? For me, Federer is far stronger on both wings from the baseline.
Can I just ask how the racket affected it in any way? He could still pound his serves and forehands. His backhand just wasn't a particularly strong shot. Deal with it.
EDIT:
I'm sorry, the Federer backhand is a great stroke. Sure, it breaks down when he has to play deep balls over his hand, this is tough for any one-hander. This is the same reason that ten year olds who have just started the game
can beat players far better than them. High balls are horrible to play against, especially for one handers, and I would know, I've got one. You don't play tennis, do you? I don't think you qualify to talk about the subject.\
I would say Mcenroes groundstrokes, but seeing as he was always at the net, it doesn't really matter.
No, just no. This is delusional.
i agree but nadal's backhand has improved but I still consider it to be quite weakNadals backhand
Roddicks Backhand
Moyas backhand
Fed homers can't admit Fed has a flaw. lol
Which explains why Nadal always beats Fed on the surface that relies the most on groundstrokes and the least on serves.Federer's backhand is better than Nadals :-?
Which explains why Nadal always beats Fed on the surface that relies the most on groundstrokes and the least on serves.
he does have flaws but they werent there when he was at number oneFed homers can't admit Fed has a flaw. lol
You don't win the French Open 4 times in a row with a weak backhand. The surface exploits those that are slightly weak from the baseline. Fed relies a ton on his serve and the clay takes a lot of that away. Thus, it shows how weak his backhand is.
Wrong. The serve plays a big part on faster surfaces. Thus you don't have to win most of the baseline battles as the serve can cover it up. Just ask Roddick about that. lolYou don't win the US open 5 times in a row with a weak backhand. The surface exploits those that are slightly weak from the baseline. Nadal relies a ton on his movement and the hard court takes a lot of that away. Thus, it shows how weak his backhand is.
You don't win the French Open 4 times in a row with a weak backhand. The surface exploits those that are slightly weak from the baseline. Fed relies a ton on his serve and the clay takes a lot of that away. Thus, it shows how weak his backhand is.
Federer's backhand and Sampras's backhand come to mind.
I'd rather have Federer's backhand than Nadal's serve. At least the former is a very good shot, while the later is the worst serve in the #1 ranking history.