Richie Rich
Legend
just don't respond to this guy. just posting crap to pull your guys' chain
Maybe its a paint job and maybe its not. Its just speculation at this point.
You may decide that you value the opinions that it was a paint job.....but thats all it is...an opinion. No one really knows.
just don't respond to this guy. just posting crap to pull your guys' chain
Maybe its a paint job and maybe its not. Its just speculation at this point.
You may decide that you value the opinions that it was a paint job.....but thats all it is...an opinion. No one really knows.
King of Aces, in an honest attempt to possibly finally get through to you..please consider this.
Federer says "I switched from a 85 to a 90 just before Hamburg"
he did so as an experiement for that tournament
then he made the final decision to
"switch to a 90"
In the picture you posted, it's clear to me that the racquet he's playing with is NOT a 95, so where is your proof?
If you paint the word FORD on a Chevrolet, does it make the Chevy a Ford? No, it doesn't. And painting a racquet to look like a model of a different head size doesn't make it larger.
To further that thought, when you watch stock car racing and they have, pick a car, a Ford Taurus looking race car. Does that make it a real Ford Taurus? Do they really go 180 mph?
Way back when, Rod Laver signed a big endorsement to play with Chemhold racquets. They were really crappy, but they offerred him some dough, so he did it. Laver thought he could play with anything, but developed a really bad elbow because of it. He broke out his old Dunlop Forts and bought some gold spray paint and painted them gold like the metal Chemhold he was paid to use. Did that make his Dunlops become Chemholds?
Ilie Nastase played with the Dunlop Fort as well. He won many tournaments with it. But then, he signed an all-encompassing deal with Adidas. They built him a frame, the Adidas Haillet. I bought one in 1978 and still have it. But, Nastase opted to have his Dunlops painted to look like the new Adidas racquet. Because they were painted to look like the Haillet, did they become the Haillet?
Ivan Lendl began his career with the Kneissel White Star frame. Later, he too signed an all encompassing deal with Adidas. Adidas got Kniessel to make the frame under the Adidas name. Did the frame magically morph into a different frame? And then Lendl signed another deal with Mizuno. He stenciled his old racuqet with the Mizuno stencil. Did that make it a Mizuno mid size even though it was really a Kniessel built Adidas labeled standard sized frame?
Back in the day, Jose Luis Clerc changed his sponsorship from Rossignol to ProKennex. He tried the Golden Ace, but never could get used to it. He then painted his Rossignols black and stenciled them ProKennex. Now, you probably aren't aware, but the Golden Ace was a wood frame with an open throat and the Rossignol he played with was a standard wood racquet. The question for you is, just because he stenciled his frame ProKennex, did that make it in fact become a ProKennex?
Later, Boris Becker changed his sponsorship from Puma to other brands because Puma owed him money. Rather than change frames, Becker bought the mould and Head agreed to run some off for him at a nominal fee. Becker then stenciled them ESTUSA. Did that make the frames ESTUSA?
Andre Agassi signed a big deal with Donnay. They built him a special racquet. Agassi tried the racquet but didn't like it. Rather than communicate that to Donnay, he just took his old Prince Graphite OS frame and stenciled it with a big "D" for Donnay. Did that make his Prince Graphite OS become a Donnay Pro OS?
Pat Rafter played a seniors event a couple of months ago. His racquet was painted to look like a Dunlop. But when you got up close you could see that it was a Prince frame painted to look like a Dunlop. The bumper guard and clear plastic bridge in the throat were give aways. In your view, is this frame a Dunlop because it's painted to look like a Dunlop or a Prince because that is who really made it?
And finally, how old are you and what level do you play?
I'd really be interested to get your answers to these questions.
Dude, it should be clear to you now that Federer doesn't play with a Wilson frame. This is a Keebler. It is hand made secretly by the Keebler elves in a tree in an undisclosed location.
Besides he firther adds that after that he switched to switching from an 85 he switched to a 90 was shankoing the ball and then switched to a 90.
Ah, but the failing of your post is that you give logic backed up by facts. And these clearly are useless. Because after all, no one ever knows anything apparently.
It is very easy they have two different molds and string patterns.I did and you are right.....so how the hell can you tell from a picture that its a 90 and not a 95?
Lets say this Mr. "Ron" person meant exactly as you say.
How does Mr. "Ron" know what the materials inside the K90 are? How Does he know that the 4 "K" factors were not taken out and that Roger for that matter is really still playing with an Ncode or his original racquet and never changed?
Roger and Sampras do not believe in changing racquets and I doubt that Federer ever changed except from his 85 to a 90 or from his 85 to a 95 and then to a 90.
I dont think anyone can be absolutely sure.
Its all speculation as neither Wilson or Roger will comment.
that doesnt make sense...how does one change from an 85 to a 90 and then change to a 90???? I believe that was a typo....what he may have meant was that he changed from an 85 to a 95 ...shanked a lot of balls and then changed to a 90.Remember....he is just a tennis pro, unlike Obama he can make some incorrect comments.
In any event even assuming arguendo that somehow that is what he meant , he still never said that his Hyper Prostaff 95 was a paintjob. He still may have dabbled with a 95 for some time. We just dont know...its truly speulation and we can debate this ad nauseum.
The 2003 Wimbledon Championships. Federer's first grand slam win.Yup that makes sense ...Roger swutched from his 95 to a 90.......but I think that he should now probably go back with the stick that won himn his first grand slam....his trusty old 95 inch racquet.
Thanks! So you've never played tennis and your mom doesn't know you are a troll on the internet. That helps.
“No, I've always been very happy,” said Federer. “I never really tried a bigger head-size racquet. I don't think it would maybe help me much."
Wikipedia said:Internet bots, also known as web robots, WWW robots or simply bots, are software applications that run automated tasks over the Internet. Typically, bots perform tasks that are both simple and structurally repetitive, at a much higher rate than would be possible for a human alone. The largest use of bots is in web spidering, in which an automated script fetches, analyses and files information from web servers at many times the speed of a human. Each server can have a file called robots.txt, containing rules for the spidering of that server that the bot is supposed to obey.
Gorecki said:Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible
Or in other words ....King Of Aces.
And how do you know then that no one knows if no one knows for sure that anything is known?
im still waiting for you to post us one picture where Federer uses a 16x18...
may we are all just speculating...
:twisted:
I would except I have no idea what you are talking about.
volleynet said:Besides he firther adds that after that he switched to switching from an 85 he switched to a 90 was shankoing the ball and then switched to a 90-KOA
hahahaahha YOU idiot you quoted your own post!!!!! KOA is you! LOLOLOL I was quoting you in my sig!!!exactly my point!! that doesnt make sense.
Why would federer say he was shanking the ball with a 90 so he switched to a 90??
Its a typo or something. What federer had to of meant was that he switched to a 95 and was shanking the ball so he switched to a 90.
.
hahahaahha YOU idiot you quoted your own post!!!!! KOA is you! LOLOLOL I was quoting you in my sig!!!
And you just said Federer had to of meant AHAHAHAHAAH!!
drakulie, off topic, but when did your great friend nobadmojo leave the boards.
Thats funny. For some reason i saw K factoor and not KOA....LOL.
But anyway you get my point. Why would Federer say he shanked the ball with a 90 and therefore changed to a 90???
.
No KOA Federer is saying that he shanked the ball with the 85 before swithing to a 90.
"Players must, however, note that Federer's racquet is custom made for him by Wilson and thus will play considerably differently to an off-the-shelf (stock) kSix-One. Indeed, the make of Roger's racquet beneath its paintjob has for some time been a subject of avid and heated speculation by a large number of racquet enthusiasts on a number of tennis forums, with the general consensus being that Roger Federer is using a specially designed Prostaff 6.0 Original, altered to a 90 sq.in. head but with the same string pattern and frame composition as the 6.0. While from a distance the racquet appears to be a Tour 90, upon closer examination, the throat and custom made extended handle are clearly of the Prostaff 6.0 mould. Nonetheless, the paintjob, tapered throat flanges (not present in the Prostaff 6.0 Original 85) and extended handle ensure that the true identity of Roger Federer's racquet remains a mystery to all, perhaps including Federer himself."
KOA, make it simple for us:
Your Age:
Your Level:
Your Tennis background/experience:
As far as I can tell, this is the only thing that thus far "no one knows for sure".
This post sums up what we have been trying to tell you ****. That Federer uses a 90. You highlighted the stupid information. I highlighted what you should have read. Why do you only read the beginning and end of things. Read what it actually says for once.
KOA, make it simple for us:
Your Age:
Your Level:
Your Tennis background/experience:
As far as I can tell, this is the only thing that thus far "no one knows for sure".
Thats funny. For some reason i saw K factoor and not KOA....LOL.
But anyway you get my point. Why would Federer say he shanked the ball with a 90 and therefore changed to a 90???
.
OMG...why do you guys resort to such cheap tricks. You conveniently left out the rest of the sentece and a KEY word:
with the general consensus being that Roger Federer is using a specially designed Prostaff 6.0 Original, altered to a 90 sq.in. head but with
That is the "general Consensus"......of what federer uses now. That means its a freaking opinion but that no one is sure!! Furthermore that does NOT mean that federer never used a 95. in fact the article goes on to read that no one really knows what federer uses.....probably even federer!!!
insiders like Ron and that Fed interview which know exactly what he uses. And you are quoting Wikipedia again? Idiot.
Here we go aagain. We have done this dance already.....but what the heck:
Insiders like Ron never said that Roger did not play with a 95 at one time.
Do you guys do this on purpose??
Federer trained secretly at my old club, TC Seeblick in Zurich last weekend.
Here is the link to the article. Sorry it is in German, but you can click on photo gallery to see Roger...
http://www.blick.ch/sport/tennis/federer-geheimtraining-in-zuerich-118517
I missed it, because I am now living in Lugano and changed clubs....
I am not trying to start a flame war but doesn't Federer's racket look like k95. His racket head looks bigger than the other guy's. Its an honest question. What you guys think? Please no silly replies like, he uses the big Bubba and what not.
Great pics BTW, Thanks for sharing.
I think the thing folks need to remember here is that the K90 and the K95 are almost IDENTICAL in head size. If you don't believe me, go down to your local tennis store, pick a sample of each, and hold them up to one another.
DO
FEDERER HIMSELF SAID HE NEVER TRIED A BIGGER HEADSIZE AND SWITCHED FROM 85 TO 90!
Thjat was Rabbits point as well.
Yea except for the fact that the Frame has a completely different shape and Federer's K90 has been measured and is in fact approximately a 90(closer to 88 )
These photos were taken today at Rolabd Garros during his match against Monfils.
vsbabolat said:You see the K90 has a string pattern of 16x19. That is 16 main strings and 19 crosses. While the 95 headsize fram has a string pattern of 16x18.]
so Federer is currently playing with a paintjob now as well???
.
[/QUOTE]Who cares about today? That does not prove that Federer did not use a 95 back in the day.
"Players must, however, note that Federer's racquet is custom made for him by Wilson and thus will play considerably differently to an off-the-shelf (stock) kSix-One. Indeed, the make of Roger's racquet beneath its paintjob has for some time been a subject of avid and heated speculation by a large number of racquet enthusiasts on a number of tennis forums, with the general consensus being that Roger Federer is using a specially designed Prostaff 6.0 Original, altered to a 90 sq.in. head but with the same string pattern and frame composition as the 6.0. While from a distance the racquet appears to be a Tour 90, upon closer examination, the throat and custom made extended handle are clearly of the Prostaff 6.0 mould. Nonetheless, the paintjob, tapered throat flanges (not present in the Prostaff 6.0 Original 85) and extended handle ensure that the true identity of Roger Federer's racquet remains a mystery to all, perhaps including Federer himself."
Who cares about today? That does not prove that Federer did not use a 95 back in the day.