Wuornos
Professional
I think the answer has to be because I think about losses as much as wins.
E.g. If we look at majors matches only quarter finals or better we see the following statistics:
Andre Agassi scores 49 wins and 28 losses or 63.6%.
Jimmy Connors clocks in with 54 wins and 33 losses or 62.1%
I know these players had long careers and played on where perhaps others retired but these volumes of losses at the highest level do seem substantial.
E.g.
Bjorn Borg 44 wins and 10 losses or 81.5%
Rod Laver even with his best years lost to the pro era 46 wins and 9 losses or 83.6%.
Pete Sampras 55 wins and 15 losses or 78.6%
Of course still to complete their careers so these data may well decline as yet are
Roger Federer 60 wins and 11 losses or 84.5%
Rafael Nadal 25 wins and 7 losses or 78.1%
Even some players who are held in much lower esteem, quite undeservedly so in my opinion
Ivan Lendl 55 wins and 26 losses or 67.9%
Mats Wilander 32 wins and 13 losses or 71.1%
Jim Courier 49 wins and 22 losses 69.0%.
To me it seems people are completely fixated on achievements and wins without ever considering failures and losses. They are opposite sides of the same coin and one must balance out the other in any form of evaluation.
Normally I look at things in a far more complex statistical way considering quality of opposition and adjustments for spread of results over time etc but I think the above says enough to bring my frustration to the fore.
Tim
E.g. If we look at majors matches only quarter finals or better we see the following statistics:
Andre Agassi scores 49 wins and 28 losses or 63.6%.
Jimmy Connors clocks in with 54 wins and 33 losses or 62.1%
I know these players had long careers and played on where perhaps others retired but these volumes of losses at the highest level do seem substantial.
E.g.
Bjorn Borg 44 wins and 10 losses or 81.5%
Rod Laver even with his best years lost to the pro era 46 wins and 9 losses or 83.6%.
Pete Sampras 55 wins and 15 losses or 78.6%
Of course still to complete their careers so these data may well decline as yet are
Roger Federer 60 wins and 11 losses or 84.5%
Rafael Nadal 25 wins and 7 losses or 78.1%
Even some players who are held in much lower esteem, quite undeservedly so in my opinion
Ivan Lendl 55 wins and 26 losses or 67.9%
Mats Wilander 32 wins and 13 losses or 71.1%
Jim Courier 49 wins and 22 losses 69.0%.
To me it seems people are completely fixated on achievements and wins without ever considering failures and losses. They are opposite sides of the same coin and one must balance out the other in any form of evaluation.
Normally I look at things in a far more complex statistical way considering quality of opposition and adjustments for spread of results over time etc but I think the above says enough to bring my frustration to the fore.
Tim