1. Federer 10 straight slam finals (winning 8 of them)
2. Federer, 22 straight slam semis (losing to eventual winner in each)
3. Federer, 65 straight wins on grass (5 wimbledons)
4. Federer, 237 consecutive weeks @ No. 1
5. Nadal, 81 straight wins on clay (2 french opens)
6. Laver, 4 straight slams
7. Sampras, 6 consecutive yearend No. 1s
8. Nadal, Borg, 4 straight french opens
9. Federer, 5 straight US Opens
10. Federer, Borg, 5 straight wimbledons
--------------------------
- The only reason Rod laver is at 6 is because of the lack of variety in surfaces those days. If somebody does it now (unlikely), it will be the greatest feat in all of sports. Fed came closest 3 times.
- IMO, 4 consecutive french opens > 5 consecutive wimbledons. Sustained domination at the french is harder.
- 65 wins / 5 years / 5 wimbledons > 81 / 2 years / 2 french opens.
I would like to see your lists and compile a consensus top 10.
2. Federer, 22 straight slam semis (losing to eventual winner in each)
3. Federer, 65 straight wins on grass (5 wimbledons)
4. Federer, 237 consecutive weeks @ No. 1
5. Nadal, 81 straight wins on clay (2 french opens)
6. Laver, 4 straight slams
7. Sampras, 6 consecutive yearend No. 1s
8. Nadal, Borg, 4 straight french opens
9. Federer, 5 straight US Opens
10. Federer, Borg, 5 straight wimbledons
--------------------------
- The only reason Rod laver is at 6 is because of the lack of variety in surfaces those days. If somebody does it now (unlikely), it will be the greatest feat in all of sports. Fed came closest 3 times.
- IMO, 4 consecutive french opens > 5 consecutive wimbledons. Sustained domination at the french is harder.
- 65 wins / 5 years / 5 wimbledons > 81 / 2 years / 2 french opens.
I would like to see your lists and compile a consensus top 10.
Last edited: