There is so much trash in this post that it's hard to know where to begin!
About the Spanish list, there is not a single clue or indication of any sort that Nadal was ever on that list. He had never consulted and was not linked in any way to that doctor.
Rafa did complain a lot about his knees before, during and after the pre-Wimbledon exhos.
The only one with a suspicion of doping hanging over his head at RG is Soderling because of the missed test.
Nadal did NOT practise while recovering. That is complete bull. He practised a little before W because he had hopes he would be able to play (but he didn't play at all for 2 weeks after he lost at RG), he didn't play for weeks from the moment he gave up playing W. Get your facts straight because you're downright lying about this.
It is also complete bull that tendinitis should terminate one's career. Even Roddick testified that it's a problem one can manage. Overuse is the worst enemy of tendinitis though. Roddick has never won 5 tournaments in 5 months including 1 slam 3 masters, 1 500 and 2 other finals. It's the amount of playing that did Rafa in this year but any doctor will tell you one can overcome tendinitis with rest. It is NOT and has never been a career threatening injury.
About not winning, it takes time to come back after injury (and Rafa contracted a stomach tear probably from trying to spare his knees wile serving). Also Rafa had long title droughts before, especially in the second part of the season, very usual pattern for him. Hum, what tournaments has Fed won between Basel 2008 and Madrid 2009? That's a long title drought. Thanks for letting me know it has everything to do with doping and nothing with bad form.
You say "Federer has always peaked when he needed to", that would be a damning argument in favor of Fed's doping. How could you possibly always be at your best when you WANT to be unless you dope? This is actually the best argument to exonerate Rafa of any cheating. If he was doping, don't you think he would make sure he is at his peak during RG/W? Of course he would! The fact that the timing for his lowest form of the year was SO disastrous to his ranking and his career in general is the most convincing proof that there was no foulplay involved. Even a simpleton would understand that... but why do I feel that I'm overestimating you already :???:
Well said. With a dad like his, Andre is lucky he didn't end up as a serial killer!
I think he managed his life pretty well, considering. Despite the meth, he should be proud of himself for somehow making it through with honors.
(Wow I almost forgot this was a thread about Agassi with all those rambling rants about Nadal!)
ninman, here's what we have:
Agassi admitted he lied, and on more than one occasion. In fact, he seems to actually flaunt it, imo.
Nadal has one muscular arm and is the same body weight as Federer.
Gasquet claims he's innocent. I don't know, and can't speculate on that.
But, maybe that's the difference. I'm not speculating. I'm dealing with cold, hard facts, not wishful thinking. It's irresponsible to smear someone's name without proof...or remorse.
And for those who call others who judge Agassi hypocritical and in the next breath align themselves with this kind of nonsense,...well.
Anyway, it's doubtful we'll agree on anything.
Absolutely beautiful summation. I think everything's covered in this.
So Sampras is still the Goat as Sampras should be awarded a few of those slams that he lost v Agassi when Agassi took drugs to cheat.
how cute. now lets hear you two agree like that on the subject of this thread... Agassi? liar and criminal or a gentleman and a legend...?
ps: something tells me you two have not debated this whole agassi thing...
Gosh, you're funny. You really were confused that we have different brains? That's hilarious!
Overuse is the worst enemy of tendinitis though. Roddick has never won 5 tournaments in 5 months.
by the way that this has gone, if the las vegas cops got to interrogate agassi, he would confess to a number of unsolved killings there too :shock:
So Sampras is still the Goat as Sampras should be awarded a few of those slams that he lost v Agassi when Agassi took drugs to cheat.
So Sampras is still the Goat as Sampras should be awarded a few of those slams that he lost v Agassi when Agassi took drugs to cheat.
He continued to use drugs after 1997.
He continued to use drugs after 1997.
you do? no one would tell...
It is to funny how some of the fed lovers are so obsessed with nadal cheating with some kind of doping.It must really crush them how nadal has taken their hero to the wood shed so many times.But it definitely boarders on weird when they are literally praying for him to get busted.
Eufemiano Fuentes told Cadena Ser radio: "I'm angry about the whole matter. I've worked with other sports; tennis, football and athletics. There are a lot of names that haven't come out."
Yeah because Doctor Fuentes has reason to lie right?
And we should just believe the Spanish anti-doping authorities right!? Because they would turn in their national hero Rafael Nadal right?
Nadal is not the only one with big muscles. In fact, there are guys like Monfils that have even bigger guns. Stosur, Serena, Roddick, Dementieva, Hewitt, Verdasco, Safina all are very muscular.
But just because you don't have muscles, doesn't mean you're not doping.
Guys like Simon or Davydenko, who can play for hours without getting tired and without having a great phisique are just as suspicious as Rafa is.
Says who??
I think you also might be abit angry that Sampras' record has been broken and you clearly haven't moved on from that.