Its not a debate. Pretty much every tennis pundit on the planet called Justine out for the FO and for the AO as well as Serena for the USO.
Its only a debate to you.
When the AO match was going down, illness or not, all the commentators were saying how 'unfortunate' it was that Henin couldnt hang on to give Mauresmo a chance to hear Game. Set. Match. And 'unfortunate' is commentator-speak for classless and bad form. And believe me, that was the talk for ages about Henin. Thats why during the Wimbledon final so much was made that at least that time Momo got to actually 'win' the match. Its not a debate, its common knowledge that justine has shown dubious on court integrity. Do you even know what bad form means?
Then again, given your position in this thread, Im not suprised if you don't. :-?
because the chair ump didn't see it
Lets continue this train of logic. So the ump can do two things. He can say I didnt see it play on, no debates no appeals.
Or he can say well, I didnt see it but let me ask the other player if they had their hand up. Cant it be reasonably inferred from the second scenario that the time would have been granted if the Umo had seen it , else why bother asking the other player? And if the other player lies.....
See how thats cheating now?