I am thinking of going for a reel of the new stuff.. Would love to hear feeback. Sounds like the new one is going be a bit crisper and more durable.
Regards,
Steve
yes, Max Touch is the Pro Supex Maxim Touch.
I'll email you the link to purchase it.
Just played the new stuff, 17 gauge, strung at 52 lbs., on my Aerogel 100.
Ugh.
I hope I'm wrong about this, but the string just didn't seem as lively as the old stuff. I'm not sure "stiff" is the word I'm looking for. Maybe "sluggish." I was laboring to hit my usual shots, and I noticed it primarily on the serve and fending of body shots.
Who knows? Maybe I was having a bad night. Maybe the new stuff needs a little more break in. But I didn't get the usual friendly feel I've always gotten from the old MT.
I'll post more on second review.
Dang, I'm not liking that initial review. I love how MT adds power to a flexible control oriented frame.
Just played the new stuff, 17 gauge, strung at 52 lbs., on my Aerogel 100.
Ugh.
I hope I'm wrong about this, but the string just didn't seem as lively as the old stuff. I'm not sure "stiff" is the word I'm looking for. Maybe "sluggish." I was laboring to hit my usual shots, and I noticed it primarily on the serve and fending of body shots.
Who knows? Maybe I was having a bad night. Maybe the new stuff needs a little more break in. But I didn't get the usual friendly feel I've always gotten from the old MT.
I'll post more on second review.
Most people don't characterise MT as a string that "adds power".
My second hit was more positive.
Admittedly, I was playing a bit better. I think the break in may have helped. Maybe it was all in my mind. Still, as of now, I prefer the old version. It just had that soft yet lively feel I'm used to.
I compared two frames during a changeover, one strung with the new 17 with about two hours of play, and one strung with the old 17 with about 7-8 hours of play. The old stuff appeared off-white, slightly opaque, with little wear. The new stuff looked yellowish, translucent and, get this, had very minor fraying in the sweet spot. Weird.
Still don't have enough court time to make truly objective assessment. So I'm very much looking forward to hearing from the rest of you. Please chime in when you can.
Damp
I hope I'm wrong about this, but the string just didn't seem as lively as the old stuff. I'm not sure "stiff" is the word I'm looking for. Maybe "sluggish." I was laboring to hit my usual shots, and I noticed it primarily on the serve and fending of body shots.
It's more powerful than kevlar, poly and synthetic gut to me.
from everything I have read so far, the new MT doesn't offer any compelling reasons to switch from the old.
But so is EVERY multi
^^Agreed. Fact that it didn't feel like it was "breaking in", could have been a contributing factor to not feeling as "lively".
After getting back home and checking the DT, I was thinking I may want to lower the tension a bit for my next re-string.
I'll know more tonight.
from everything I have read so far, the new MT doesn't offer any compelling reasons to switch from the old.
If you could pick up a couple of reels of the old or new, which would you go for?
Mine is fraying as it wears, kinda like NXT. Is yours fraying, too, Drak?
I never got that with the old stuff. It would just pop on me.
Hmm, the old MT has never frayed on me. That is a pet peeve of mine with string. Again, not liking the initial comments.
Question for MT users - how do you suppose this stuff would fare in a hybrid with a poly main? I've got NRG2 in the cross of my setup right now (Kirschbaum P2 in the main at 59#, NRG2 in the cross at 61#) and it's solid, but I don't want to lay out the cash for a reel of NRG2 if I can avoid it, and it's moving a lot after 5 hours.
As you can see from my post above, the old stuff probably won't get you 5 hours. It all depends on your stroke though. If the wear is similar, or worse as some are saying, I would not expect much. But I'd love to hear from anyone with this setup on the new formulation.
I hate strings that fray. Just a mental block I have but I might be looking for a new string.
Being that I'm using an 18x20, I tend to kill strings tension-wise before I pop them - the NRG2 is pretty well worn, but still has life left. It's shot tension-wise though.
@ The Dampener...Wow. The new stuff seems to wear really badly. Alot of tension loss as well. They seem to have made it a bit too soft.....
Is the tension loss your experience?
I haven't noticed it so much, but I'm not measuring. I actually like the string better as it breaks in a bit.
I had my first hit last night with the new MT. Head Microgel Prestige Pro, string at 63 lbs (17 gauge).
I had a somewhat similar experience. String felt very good, but did not seem/feel as lively as the original version, and I would agree that it felt a bit "sluggish", as Dampener pointed out. I wasn't laboring as dampener experienced, and felt it provided the great control, spin, and pop of the original. I'm hoping, like dampener, I have a better second hit with the string.
One other thing I want to point out is I did an ERT reading of the string bed after stringing and got a 42 reading. Before I took it out for a hit yesterday (approx 24 hours later), I got the same reading. After my hit that lasted one hour, I again got the same reading (42). So, no tension loss.