FO surface fastest in 20 years

sureshs · May 27, 2010

First it was Isner, then I heard Todd Woodbridge telling the Tennis Channel yesterday that this was the fastest the surface has played in 20 years of his experience.

When Nadal wins this, it will be difficult for certain people to trash it as a win on a slow surface.

Nadalfan89 · May 27, 2010

People managed to trash Nadal when he beat Federer on grass...this win will be easy as hell to take apart.

sureshs · May 27, 2010

Nadalfan89 said:
People managed to trash Nadal when he beat Federer on grass...this win will be easy as hell to take apart.

Oh that when he forced Federer to play in poor light at 9 pm. That win doesn't count.

Nadalfan89 · May 27, 2010

sureshs said:
Oh that when he forced Federer to play in poor light at 9 pm. That win doesn't count.

It doesn't count because it was extremely slow, grass looking clay. Might as well have played on sand...

jackson vile · May 27, 2010

Face it, the AO win against Fed didn't count either. As a matter of fact anytime anyone beats Federer it does not count, cause it's no fair!!!

Backbored · May 27, 2010

sureshs said:
First it was Isner, then I heard Todd Woodbridge telling the Tennis Channel yesterday that this was the fastest the surface has played in 20 years of his experience.

When Nadal wins this, it will be difficult for certain people to trash it as a win on a slow surface.

Not anymore with the rain. It’s back to slowmo now.

Blinkism · May 27, 2010

Nadal never really beat Federer.

Federer only beats himself.

P_Agony · May 27, 2010

Blinkism said:
Nadal never really beat Federer.

Federer only beats himself.

Nadal was never beaten by a player.

The injury only beats Nadal.

;-)

Bryan Swartz · May 27, 2010

I'm sensing a pattern here. The way we can tell that a Grand Slam win counts(the opposing pov that one could ever not count being flatly idiotic on it's face) is when Federer doesn't lose. Federer wins = it counts. Federer loses = it doesn't count, because that's a violation of the laws of nature.

Do I have that right?

Backbored · May 27, 2010

Blinkism said:
Nadal never really beat Federer.

Federer only beats himself.

So your saying Fed just chocked the three times he lost to Nadal in the finales?

Leonidas · May 27, 2010

It may not count for idiot and clowns, of which we have plenty on this forum, but in terms of history, real fans, newspapers...Every title counts.

Blinkism · May 27, 2010

Backbored said:
So your saying Fed just chocked the three times he lost to Nadal in the finales?

He tanked?

Chris Rizutto · May 27, 2010

Id love to see anyone win except that greasy azzed, butt picking, finger sniffing, apelike liar and a fake Nadal.

fed_rulz · May 27, 2010

Bryan Swartz said:
I'm sensing a pattern here. The way we can tell that a Grand Slam win counts(the opposing pov that one could ever not count being flatly idiotic on it's face) is when Federer doesn't lose. Federer wins = it counts. Federer loses = it doesn't count, because that's a violation of the laws of nature.

Do I have that right?

yeah, according to *******s....

Backbored · May 27, 2010

Blinkism said:
He tanked?

LOL yes. Choked.
BTW Was it at the FO that Rafa choked on a banana?

AndyArodRoddick · May 27, 2010

Kidding me ? Its way slower than last year..maybe because of the weather, but still I make my point.

Lenglen is the slowest without a doubt.

valiant · May 27, 2010

Is it time to make wimby fast too. EXCITEMENT

Speranza · May 27, 2010

Watson: Roll up! Roll up! The doors are open!

Free admission for all *******s! Plenty of seats available!

valiant · May 27, 2010

Speranza said:
Watson: Roll up! Roll up! The doors are open!

Free admission for all *******s! Plenty of seats available!

I wanted to join in the fun. Ah I am disqualified now

zagor · May 27, 2010

It's an conspiracy!!!

Cesc Fabregas · May 27, 2010

I LOVE how Sureshs trolls on Federer one day and Nadal the next day.

valiant · May 27, 2010

Cesc Fabregas said:
I LOVE how Sureshs trolls on Federer one day and Nadal the next day.

He is the Legend.

zagor · May 27, 2010

Suresh's trolling is art

Speranza · May 27, 2010

Speranza said:
Watson: Roll up! Roll up! The doors are open!

Free admission for all *******s! Plenty of seats available!

valiant said:
I wanted to join in the fun. Ah I am disqualified now

Watson:....Be quiet, take a seat at the back, I won't tell anyone....

zagor said:
It's an conspiracy!!!

Holmes: LOL! No it is't.

P_Agony · May 27, 2010

Speranza said:
Watson: Roll up! Roll up! The doors are open!

Free admission for all *******s! Plenty of seats available!

May I ask who Watson's and Holmes' favorite player is?

valiant · May 27, 2010

Watson:....Be quiet, take a seat at the back, I won't tell anyone....

OK. Our little secret.

sureshs · May 27, 2010

The balls are bouncing so high that the Woodies said the back courts don't have enough space behind the baseline to play from.

Todd said he would not like to face Nadal under these conditions.

Seems as though Nadal strikes terror in the hearts of players, something that Federer never could.

P_Agony · May 27, 2010

sureshs said:
The balls are bouncing so high that the Woodies said the back courts don't have enough space behind the baseline to play from.

Todd said he would not like to face Nadal under these conditions.

Seems as though Nadal strikes terror in the hearts of players, something that Federer never could.

Nadal strikes terror alright...

sdont · May 27, 2010

Yep. Fastest in 20 years. That's why Roddick got broken like 6-7 times in 3 sets today.

Another win thread by sureshs.

jigar · May 27, 2010

well not after two days of rain.

jackson vile · May 27, 2010

sureshs said:
The balls are bouncing so high that the Woodies said the back courts don't have enough space behind the baseline to play from.

Todd said he would not like to face Nadal under these conditions.

Seems as though Nadal strikes terror in the hearts of players, something that Federer never could.

No, Roger warms their hearts with a nice cup of coco. Unlike that other jerk!

Cyan · May 27, 2010

sureshs said:
First it was Isner, then I heard Todd Woodbridge telling the Tennis Channel yesterday that this was the fastest the surface has played in 20 years of his experience.

When Nadal wins this, it will be difficult for certain people to trash it as a win on a slow surface.

Amazing how the French will do the utmost possible to kiss Fed's hairy ass

valiant · May 27, 2010

Cyan said:
Amazing how the French will do the utmost possible to kiss Fed's hairy ass

How do you know about IT being HAIRY.

Cyan · May 27, 2010

valiant said:
How do you know about IT being HAIRY.

:lol:

frisco · May 27, 2010

Fast clay???? Is this simply pre-preparation of an excuse in case Nadal loses?

Bud · May 27, 2010

Backbored said:
So your saying Fed just chocked the three times he lost to Nadal in the finales?

3 times? Lol! Better go recheck that stat

veroniquem · May 27, 2010

frisco said:
Fast clay???? Is this simply pre-preparation of an excuse in case Nadal loses?

No, it's what every player and pundit has been saying since the start of the tournament. Paranoid much??

Anaconda · May 27, 2010

sdont said:
Yep. Fastest in 20 years. That's why Roddick got broken like 6-7 times in 3 sets today.

Another win thread by sureshs.

Haven't you heard? Federer has the best serve in the game, let's see how many times he gets broken to determine the court speed.

Rippy · May 27, 2010

Cyan said:
Amazing how the French will do the utmost possible to kiss Fed's hairy ass

Then why have they put him on Lenglen?

Cyan · May 27, 2010

FO is playing like HC. Now we have 3 HC slams. Isner served like 40 aces today.

Speranza · May 27, 2010

P_Agony said:
May I ask who Watson's and Holmes' favorite player is?

Holmes: You may indeed. It is the player who, in our opinion, has the most beautiful game, is the most creative shot maker... and whose on court demeanour we admire most.

Watson: in the case that Holmes hasn't made himself clear, we think you might admire him also...If avatars are anything to go by.

Cyan · May 27, 2010

Rippy said:
Then why have they put him on Lenglen?

They had no other option. Better third on SL than last on PC.

Backbored · May 27, 2010

Bud said:
3 times? Lol! Better go recheck that stat

Okay I’m may be old, but I thought they played each other three time for the championship at the FO.

ChanceEncounter · May 27, 2010

Bryan Swartz said:
I'm sensing a pattern here. The way we can tell that a Grand Slam win counts(the opposing pov that one could ever not count being flatly idiotic on it's face) is when Federer doesn't lose. Federer wins = it counts. Federer loses = it doesn't count, because that's a violation of the laws of nature.

Do I have that right?

No, Nadal only loses if he was tired or injured.

WTF is the point of this thread? I don't want to see a single ******* ever act self-righteous again after seeing this thread. You're just as bad as the worst of the *******s.

sh@de · May 27, 2010

This thread really shows how paranoid *******s are...

SoBad · May 27, 2010

If Nadal were to take the title on the red grass of Paris against all odds, where would that place him among the greatest grasscourt players of the open era?

Al Czervik · May 27, 2010

Bob Brett says these guys are serving up "superballs." No idea if that's valid or not.

Andres · May 27, 2010

Cyan said:
FO is playing like HC. Now we have 3 HC slams. Isner served like 40 aces today.

Isner would serve 40 aces over 4 sets on ANY surface, no matter how slow it is.

Falloutjr · May 27, 2010

Andres said:
Isner would serve 40 aces over 4 sets on ANY surface, no matter how slow it is.

Isner could hit 40 aces playing on a Tempur-pedic mattress.

ViscaB · May 27, 2010

I'm surprised they didn't put some grass in. Anyway Nadal won the best ever game on grass so I don't think it will bother him.

FO surface fastest in 20 years

Bionic Poster

Hall of Fame

Bionic Poster

Hall of Fame

G.O.A.T.

Hall of Fame

Legend

Banned

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Professional

Legend

Banned

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Professional

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Bionic Poster

Legend

Hall of Fame

Bionic Poster

Hall of Fame

Banned

Hall of Fame

Bionic Poster

Banned

Legend

Professional

G.O.A.T.

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Banned

Bionic Poster

Bionic Poster

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame

Professional

Hall of Fame

G.O.A.T.

Hall of Fame

G.O.A.T.

Banned

Hall of Fame

Similar threads