You're exactly right. But my point was, sometimes the problem WAS the press. You can take a press conference transcript and then go back and see how a question was answered in an article and tell that some journalists were very loose with the context of the answer.
Frankly, some people wrote articles in ways that their editors wanted them to in order to sell more copies. And then they were framed with ridiculous headlines that had almost nothing to do with what was said in the interview.
An example is Wimbledon 1984 when people are asking Hana about what she thought her chances were to win it. Even Bud Collins says in his commentary during NBC's coverage of Hana's win over Tanvier that if anyone is going to beat Martina, it's Hana and not Chris.
Fast forward to NBC's coverage of the final and Bud is falling all over himself to say that Hana shouldn't have talked about beating Martina in the final. Well, that was the question she was being asked, "Can you beat Martina again?" Obviously, she's not on Martina's side of the draw, so if she were to beat Martina it would have to be after beating Chris and getting to the final. If anyone is implying anything, it's the questioner. But that's not what sells papers.
Translation: "Hana looks past Chris and openly talks about beating Martina in the final."
I can see why people (particularly those whose English isn't that great) might mistrust the media and have a chip on their shoulder. Shoot, even Mac, Connros, Martina and Chris carried their grudges against certain journalists because they were either misquoted or they published info. they considered off the record. If they can do that to them, they can easily do it to Lendl and Mandlikova. Throw in the communist (which neither were) angle and it's like watching Rocky IV.
Ok, but the press didn't just do that to Eastern Bloc players they are always trying to get a quote or story.
Lendl started playing well before Rocky IV came out.