Nadal's looking unstoppable

Talker

Hall of Fame
Djokovic is in Nadal's way if he makes it past Federer.
There's nothing I can see that Nadal has changed to bother Djokovic either.
He can still beat Djokovic if he's at his best though.

Djokovic won't have the problems of the past with endurance and heat, his game looks as good as last year and may even be a touch better as he has the confidence at a higher level than this time last year.
 
Nadal tends to get better with ever match in slams. This may well be his 2nd best start to an AO. He looks sharper than he looked at the beginning of last year's AO, that is for sure. Either way, Haas has a high kicking ball which pushes Nadal back. Not many players can do that. Yet Nadal won with a lopsided scoreline and broke Haas at will.
 

ollinger

G.O.A.T.
Nadal looks throughly stoppable to me. Lots of his groundstrokes are landing short, the sort of thing Djokovic cleaned his clock on last year, and he's spraying too many groundstrokes wide. I can't imagine him beating Djoker the way the two of them are playing.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
The AO is Djokovic's best surface, but that doesn't mean it favors his matchup with Nadal. The match isn't entirely in Djokovic's hands. Nadal can take the match out of Djokovic's hands if this matchup on this particular hardcourt favors Nadal. They haven't played here before.

This is by far Djokovic's best major and by far Nadal's worst. Unless Novak loses focus (again) as he did in the Wimbledon and US finals, Rafa won't win more than 3 games per set.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
Novak-Djokovic-The-Super-Tennis-Star-19.jpg
 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
SPOILER ALERT (if you haven't seen the Haasdal match yet):










I think Nadal dodged a bit of a bullet today, not as far as winning goes, but as far as dropping a set. Haas was good enough to take a set and is one of the few players who matchup decently with Nadal on a tactical level. Haas still needed some more matchplay though to really get the most out of his game. Very good results for Nadal, 3 sets and a lot quicker than it could have been. And an easy round 3 coming up I think.

A one handed backhander like Haas has no chance against the great Nadal.
 
This is by far Djokovic's best major and by far Nadal's worst. Unless Novak loses focus (again) as he did in the Wimbledon and US finals, Rafa won't win more than 3 games per set.

Nah, tennis doesn't work like that. Every match-up is completely unique. The surfaces in each specific match-up effect the match-up in different ways. For example, Djokovic needed a 3rd set tie-breaker to beat Nadal at Miami (and needed a deciding set to beat Nadal at Indian Wells) but beat Nadal in straight sets on clay at Rome and Madrid. Then they met at Wimbledon and Nadal breadsticked Djokovic. Djokovic won the match, but it had back-n-forth breaks. All this defies the fact that Nadal's best surface is clay.

Someone watching these matches would have presumed that Djokovic's best surface was clay, and Nadal's worst surface was clay. And it's true that at the moment, in this match-up Djokovic has more time on clay to take charge of the point against Nadal. Also, Nadal's serve is more vulnerable on clay. Whereas when Nadal plays other guys on clay, they are hurt by Nadal's topspin and are unable to flatten-out the high-bouncing/spinning ball, unlike Djokovic.

This current surface dynamic wasn't always the case, as Djokovic wasn't always confident enough to take Nadal's high balls on the rise on clay. So Djokovic in the past wasn't as competitive on clay vs Nadal. Meanwhile, in the past Nadal wasn't as good on hardcourts compared to today. So even within the surface variables within a match-up you have timeline variables concerning the players development on each surface.
 
A one handed backhander like Haas has no chance against the great Nadal.

Haas' backhand actually has a lot of kick on it, unlike Federer's. Not saying Haas' backhand is a weapon vs Nadal, it just isn't the liability that we sometimes see when Federer plays Nadal. Of course, Haas has been lacking match practice, so nothing in his game was at prime level. But his backhand did pin Nadal back further than most one-handed backhands tend to.
 

Lawn Tennis

Semi-Pro
People, people! Why are we posting this here. ESPN3.com allows us the ability to watch every single match the day after, and now you've spoiled it for a lot of us!

Can the mods move this to "Pro Match Results"? I know it doesn't say Nadal won his first or second round match, but saying that Nadal looks unstoppable kinda gives it away.
 

Fedex

Legend
People, people! Why are we posting this here. ESPN3.com allows us the ability to watch every single match the day after, and now you've spoiled it for a lot of us!

Can the mods move this to "Pro Match Results"? I know it doesn't say Nadal won his first or second round match, but saying that Nadal looks unstoppable kinda gives it away.

I think if you visit a tennis forum it will be nigh on impossible to avoid the results.
Stay well clear until you've seen the match.
It's the only sure way I'm afraid.
 
C

celoft

Guest
This is by far Djokovic's best major and by far Nadal's worst. Unless Novak loses focus (again) as he did in the Wimbledon and US finals, Rafa won't win more than 3 games per set.

I concur.

There was no Djokovic 2.0 in 2010 and that is why Nadal won 3 slams by not necessarily playing GOAT tennis, he was better in 2008/early 2009.

Djokovic 2.0 is like an upgraded and improved version of Nadal which means Djokovic 2.0 is a better player than Nadal. It's like Murray is a better version of Simon, hence the owning.

Nadal playing at the same level of 2010 that won him 3 slams is not enough to beat Djokovic 2.0 who does everything Nadal does better. Plus Nadal has no variety or surprise tactics to trouble Djokovic 2.0 like Federer and Murray can.
 
I concur.

There was no Djokovic 2.0 in 2010 and that is why Nadal won 3 slams by not necessarily playing GOAT tennis, he was better in 2008/early 2009.

Djokovic 2.0 is like an upgraded and improved version of Nadal which means Djokovic 2.0 is a better player than Nadal. It's like Murray is a better version of Simon, hence the owning.

Nadal playing at the same level of 2010 that won him 3 slams is not enough to beat Djokovic 2.0 who does everything Nadal does better. Plus Nadal has no variety or surprise tactics to trouble Djokovic 2.0 like Federer and Murray can.

Last year, Nadal breadsticked Djokovic at Wimbledon, won a set at the US Open (and had 2-0 leads in 2 other sets), and earlier in the year lost in a tight tie-breaker 3rd set at Miami. Clearly, Nadal can reach the level to get on top of Djokovic, just not for long. Nadal must keep the level up for longer, and he can. And as I said earlier in the thread, don't assume that Djokovic's best surface vs Nadal is the same as his best surface vs other players. Anyone watching Nadal vs Djokovic in 2011 would have assumed clay was Nadal's worst surface (and Djokovic's best surface)-

Every match-up is completely unique. The surfaces in each specific match-up effect the match-up in different ways. For example, Djokovic needed a 3rd set tie-breaker to beat Nadal at Miami (and needed a deciding set to beat Nadal at Indian Wells) but beat Nadal in straight sets on clay at Rome and Madrid. Then they met at Wimbledon and Nadal breadsticked Djokovic. Djokovic won the match, but it had back-n-forth breaks. All this defies the fact that Nadal's best surface is clay.

Someone watching these matches would have presumed that Djokovic's best surface was clay, and Nadal's worst surface was clay. And it's true that at the moment, in this match-up Djokovic has more time on clay to take charge of the point against Nadal. Also, Nadal's serve is more vulnerable on clay. Whereas when Nadal plays other guys on clay, they are hurt by Nadal's topspin and are unable to flatten-out the high-bouncing/spinning ball, unlike Djokovic.

This current surface dynamic wasn't always the case, as Djokovic wasn't always confident enough to take Nadal's high balls on the rise on clay. So Djokovic in the past wasn't as competitive on clay vs Nadal. Meanwhile, in the past Nadal wasn't as good on hardcourts compared to today. So even within the surface variables within a match-up you have timeline variables concerning the players development on each surface.
 

swordtennis

G.O.A.T.
lmao @ epic NadFans.
Backing main Man Djokovic.
The Machine.
This Brah can do everything.
Text book strokes.
Nadal has gimmicky strokes its apparent.
Nadal is pumped and gearing up for another peak year, retards.
If Djokovic can stop him again he is EPIC.
 

Mike Sams

G.O.A.T.
lmao @ epic NadFans.
Backing main Man Djokovic.
The Machine.
This Brah can do everything.
Text book strokes.
Nadal has gimmicky strokes its apparent.
Nadal is pumped and gearing up for another peak year, retards.
If Djokovic can stop him again he is EPIC.

Uhm...don't you mean if Nadal can stop Djokovic? Last I checked, it's Djokovic handing out breadsticks and bagels throughout the tour while being far and away the world #1 whereas Nadal is needing an MRI to see if his knee is cracked just from sitting on a chair. :lol:
 

swordtennis

G.O.A.T.
Uhm...don't you mean if Nadal can stop Djokovic? Last I checked, it's Djokovic handing out breadsticks and bagels throughout the tour while being far and away the world #1 whereas Nadal is needing an MRI to see if his knee is cracked just from sitting on a chair. :lol:

lol did not think of it the other way around.
Gotta give Nadal props for his achievements and GS experience.
More than Djokovic at this point.
This injury thing has been going on since Nadal came on tour lol.
He is always running around like a jackrabbit tho never tiring.
I want to see Djokovic beat Nadal again at a GS that will solidify his #1.
 

ultradr

Legend
Nadal, with questionable state of his knee and shoulder, and off-court
distractions with ATP tour and Federer, would need supreme concentration
to win AO. I mean excluding question on whether he will be able to beat
Djokovic ever again.
 
Djokovic is pretty much doomed if Nadal wins this AO. All the people who diss Nadal to death will be doomed too :oops::oops::oops: and threads will be bumped like crazy :shock:
 

Magnus

Legend
If Nadal wins more than 1 slam this year, he WILL break Federer's record. He will be too close to let it run away. Fed needs to put some more effort and make the gap larger, otherwise Nadal will catch him.
 

Clarky21

Banned
If Nadal wins more than 1 slam this year, he WILL break Federer's record. He will be too close to let it run away. Fed needs to put some more effort and make the gap larger, otherwise Nadal will catch him.


Nadal will not win one slam this year much less multiple slams. Fed's slam count is safe and sound at least where Nadal is concerned.
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
If Nadal wins more than 1 slam this year, he WILL break Federer's record. He will be too close to let it run away. Fed needs to put some more effort and make the gap larger, otherwise Nadal will catch him.
Noel is putting in the effort. Don't worry.

But we just have to be careful that Noel doesn't win all 4 slams in a year or he'll overshadow Rafa's greatness.
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
Last year, Nadal breadsticked Djokovic at Wimbledon, won a set at the US Open (and had 2-0 leads in 2 other sets), and earlier in the year lost in a tight tie-breaker 3rd set at Miami. -
Clearly, Nadal had a phenomenal 2011, towering over his competitors.

Clearly, and without any doubt he has AO in his suitcase.
 
Top