jackson vile
G.O.A.T.
Novak is as close to perfection as any player can get, he can defeat all of the greats on their best surfaces, not like pretend perfect Federer.
Novak is as close to perfection as any player can get, he can defeat all of the greats on their best surfaces, not like pretend perfect Federer.
Djokovic beat Federer on grass? When did that happen?
Forgot, Federer couldn't make it. Not like his best surface is grass anyways, Nadal proved that.
I miss nadalwon2012
I miss nadal_freak.
I miss your point.
Federer couldn't make once as opposed to the four times Djokovic didn't make it. So Federer lost to Nadal on grass once and it's not his best surface anymore? Is Soderling a better clay courter than Nadal?
Does Soderling have a FO title?
Federer couldn't make once as opposed to the four times Djokovic didn't make it. So Federer lost to Nadal on grass once and it's not his best surface anymore? Is Soderling a better clay courter than Nadal?
I miss 90's music.
I miss the old Levis orange tab
OMG. talking sense into Hatefedvile...
How to deal with Jacksondrokvile lesson one:
try posting about World finance, Yorkshire puddings or Special Olimpics and see Jacksondorkvile twist it into some "omg ****s this, delusional ****s that dso dense... feders is done, dusted and worthless"
I miss little sunshine.
I miss your point.
ay mis hijos...
I miss she-hoes.
I MISS BAR MILK..BTW HOWS SPAIN?? DID U MEET RAFA??ok... we havd our share of fun here... now lets get back on topic...
i kid... one more for the road!
i miss take
It's an interesting question, considering these 2 facts:
a) Nadal has only lost 1 match at Roland Garros.
b) Djokovic has never beaten Federer at Roland Garros.
2012 is not 2007, when only nadal played well.
federer doesn't own slams. besides that, he is not the only threat to djoker.
just because federer played 2 error-filled matches by Weak djoker doesn't mean federer was the only fighter worth mentioning in slams vs. djoker.
djoker wasn't comfortable with the media and crowd at the french open and had an injury in september
AND october.
2012 is not 2007, when only nadal played well.
federer doesn't own slams. besides that, he is not the only threat to djoker.
just because federer played 2 error-filled matches by Weak djoker doesn't mean federer was the only fighter worth mentioning in slams vs. djoker.
djoker wasn't comfortable with the media and crowd at the french open and had an injury in september
AND october.
Alright, so I think we can all come to the unanimous conclusion that this guy doesn't even watch tennis.
I am sure you can sense his presence.
Devila just posts random stuff that makes no sense. He's going on about 2 matches where Djokovic played bad (he lost only one to Federer so wtf?) then him not being comfortable with press, then injuries that were later in the year and had nothing to do with RG. He's best totally ignored. In fact after a few times respoding to him i stopped and noticed most of the time he posts something and no-one even looks up. Totally ignored. It makes me laugh.
Hey dude, I made a Birthday thread just for you. Did you like the pics ?I MISS BAR MILK..BTW HOWS SPAIN?? DID U MEET RAFA??
Joker wil definitely win RG and have 4inaro.
Hey dude, I made a Birthday thread just for you. Did you like the pics ?
Ignorance is, for exampe, when you accuse someone of something without proof. You accused me of ignorance regarding our discussion what is the definition of "Grand Slam" without producing a proof."Ignorance is the mother of hapiness"
Do either Djokovic or Nadal have 6 Wimbledon titles?
And what does that have anything to do with Novak being a more perfect player than Federer and being able to defeat both Nadal and Federer in the same tournament all in a row?
Novak is far more likely than Federer to complete the True Grand Slam, no reason to get butt hurt over it.
Now if Federer was still playing against Safin, Hewitt, and Roddick he would have been able to accomplish it at some point. It was much easier then.
And what does that have anything to do with Novak being a more perfect player than Federer and being able to defeat both Nadal and Federer in the same tournament all in a row?
Novak is far more likely than Federer to complete the True Grand Slam, no reason to get butt hurt over it.
Now if Federer was still playing against Safin, Hewitt, and Roddick he would have been able to accomplish it at some point. It was much easier then.
It would seem that you've lost track of what we were discussing. No surprise, however. You said that Nadal proved that grass no longer suited Federer. Explain that statement.
Never said that, I said that grass was not Federer's best surface which it never was even after they slowed it down for him. Wim. was slowed down back in 2001.
If anything HC are Federer's best surface and Novak proved at a very early age that he could kick everyone *** there.
Novak is far more perfect and there for far more likely to make the GS. We just have a lot of Federer fans that are haters, if this were a Federer vote the percentage would be in the 80% range.
As there is no perfect player out there, the concept of a "most perfect player" must be created by a 12 year old
As there is no perfect player out there, the concept of a "most perfect player" must be created by a 12 year old
Never said that, I said that grass was not Federer's best surface which it never was even after they slowed it down for him. Wim. was slowed down back in 2001.
If anything HC are Federer's best surface and Novak proved at a very early age that he could kick everyone *** there.
Novak is far more perfect and there for far more likely to make the GS. We just have a lot of Federer fans that are haters, if this were a Federer vote the percentage would be in the 80% range.
What's next? Djokovic beats Federer on clay, therefore it's Federer's best surface?
Let's do this instead, why do you believe that grass is Federer's best surface? I could be wrong, let's look at the numbers and if the numbers prove otherwise I will graciously concede.
Wow, more denial as almost all Federer fans claimed that he was 100% perfect. Most perfect is a concept, too bad you thinking is little to understand it.
6 Wimbledon titles out of 7 consecutive finals, plus it's the only slam where he's beaten Nadal. Yeah, he has 9 HC slam titles, but there are two HC slams a year per grass slam. If Federer were as dominant on hard as he was on grass, he would have 12 HC slams.
So what you are saying is that we should ignore the total number of titles? I mean 9>6 right, does quality or quantity matter most? Certainly just because he has lost to Nadal more times at HC slams does not mean he is a lesser HC player?
Obviously you didn't even read my post.
Wimbledon-US Open: 6>5
Wimbledon-Australian Open: 6>4
No one but you is ignoring total number of titles. You're the one trying to argue that Novak is a better grass-court player than Federer, despite having far less titles on the surface.
Never said any of that, you are making up more lies. I said that Novak is far more capable and likely to make a CYGS than Federer ever was. Novak can defeat all players on all surfaces, while Federer could not.
16>10 right?
Novak is as close to perfection as any player can get, he can defeat all of the greats on their best surfaces, not like pretend perfect Federer.
You said he can beat all of the greats on their best surface, did you not? So, when grass is clearly Federer's preferred surface and Djokovic has yet to beat him there, how can you claim that?
Com'on, really? Numbers don't lie remember 16>10 right?
Com'on, really? Numbers don't lie remember 16>10 right?