ESPN: Is Federer the Greatest Athlete?

Feather

Legend
I agree, a player should only compare to his own sport.

The clear consensus about the greatest player in their sport:

NFL - Jerry Rice
NBA - Michael Jordan
NHL - Wayne Gretzky
Tennis - Roger Federer
Soccer - Pele
MLB - Babe Ruth(although I don't agree he's the best player)

There is no clear consensus about Pele greater than Diego Maradona..
 

Alchemy-Z

Hall of Fame
Jordan was still giving Kobe problems when he was much older.

Lead one of the most dominate Olympic teams in history to gold.

he is the bench mark..

I remember when it was "tiger woods is the Jordan of Golf"

he had his own style that is so iconic that the logo of him dunking is still one of the most popular of any sport.
 

spaceman_spiff

Hall of Fame
I'm just saying that Federer failed his first important hurdle - 2006 French Open final. That's something that never happened to Jim Thorpe, Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan, Michael Phelps.

Jim Thorpe was the most dominant athlete ever, look him up. Nobody else is really close.

Jim Thorpe for the win. National championship in college football, two gold medals in the summer olympics, several years in MLB and NFL, and even a bit of professional basketball thrown in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Thorpe
 
Jim Thorpe for the win. National championship in college football, two gold medals in the summer olympics, several years in MLB and NFL, and even a bit of professional basketball thrown in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Thorpe

baseball, american football and backetball, says it all really (except basketball those 2 other sports are played in USA and almost nowhere else, at that time they were probably played only in USA and Canada) so you can cut him out of the discussion.




Funny how Americans come with some unknown player of theirs, a sportsman cannot be dominant if it is known in 2-3 countries.
 

TeflonTom

Banned
I don't care who has the best boxing technique, just like I don't care if a 5'0" tall guy has the best tennis technique. I care who the best boxers and tennis players are. Size and muscularity are factors in athleticism and sports.

That's like having height classes in basketball.
then u miss the point of boxing entirely

boxing n other martial arts are about skill. in combat sports more than any other, size advantage negates the fair evaluation of that skill. that is the reason for weight divisions

if all u care about is who can beat the **** out of whom, u aint a boxin fan. ur a brawlin fan.
 

spaceman_spiff

Hall of Fame
baseball, american football and backetball, says it all really (except basketball those 2 other sports are played in USA and almost nowhere else, at that time they were probably played only in USA and Canada) so you can cut him out of the discussion.




Funny how Americans come with some unknown player of theirs, a sportsman cannot be dominant if it is known in 2-3 countries.

In the 1912 Olympics he won the pentathalon and decathalon, with a decathalon points record that lasted for over 20 years. During the medals ceremony, it is reported that King Gustav told Thorpe that he was the greatest athlete in the world.

So, he had the hand-eye coordination to play baseball, the strength and speed to play in the NFL, he played a bit of professional basketball, he won two gold medals in all-around competitions (wearing someone else's discarded shoes after his had been stolen), and he even won a national university championship in ballroom dancing.

Show me a European/South American footballer or a tennis player who can win medals in the decathalon and I might agree with you. Until then, Jim Thorpe gets my vote.
 
Last edited:

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
In the 1912 Olympics he won the pentathalon and decathalon, with a decathalon points record that lasted for over 20 years. During the medals ceremony, it is reported that King Gustav told Thorpe that he was the greatest athlete in the world.
Close, but it was "...world's greatest athlete."

Thorpe apparently replied to him with "Thanks King." :lol:
 
Soccer is correctly called Football (you use your FOOT to kick a BALL)

American Football should be called "Hand Egg" for obvious reasons.

=)
 

Devilito

Hall of Fame
Of course not, tennis players are a joke, athletically.

Even Nadal is an utter joke, the average football player would double his physical stats and probably weigh two Nadal's (all muscle, of course) as well.

i'd LOOOOOOOVE to see a huge muscular football player play 5 hour best 3-5 set matches with 1 day break and tournaments YEAR ROUND over a career that can span 15 years, the footwork and movement and flexibility required, skill, mental toughness over long matches without team mates or coaches and the constant variation in play and point construction. LMAO ok. After 6 months the football player wouldn’t have won a single match because he’s way to big and would run out of gas after 30 minutes on court. They would be injured to hell and back due to the strain of tennis on such a physical build, they would have burnt out mentally and have to retire. Football players play football, basketball players play basketball and tennis players play tennis. Their builds and fitness and athleticism are optimized for their respective sports and nothing else. Grab Djokovic and bulk him up to 240lbs and train him like a football player and he wouldn’t win another tennis match in his life.
 

WhiskeyEE

G.O.A.T.
then u miss the point of boxing entirely

boxing n other martial arts are about skill. in combat sports more than any other, size advantage negates the fair evaluation of that skill. that is the reason for weight divisions

if all u care about is who can beat the **** out of whom, u aint a boxin fan. ur a brawlin fan.

Size negates the fair evaluation of skill in every sport. That isn't unique to boxing.
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
There is no clear consensus about Pele greater than Diego Maradona..

You maybe right...I'm not a huge soccer fan as other sports. Back then my dad use to talk highly of Pele so that's why I got influenced by him.:)
 
Diego Maradona took Argentina single handedly to a World cup win (1986)and a world cup final(1990). That's not the case with Pele.

The 1970 Brazil team is the best team of all time and Pele still stood head above his team mates. He's far better than Maradona.
 

JustBob

Hall of Fame
In the 1912 Olympics he won the pentathalon and decathalon, with a decathalon points record that lasted for over 20 years. During the medals ceremony, it is reported that King Gustav told Thorpe that he was the greatest athlete in the world.

So, he had the hand-eye coordination to play baseball, the strength and speed to play in the NFL, he played a bit of professional basketball, he won two gold medals in all-around competitions (wearing someone else's discarded shoes after his had been stolen), and he even won a national university championship in ballroom dancing.

Show me a European/South American footballer or a tennis player who can win medals in the decathalon and I might agree with you. Until then, Jim Thorpe gets my vote.

Jim Thorpe is arguably the greatest all around athlete of all time. What that shows is versatility, not complete and utter dominance in a single sport. While Thorpe's achievements are impressive, they would be impossible to duplicate today because sports have become so specialized.
 

JustBob

Hall of Fame
You would think ESPN would know better.

Ali is the most well known boxer of all time, not the greatest.

Perhaps, but one could argue that the definition of "greatest" is not limited to mere stats and accomplishments in the sport, and that "greatest" also includes popularity and more importantly, being able to transcend your sport and become an iconic cultural figure. Not to mention the impact on the (future of) sport itself.
 

TERRASTAR18

Hall of Fame
Says who? Don't like facts? Whipe your tears.

what facts?
Nicklaus is the greatest golfer, not Woods.- wrong in most stats, tw is ahead or on pace.
Eddie Merckx is the greatest cyclist, not Armstrong.- 7 tour de frances, gold medal.
Gretzky is the best in terms of accomplishments but Mario Lemieux was more skilled.-mario(a bigger player can inferior stats in every category compared to gretz).

And comparing team sports to individual sports is a bit silly.- greatness is greatness.
 

WhiskeyEE

G.O.A.T.
no it doesnt

difference between size bein an advantage n size bein definin factor

you aint know ***** bout boxin brah. philistines like u give the sport a bad rap

Oh shut the **** up you pansy. Size is no more a defining factor in boxing than it is in many other sports. How many average to below average height guys are there in the NBA?

Size is a factor in boxing and athletics in general. Weight classes merely allow inferior athletes to compete. Deal with it.
 
Last edited:

TeflonTom

Banned
u make a compellin argument :rolleyes:

Like i said dood, u a brawlin fan, not a boxin fan

marquis o queensberry be rollin in his grave if he heard the ***** u be spoutin
 

JustBob

Hall of Fame
what facts?
Nicklaus is the greatest golfer, not Woods.- wrong in most stats, tw is ahead or on pace.
Eddie Merckx is the greatest cyclist, not Armstrong.- 7 tour de frances, gold medal.
Gretzky is the best in terms of accomplishments but Mario Lemieux was more skilled.-mario(a bigger player can inferior stats in every category compared to gretz).

And comparing team sports to individual sports is a bit silly.- greatness is greatness.

Here's a hint, if you're gonna use stats, don't pick and choose which one(s) better suit your opinion and ignore all others. For example, Armstrong's resume/stats pale in comparison to what Merckx has achieved. Look it up.

And comparing individual sports with team sports is silly. One might have the benefit of playing for a good/great team his whole carreer while another might not.
 

hersito

Rookie
only if ur argentinian or a napoli fan

most ppl put him third behind pele n beckenbaur

In which parallel universe that happens? The only place where they think that pele is better than Maradona is in the USA probably Japan and Brasil itself, and even most brasilians know that Maradona is better (look for interviews of their players like ronaldinho). Pele is FIFAs and Mastercard face and that's why he was marketed all around the world, he wouldn't have done a thing against 80 and 90 defenses as I said before. Not for nothing he was never bought by any team.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
Perhaps, but one could argue that the definition of "greatest" is not limited to mere stats and accomplishments in the sport, and that "greatest" also includes popularity and more importantly, being able to transcend your sport and become an iconic cultural figure. Not to mention the impact on the (future of) sport itself.

Yep Ali transcended the norms of morality and became a champion of segregation. True great. /sarcasm
 

BauerAlmeida

Hall of Fame
In which parallel universe that happens? The only place where they think that pele is better than Maradona is in the USA probably Japan and Brasil itself, and even most brasilians know that Maradona is better (look for interviews of their players like ronaldinho). Pele is FIFAs and Mastercard face and that's why he was marketed all around the world, he wouldn't have done a thing against 80 and 90 defenses as I said before. Not for nothing he was never bought by any team.


Maradona is the football GOAT for sure.

Pele was a great football player but I don't see any reasons to believe he is better (maybe he wasn't worse either) than Cruyff, Zidane, Messi, Beckenbauer, Platini, and a lot of other legends.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
In which parallel universe that happens? The only place where they think that pele is better than Maradona is in the USA probably Japan and Brasil itself, and even most brasilians know that Maradona is better (look for interviews of their players like ronaldinho). Pele is FIFAs and Mastercard face and that's why he was marketed all around the world, he wouldn't have done a thing against 80 and 90 defenses as I said before. Not for nothing he was never bought by any team.

Oh oh oh.. you said it then. LOL! I suggest to you to look up the Adidas vs Puma story to learn what Pele meant to the sport (if mere statistics don't work).

But just in case you decide one day to look at achievements instead of hyperbole (your own)

World Cup winner 1958, 1962, 1970

FIFA Player of the Century : 2000

Football Player of the Century, elected by France Football's Golden Ball Winners : 1999
Football Player of the Century, by IFFHS International Federation of Football History and Statistics: 1999
South America Football Player of the Century, by IFFHS International Federation of Football History and Statistics: 1999


99 appearances
77 goals for the national team

12 goals and provided 8 assists in 14 World Cup appearances

Total 1282 goals in 1366 matches.

========

As for Maradona:

8 goals and made 8 assists in 21 World Cup appearances

World Cup: Winner: 1986

91 appearances
34 goals for the national team

311 goals in a total of 590 matches.


To use your words, only in a parallel universe one would consider Maradona better than Pele.

Asked recently if he thought Messi could become better than him Pele answered something along the lines of: "has he won 3 World Cups yet?" then he was asked when the next Pele would come along and he said: "my parents closed the factory years ago".

No debate here, now you know.
 

Magnetite

Professional
You can't really compare sports like that. It doesn't make any sense. Especially when some are individual and others are team sports. It's actually quite stupid.
 
Maradona is not even the greatest football player ever. Not to mention he has repeatedly taking drugs to enhance his performance. Ultimately he did not achieve as much as Pele and was arguably an inferior player.

I don't see how it's harder to become a legend in football than tennis. If anything it is easier, since there are more positions. Where as in tennis it's like they all play in the same position.

You mean performance enhancing drugs like cocaine?:D

I think federer is one of the greatest but he simply didn't reach the level of dominance that ruth or jordan had.

federer had a peer with nadal that was about at the same level as him (maybe a little lower if you adjust for the surfaces).

but ruth and jordan had no one who was even close. to me ruth is the greatest ever. you could argue about phelps and bolt being ahead of fed too.

still fed is a really great of course.
 

TERRASTAR18

Hall of Fame
Here's a hint, if you're gonna use stats, don't pick and choose which one(s) better suit your opinion and ignore all others. For example, Armstrong's resume/stats pale in comparison to what Merckx has achieved. Look it up.

And comparing individual sports with team sports is silly. One might have the benefit of playing for a good/great team his whole carreer while another might not.

the tour de france is the most prestigous event, meryck has five, lance has 7....giros and vueltas are great, but the tour is like the super bowl.
 

TeflonTom

Banned
the tour de france is the most prestigous event, meryck has five, lance has 7....giros and vueltas are great, but the tour is like the super bowl.
u kno nothin bout cyclin then

tour is great but merckx won everythin there is to win in cyclin. giros, vueltas, tours, classics

merckx coulda won a bunch more tours if he'd concentrated on em to the exclusion of everythin else like fancy pants lance. but it wasnt as important back in the 70s
 

BauerAlmeida

Hall of Fame
Oh oh oh.. you said it then. LOL! I suggest to you to look up the Adidas vs Puma story to learn what Pele meant to the sport (if mere statistics don't work).

But just in case you decide one day to look at achievements instead of hyperbole (your own)

World Cup winner 1958, 1962, 1970

FIFA Player of the Century : 2000

Football Player of the Century, elected by France Football's Golden Ball Winners : 1999
Football Player of the Century, by IFFHS International Federation of Football History and Statistics: 1999
South America Football Player of the Century, by IFFHS International Federation of Football History and Statistics: 1999


99 appearances
77 goals for the national team

12 goals and provided 8 assists in 14 World Cup appearances

Total 1282 goals in 1366 matches.

========

As for Maradona:

8 goals and made 8 assists in 21 World Cup appearances

World Cup: Winner: 1986

91 appearances
34 goals for the national team

311 goals in a total of 590 matches.


To use your words, only in a parallel universe one would consider Maradona better than Pele.

Asked recently if he thought Messi could become better than him Pele answered something along the lines of: "has he won 3 World Cups yet?" then he was asked when the next Pele would come along and he said: "my parents closed the factory years ago".

No debate here, now you know.

-Maradona is NOT a striker, it doesn't matter how many goals he scored.
-Pele played in a decade where teams played 2-3-5 (formation), do you see that today?? And the level wasn't as competitive as it is now
-NEVER played outside Brasil (except one season in.......USA)
-In one of the 3 WC Brasil won, Pele barely played.
-Football is a team sport, Messi may not win 3 WC but he is scoring 50 goals per season. Pele wouldn't even dream about doing that this times. Last season Messi scored MORE THAN 70 GOALS, that's outrageous, nobody will ever come close to that.
 
Top