Which Male player had the biggest Forehand ever?

hawk eye

Hall of Fame
Best and biggest FH had Sampras. He could really hit laserbeams. Especially after hitting his running FH, opponent looked like "where on earth did that come from'.
Fed 's FH is big and versatile, but al level below. His running FH was always pretty average.
Gonzo's FH might be as big as Sampras, but also not that good on the run and he had too large a backswing en needed a long time to set up.
Same goes for Delpo.
Berdych has the smoothest, most effortless stroke of all but it's not consinstent enough and though verý fast, it's not the biggest.
 
What is this stupid question OP
Monfis has the biggest forehand ever recorded
Obviously you asked the only questions about a forehand that the name of federer wont appear
Best forehand ever federer . its not about the speed , accuracy and consistency
 

The-Champ

Legend
Federer on forehands after his loss to DelPotro 2009.

http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=59173
Q. Could you talk about his forehand, just talk about it and how it compares to other big forehands on the tour.

ROGER FEDERER: Well, it's different. I guess he hits it well on the forehand side. The inside-out is good, too. But I mean, there are some better ones out there. He definitely strikes it with great pace and good margin, too. Sometimes he hits crazy ones, too, but that's what happens when you go for it a lot. He has a great technique at backhand. Rock solid.

Q. The other ones, you've spoken highly of González's forehand. Who are the others, the better ones?

ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, his is different. I don't know if I could put it up to González and Blake and Nadal. He's got a very good forehand, but I don't know if it's the best in the world right now. I don't think so. But it doesn't matter. He won the match, right? Doesn't matter if you have a great backhand or forehand.
 

Feña14

G.O.A.T.
What is this stupid question OP
Monfis has the biggest forehand ever recorded
Obviously you asked the only questions about a forehand that the name of federer wont appear
Best forehand ever federer . its not about the speed , accuracy and consistency

Blake and Murray have had them recorded quicker than Monfils.
 
What does 'big' mean?

With groundstrokes, you either put more effort into swinging horizontally (for mph), or swinging vertically (for rpm).

Berdych isn't the strongest or most explosive guy, but his forehand is fast, because there is so little spin on it.

The guy with the biggest forehand is the guy who accelerates the racket head the fastest.

Think of it like this - if all the pro's had a competition to see who could slam their racket into a metal pole the hardest - the winner of this competition would be the one with the biggest forehand.
 

President

Legend
What does 'big' mean?

With groundstrokes, you either put more effort into swinging horizontally (for mph), or swinging vertically (for rpm).

Berdych isn't the strongest or most explosive guy, but his forehand is fast, because there is so little spin on it.

The guy with the biggest forehand is the guy who accelerates the racket head the fastest.

Think of it like this - if all the pro's had a competition to see who could slam their racket into a metal pole the hardest - the winner of this competition would be the one with the biggest forehand.

Igor Andreev, Fernando Gonzales, or Nadal would win.
 
Fed is up there. gonzos FH was also huge.

Fernando Gonzalez

It's hard to tell, because those forehands that visually do not look as fast, may actually be loaded with heavy spin, thus making them very hard to return.

Soderling just looks like a gormless ogre clubbing the **** out of the ball. I think he and Gonzo are strong candidates.

Agreed, best that I've personally seen keeping in mind that I haven't been watching tennis for as long as some people here

I second this

Fernando Gonzales for having massive pace as well as the ability to put huge spin on the ball. Andreev's is lethal as well.

The most I liked was Fernando Gonzalez, could think in many others but Fernando's killer shot was fantastic.

ABBA's hero:
Fernando

Fernando Gonzalez ...

Not sure it was the biggest but if I could have one it'd be Gonzo's.

2007 AO Fernando Gonzales is probably best forehand exhibition, along with Del Potro's 2009 US Open run (especially the final)

Fernando Gonzalez

Currently it's DelPo

Fernando Gonzalez. Just an amazing player overall considering how much he could do playing 80% of the court with his FH and defending his BH by running around it so much. I saw him live, I have seen a lot of players live but Gonzo's FH was like a laser beam.

Gonzalez FH was nuclear, loved watching him play, too bad his injuries got the better of him.

Gonzo #1
Soderling #2
Safin #3

At it's peak, Fernando Gonzalez's maybe.

Yup. Huge forehand.

yup just quoting up to the third page. That savage forehand will surely be missed.
 

THE FIGHTER

Hall of Fame
What does 'big' mean?

With groundstrokes, you either put more effort into swinging horizontally (for mph), or swinging vertically (for rpm).

Berdych isn't the strongest or most explosive guy, but his forehand is fast, because there is so little spin on it.

The guy with the biggest forehand is the guy who accelerates the racket head the fastest.

Think of it like this - if all the pro's had a competition to see who could slam their racket into a metal pole the hardest - the winner of this competition would be the one with the biggest forehand.

guys who focus on rpm aren't necessarily going to win your who could smash their racquet on a metal pole the hardest competition. Their RPM-mentality-driven technique wont help them in this situation because a more vertical stroke doesn't allow for the maximum force on the racquet upon contact with the pole.



with a more upward/ brushy stroke, the racquet's force isnt being applied directly onto the pole, but instead at an offset. even after contact, the racquet has a higher chance of being deflected because of the upward motion. on the other hand, a flat forehand would make contact with the pole a lot more bluntly, with more direct force being applied to the pole and less chance of deflection.

now, this is considering that players would hit the pole with the same stroke as their forehand. if that isnt a requirement and players are allowed to hit with a more ideal racquet breaking stroke for this contest, then the whole argument you provided with rpm vs mph relative to racquet head speed and swing path can be thrown out of the window.




the argument of best forehand has to be a combination of both RHS and what the ball does after it leaves the racquet, not just RHS.


with that said, vamos nads.
 
Top