Lack of touch shots? Fed?
Yes, zagor, you have read rightly.
Lack of touch shots? Fed?
federer has a clearly better volley than borg ... borg was just helped at a lot at wimbledon by the ball just dying on his stop volleys ...the same thing @ flushing got punished quite a bit ....
lack of touch shots ? lack of touch shots ??????????????????
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
ok, I can't stop laughing .......... will someone please help me ...........
lack of versatility ??????????????
yeah, right ???????? rod laver was an insane fellow to say federer could do anything on a tennis court ............. I mean what does he know about tennis
pc1,
this is a guy you think has knowledge of tennis ?????? now, seriously ?
krosero
I know you are too polite and nice and all ....... but honestly, to me, BobbyOne seems a lost cause ......
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Federer_career_statistics#Head.E2.80.93to.E2.80.93head_vs._top-20_ranked_players
Yep, Federer's record against the top players is so bad...
NatF, Yes Roger's record against the top players is not great since Nadal, Djokovic and Murray have reached their peak.
He has a leading h2h with Djokovic, leads Nadal off clay and has a slightly negative head to head with Murray who's peak was actually 2012, Federer won 3 of their 5 meetings in 2012.
Federer has also declined since they got better. The fact you're too thick headed to accept that their better head to heads are also contributed to by Federer's marked decline doesn't help your cause.
Murray reached his peak only in the second half of 2012.
Federer declines at 29? A bit too early for a GOAT candidate....
Murray reached his peak only in the second half of 2012.
Oh my, isn't that convenient.
So he wasn't at his peak when Fed beat him in Wimbledon final but was at his peak 2 weeks later in the Olympics final, how very interesting.
Tell me, is Murray's peak level much better than Fed's as well? I personally think he should rank higher than Fed on your official peak play + longevity list now, time to update it.
Federer had several years without strong Nadal, Djokovic, Agassi, Murray, del Potro...
abmk, Your arrogance is world class.
Federer could do anything on a tennis court. It's just a pity that he did not show it too often against top players, especially within of the last three years.
Hardly a GOAT candidate...
Murraya and Del Potro being clearly inferior to Gerulatis and Tanner as far as record has kept on proving.I´d say their are like Mecir and Korda.
Murray reached his peak when it works for your argument? You're a biased old fool. Put Rosewall at 29 in this era and he'd be squashed by the likes of Djokovic, Murray and Nadal. At the top of the game even a small decline can mean the difference between winning close matches and losing them.
Length of a career is only one criterion for a GOAT anyway. Besides that Federer is still competed and is currently holding Wimbledon, you know, the most prestigious tennis trophy of them all? The one Rosewall never won...
Is this an example of why kids should stay off drugs?
You make it pretty clear that you know nothing about Federer.
Murraya and Del Potro being clearly inferior to Gerulatis and Tanner as far as record has kept on proving.I´d say their are like Mecir and Korda.
Oh my, isn't that convenient.
So he wasn't at his peak when Fed beat him in Wimbledon final but was at his peak 2 weeks later in the Olympics final, how very interesting.
Tell me, is Murray's peak level much better than Fed's as well? I personally think he should rank higher than Fed on your official peak play + longevity list now, time to update it.
I'm disappointed that the Federer fanatics not only dominate the General PP Discussion but partly also the Former PP Talk where one could have expected the posters do know about tennis history.....
zagor, Murray overcame his psychologic weakness after W. Or do you think that Federer declined within of two weeks???
The fool says: Murray reached his peak after Wimbledon. For several yaers before he was an "almost champion". Now he can compete with any player in the world.
The Rosewall not winning W. argument lets me wonder who of us is a fool...
lol, wut ?
delpo won the USO beating fed/nadal back to back ....
murray's record is so much superior to gerulatis or tanner ( who only won one major in enormously weakened AO fields ) ........its a no contest ....
mecir was highly talented, but lacked the mental strength to win a major ....
zagor, Murray overcame his psychologig weakness after W. Or do you think that Federer declined within of two weeks???
Eh? I can't really understand your surprise, from what I've observed over the years I'd say pc1 agrees/shares the opinion with the vast majority of things BobbyOne (or other like Kiki) are saying about Fed, he just doesn't state them directly as they do.
He competed with Federer at Wimbledon, he just lost. I guess you don't peak until you beat Federer on a big stage?
You're still the fool. Federer has no touch? lol. Atleast try and pretend like you've watched some modern tennis. He didn't win the biggest prize in the sport, am I wrong? Because I'd only be a fool if I was wrong...
eh, while I do think pc1 manages to hide the fact that he doesn't like federer much very well, I don't think he's anywhere near as ignorant as these 2 and in fact, can't help but grudgingly admire federer at times, but these two fellas BobbyOne & kiki are on a different stratosphere ....
eh, while I do think pc1 manages to hide the fact that he doesn't like federer much very well, I don't think he's anywhere near as ignorant as these 2 and in fact, can't help but grudgingly admire federer at times, but these two fellas BobbyOne & kiki are on a different stratosphere ....
Gerulaitis won the WCT finals, a major.Del Potro and Murray no.
Tanner took Borg to five sets at the Wimbledon Final.And won Melbourne devastating legendary Guillermo Vilas in the final.
Limphitter was alright too, he gave fair perspective on modern era players
You're talking about a merely different package/facade/approach but underneath all that I don't think his opinion on Federer differs very much at all.
You're talking about a merely different package/facade/approach but underneath all that I don't think his opinion on Federer differs very much at all.
what the hell are you on about ?
murray won the USO in 2012 defeating djokovic
delpo won the USO in 2009 defeating nadal and federer back to back
WCT, while very important, was not a major in 87 .... you do realize the field in the AO in 87 was good , ended with an excellent final b/w edberg & cash ?
the top 11 seeds at the AO read:
lendl, becker,noah, edberg, leconte,mecir, gilbert, curren,jarryd, kriek, cash .... if that's not a legit major field with a best of 5 format, I don't know what is .....
Edit : I thought you were saying mecir for a minute there ...
legendary vilas who couldn't make it past the QF at wimbledon ... sure :roll:
yeah, tanner played very well in wimbledon 1979 final ... so did murray in wimbledon 2012 final or AO 2012 SF or AO 2010 QF or USO 2008 SF ...so did delpo in 2009 FO semi vs fed, 4R match vs nadal in wimbledon 2011 ....so ?
You are much smarter than abmk, who loves to talk without saying anything in concretion.
I think Murray losing Wimbledon final to a mediocre grasscourter (with no touch and volleys) like Fed undeniably proves he couldn't have possibly been at his peak at that point of time, he still had to wait for 2 whole more weeks.
I knew you wouldn´t be able to get over that.You shouldn´t read things for adults.
They try to hijack the post and cannot stand losing.Like Federer himself ( and unless Laver or Rosewall) they are bitter losers ( when they don´t break into tears like their icon).Look at Nadalqueen reactions...
Vitas and Roscoe also reached bunch of semis and quarters sinc eyou value it so highly.In case you don´t know, which i think so since you are clueless and cannot smell anything winding before 2000´s, let me recall you that the 77 semi at W between Borg and Gerulaitis is considered by many the best ever tennis match.Vitas also lost a classical 5 set match at the Masters (Lendl)
Murray and Del Po have 1 major and Vitas has 2.Maybe in the future they equalize or overcome him, not now...without mentioning that they played the golden era with the best players at their prime, and that is a plus.Murray playes injuried Nadal and out of peak Federer.OK he plays Djokovic but it is not enough to put him in the same breath as those legends yet
1. federer safin AO 2005 SF
2. mac-connors USO 1984 SF
3. roddick el ayanoui AO 2003 QF
4. nadal verdasco AO 2009 SF
5. borg gerulatis 77 wimbledon SF
6. sampras agassi USO 2001 QF
..............
vitas has zero "majors" - AO wasn't a 'true' major in 77 .... FO, wimbledon , USO & the masters were the best 4 events in 77
WCT wasn't close to one in 78 either with defending champ connors not playing and borg withdrawing from the semi with an injury ......
as far as the 77 wimbledon SF goes, yes, it was a classic .... so was the AO 2009 SF b/w nadal and verdasco & verdasco wasn't near the player that gerulaitis was ... same case for the AO 2003 QF roddick & el ayanoui match ... el ayanoui was nowhere near the player that vitas overall was ( in part due to major injuries ), but in this match, his all-court play was downright sick ....
btw here's a mention I made of that 77 SF myself months before :
Best non-final match of the open era :
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=7052572&postcount=2
gerulaitis was a very good all around player, but lacked that one special weapon to hurt either borg/connors ....
ironical that for tanner, you didn't mention him winning over borg in 79 USO & over connors in wimbldon 76 ( this was after connors had demolished him the previous year in one of the finest displays of returning )
Sure kiki. I still think you could help out a lot of kids by giving them before and after scans of your brain. They need to be aware of what happens to people who fall off the wagon.
I'm sure everyone is sorry to spoil your party with reason. It really is a nasty business.
nadal-Verdasco¡¡¡
Roddick-El Aynaoui¡¡¡
abmk, this is priceless...
nadal-Verdasco¡¡¡
Roddick-El Aynaoui¡¡¡
abmk, this is priceless...
I'm not surprised at your reaction, given you are near clueless about modern day tennis ...
google is your friend ......both these matches were tennis at its finest .....
oh and both those matches are on youtube .....you can watch and decide for yourself ....
There is no shame in crying, albeit I cannot imagine Laver doing that in such dramatic Hollywood way as Federer...but, listen, he cried again during the Olimpics...what´s wrong with him? shouldn´t he be playing the WTA?
Bertolucci vs Nastase in 78 or Connors vs Pernfors in 87, Connors vs Gomez in 81, look at them.
BTW, what´s Aynaoui best ever rank?
In which world can be imagined Becker inferior to Djokovic?
A GOAT contender with a backhand and volley weakness, a GOAT candidate with only 17 majors (Rosewall 23, Laver 19), in some years realized with rather weak competition (compare Gonzalez, Rosewall, Hoad, Trabert, Sedgman and Segura with Roddick, Safin, Hewitt, Baghdatis, F. Gonzalez)...
A GOAT contender with a backhand and volley weakness, a GOAT candidate with only 17 majors (Rosewall 23, Laver 19), in some years realized with rather weak competition (compare Gonzalez, Rosewall, Hoad, Trabert, Sedgman and Segura with Roddick, Safin, Hewitt, Baghdatis, F. Gonzalez)...
Bobby you cannot call yourself a historian, or even a tennis fan or enthusiast, if you don't seriously consider Fed to be a GOAT contender.
Indeed, the greatest player of the modern game is apparently a nobody compared to the giants of 50 years ago and their split field records. Bobby is a joke. Tired of sugarcoating it.
was that the intentional choice of word lol?
Djokovic has already matched or surpassed all of Becker's stats and he is only 25. Becker has only the same # of majors, also didnt win the career slam, doesnt have a record at any slam as good as Djokovic's at the Australian Open doesnt have a good record at the French Open as Djokovic, doesnt even have as good a record at the U.S Open. Becker never ended a year ranked #1. It really isnt any contest at this point, and the gap will only continue to widen. As for by surface in playing ability:
Slow hard courts: Djokovic >>>> Becker
Fast hard courts: Djokovic >>>> Becker
Grass: Becker >>> Djokovic
Carpet: Not much to go by but still Becker > Djokovic
Clay: Djokovic >>>> Becker
was that the intentional choice of word lol?
No...but it works quite well now that you mention it lol.