v-verb
Hall of Fame
Did not know that Julia Goerges had a big serve? Maybe if Masha was built like her...........................
That would be delightful:twisted::twisted::twisted::twisted:
Did not know that Julia Goerges had a big serve? Maybe if Masha was built like her...........................
OK.
I can see that the fellas at TT need a woman to jump in here and translate.
What Maria was really saying was:
I think if I was juicing like Serena and could make myself as muscular as David Ferrer, I hope I'd be able to hit a big serve like that too
That would be a mistake on her part for two reasons:
1 - There's no evidence of SW "juicing."
2. In the early years, there were rumors that as a child, Sharapova had been treated with hormones designed to make her a taller person, (thought to explain her odd shape, unusually broad shoulders, etc.). As in the SW and Nadal case, there's no evidence for this, so if that "juicing" is what Sharapova implied, it would just as assbrained as those who accused her father of "engineering" his own daughter in the hope of a payday.
OK.
I can see that the fellas at TT need a woman to jump in here and translate.
What Maria was really saying was:
That would be a mistake on her part for two reasons:
1 - There's no evidence of SW "juicing."
2. In the early years, there were rumors that as a child, Sharapova had been treated with hormones designed to make her a taller person, (thought to explain her odd shape, unusually broad shoulders, etc.). As in the SW and Nadal case, there's no evidence for this, so if that "juicing" is what Sharapova implied, it would just as assbrained as those who accused her father of "engineering" his own daughter in the hope of a payday.
There wasn't any evidence of Marion Jones using PEDs, either.
Just sayin' . . .
OK.
I can see that the fellas at TT need a woman to jump in here and translate.
What Maria was really saying was:
That would be a mistake on her part for two reasons:
1 - There's no evidence of SW "juicing."
2. In the early years, there were rumors that as a child, Sharapova had been treated with hormones designed to make her a taller person, (thought to explain her odd shape, unusually broad shoulders, etc.). As in the SW and Nadal case, there's no evidence for this, so if that "juicing" is what Sharapova implied, it would just as assbrained as those who accused her father of "engineering" his own daughter in the hope of a payday.
An issue people aren't talking about is the double standards for female athletes. Let's be honest here, I'm not straight, but I imagine the reason Sharapova gets so many endorsements is BECAUSE she has a very feminine image.
Female athletes have a tricky balance they must be athletic but not too athletic, they have to be sexy to appease the straight guys.
So a female athlete can't win, if she doesn't work out hard and lift weights people call her lazy. But if a woman does lift weights people on the internet call
her a lesbian slur word which I won't repeat.
I think some of the straight guys here are a bit hypocritical, they always talk about how pretty Sharapova is, and how they want to have sex with her.
A lot of women want to look like Maria Sharapova and the men want to have sex with her and that's what advertisers are counting on.
Sharapova is the HIGHEST paid female athlete in the world Forbes said she made close to $30 million dollars OFF court last year.
Maria makes so much money because sponsors believe she can sell to consumers especially heterosexual male consumers. If you go on numerous sports websites the men are salivating they always talk about how attractive Maria Sharapova is, then after that they talk about her tennis.
Maria knows this, she isn't going to bulk up and lift weights, she even said so after winning the Indian Wells event in an interview.
Maria seems very concerned about maintaining her femininity which I believe a lot of female athletes worry about.
Samantha Stosur gets called a man all the time, on sports forums because of her broad shoulders and big serve. Even on this message board people who don't like Serena call her a man too.
So, female athletes have to deal with a lot of pressure, how does a woman maintain her femininity yet also excel at sports?
If a female athlete lifts weights and gets strong she is ridiculed by sports fans. So on one hand I can see Maria Sharapova's reluctance to lift weights.
So, it has got to be tough for Samantha and Serena, because calling a woman a man is a huge insult and that's what Maria is doing.
Sharapova is ridiculing Serena for working out and taking tennis seriously. Serena is a professional she knows to be the best she must work out in get into
top physical condition. Sharapova though wants to maintain her femininity at all costs so she's never going to lift weights.
But making fun of Serena for taking her job seriously is tacky on Maria's part and shows she's a sore loser.
I am no Maria fan, but I think she chooses not to light weights because she doesn't want to hurt her brand or her femininity.
Female athletes are judged rather harshly by male sports fans.
The pretty ones like Ana Ivanovic, Agnieszka Radwanska or Maria Sharapova can rank in millions of dollars in endorsements.
How much money is Samantha Stosur making off the court anyone know? I think Stosur is an attractive woman but again she doesn't have the build that sponsors like.
I also think Serena Williams is an attractive woman but she doesn't make close to what Sharapova makes off the court.
You must be ignorant about some sports or trolling. Not Stosur or William's problem if the other girls care more about their looks than what's actually good for their performances.Many women lift weights. Not very many wind up with the physique of a Serena Williams or a Stosur.
And it's not just their muscularity which generates suspicion. Stosur has a very deep, 'masculine' voice. There are women who have husky voices, but that's very different from having a deep, masculine sounding voice.
We all know PED use is rampant. It's odd then that despite the consensus, everyone acts shocked when a specific player is mentioned.
Many women lift weights. Not very many wind up with the physique of a Serena Williams or a Stosur.
You must be ignorant about some sports or trolling. Not Stosur or William's problem if the other girls care more about their looks than what's actually good for their performances.
And they are always told that they should do 3 sets of 10 reps using light weights so they can be "toned" (as opposed to heavy weights fewer reps which will make them look "bulky").
Like they have the choice about genetics and that is has anything to do with hitting the gym or drugs. Confirms you were indeed trolling. Thanks for the confirmation.Yeah, a lot of women probably don't want back acne, a cranium the size of a meteor, a jawline like andre the giant, or a voice like barry white. How dare they?!?
Great argument. I suppose doing fewer reps with heavier weights also gives women back acne or increases the size of their heads too. And makes their voice deeper. And makes their skin age. And gives them an adam's apple.
You must be ignorant about some sports or trolling.
Maria plays the wrong game vs. Serena, you can't try to slug and KO Tyson (Serena) you have to box and move and trick her. Maria doesn't have that variety, she just ball bashes, which is just what Serena wants. Terrible match up for Maria who does nothing better than Serena, not even shrieking.
Surgapova is the Greatest Model to have ever picked up tennis racquet. That is no small feat.
Justine Henin has a better serve than Sharapova and she's only five foot five. Henin is also SMARTER than Sharapova she knew against Serena you've got use a lot of slice, angles, drop shots, attack the net, mix it up.
Sharapova loses to Serena because she has a very one dimensional game. She just hits harder and harder, but Serena loves pace so her game plan is usually ineffective.
Serena does not have a preference for ball bashing; as a player who can play any part of the court, she has defeated all types of players, including the "all-courters" such as Henin, Mauresmo and now Radwanska, among others.
So they player that varies strategies depending of the opponents and the one that hits the cover off the ball all the time whoever is on the other side of the net, there isn't one that's smarter? Interesting.Henin wasn't any "SMARTER" than Maria. In fact your proved it yourself in your next paragraph. Maria doesn't posses the ability to hit the shots Justine hit. IF Justine had Maria's down the line forehand she would have mixed that in too but she didn't possess it. Maria is a great player but Serena is an all time great.
"I think if I was built like Serena I hope I'd be able to hit a big serve like that, too"
...
So they player that varies strategies depending of the opponents and the one that hits the cover off the ball all the time whoever is on the other side of the net, there isn't one that's smarter? Interesting.
Of course not many people can have the deadly slice of Graf or the serve of Roddick, but you don't need to be a genius of some sort to hit a decent slice or vary spins and be able to play two balls in a row at net. Henin could, Sharapova can't. And it isn't because she's "unable to" physically or something. She doesn't train that part of the game, that's all.
Don't think it has to do with muscles. Look how much smoother and fluid Serena's serve is than Maria's. One serve you see Maria never consistently hit well is the slice out wide or the kicker to the backhand. She just doesn't have good enough of a motion to create those serves consistently.
Serena does not have a preference for ball bashing; as a player who can play any part of the court, she has defeated all types of players, including the "all-courters" such as Henin, Mauresmo and now Radwanska, among others.
OK.
I can see that the fellas at TT need a woman to jump in here and translate.
What Maria was really saying was:
That would be a mistake on her part for two reasons:
1 - There's no evidence of SW "juicing."
2. In the early years, there were rumors that as a child, Sharapova had been treated with hormones designed to make her a taller person, (thought to explain her odd shape, unusually broad shoulders, etc.). As in the SW and Nadal case, there's no evidence for this, so if that "juicing" is what Sharapova implied, it would just as assbrained as those who accused her father of "engineering" his own daughter in the hope of a payday.
1. There's no evidence of anyone (that hasn't been caught) juicing, but people lie about it all the time.
2. I am in shock to hear someone else repeat this. I read this years ago. But, when I went back to save it, it was gone and I never saw or heard a word about it until now.
Sharapova must really hate these Nike sponsored events with Serena, Roger and Nadal. "Oh, there she is again with the big serve, and I cannot beat her. She must be really below par in 2004"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=nLCfwy6ZaMc&feature=endscreen
Wow. I must say Maria looks stunning here. :shock:
Maria needs to find Roger's hair stylist.
No likey? :-?
Sharapova must really hate these Nike sponsored events with Serena, Roger and Nadal. "Oh, there she is again with the big serve, and I cannot beat her. She must be really below par in 2004"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=nLCfwy6ZaMc&feature=endscreen
I don't understand all these comments about Sharapova's shoulders. Her shoulders look normal to me. And for a professional athlete I would say they are probably narrower than other female athletes. Have a look at some female pro baller and soccer players if you want a comparison.
Sharapova must really hate these Nike sponsored events with Serena, Roger and Nadal. "Oh, there she is again with the big serve, and I cannot beat her. She must be really below par in 2004"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=nLCfwy6ZaMc&feature=endscreen
Maria is correct.