Perhaps ironically in this case, Fed wins every poll (regardless of its content).
hoodjem, In this case the place of Federer is okay.
Perhaps ironically in this case, Fed wins every poll (regardless of its content).
hoodjem, In this case the place of Federer is okay.
Let's talk about a mid 30's Lendl straight setting the number 1 ranked at the time peak Sampras on a fast hard court.
Laver or earlier pre open greats. No matter how weak you say today's field it, a split field some forty years ago has got to be weaker!
It seems people are heavily impressed by the competition of Rosewall and Borg. The only two GOAT contenders with virtually no votes.
it does not matter. becoming world no.1 by beating the world no.1 en route to winning a slam is the most impressive achievement
illusions30, Actually both players had a bunch of all time great opponents. For instance Rosewall played many greats from Kramer to Borg.
illusions30, Actually both players had a bunch of all time great opponents. For instance Rosewall played many greats from Kramer to Borg.
it does not matter. becoming world no.1 by beating the world no.1 en route to winning a slam is the most impressive achievement
You seem to be the most knowledgeable poster on this forum, especialy of players in the Pre Open Era. How would you rank these 7 as far as the quality of their competition.
Laver or earlier pre open greats. No matter how weak you say today's field it, a split field some forty years ago has got to be weaker!
And Federer has played greats like Sampras/Agassi up to Djokovic/Murray and beyond...
I agree. Rafa also didn't have to play his nightmare matchups in all of his major semis and finals also.
Federer played Sampras once (Unless you count the 2007 exos with Sampras 5 years retired, who Fed lost to as well), at the end of Pete's career. And played gimped up mid 30s Agassi at the end of his career as well..
When Fed was amassing slams from 2004-2007, Murray was 4-5 years from his true prime and Nole was 4 years from his prime. Fed had already broken the slam record by the time these two got their crap together. I think Fed was on 13 slams or something by the time Nole even won his FIRST slam
Fed's main contemporary rivals are Roddick, Hewitt, Davydenko, Safin, Nalbandian (and Nadal to some extent)
Lets put this into perspective at least
Fed is in the lead.
So you are saying Rafa is weak competition?
Yes he was on grass and hard till 2008 ....and for a while he was not on tour or injured.
2009 for example Nadal had a bad year due to injuries and personal issues..... Fed won wimby and his only FO to barely keep him in goat contention.
2010...nadal returns and wins wimby ,FO and USO
It's a perfect example of fed without Nadal and Fed with Nadal.
Fed is in the lead.
Nadal, he has never played peak Murray.
No strength in depth in the field.
No clay competition, biggest challenge was Federer (weak clay courter) and with that match up on clay it would take Nadal to have his leg cut off for him to lose to Roger
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=480658
Yes he was on grass and hard till 2008 ....and for a while he was not on tour or injured.
2009 for example Nadal had a bad year due to injuries and personal issues..... Fed won wimby and his only FO to barely keep him in goat contention.
2010...nadal returns and wins wimby ,FO and USO
It's a perfect example of fed without Nadal and Fed with Nadal.
How many RG champions did Rafa beat?
How many RG champions did Rafa beat?
Two,
himself in 2009 :lol:
and RF of course!
What FO champion would Nadal lose to?
Gaudio?? Vilas? Borg? Chang? Lendl? Wilander? Noah ?
Nadal would beat them all.
illusions30, Thanks for your compliment. But there are also others who write very reasonably.
Regarding competition:
Gonzalez, Rosewall and Laver about even (these are also my top three of my GOAT list),
Borg
Sampras
Nadal
Federer
Two,
himself in 2009 :lol:
and RF of course!
What FO champion would Nadal lose to?
Gaudio?? Vilas? Borg? Chang? Lendl? Wilander? Noah ?
Nadal would beat them all.
If Nadal, the surface GOAT is not considered the toughest competition, then I don't know what is.
Nadal is clay goat and arguably top 3 in the open era. Nobody had it that rough. Rafa took like 8 majors away from Fed. Nobody had such competition, nobody.
And you know this how? You have a time machine?
Nadal wold lose to himself and he didn't get to play 8 RG champion, otherwise he would have only 4 RG titles.
If Soderling can beat Rafa who is mug on clay. And Nole who made ONE RG final. And in 2011 when he was at his best, he didn't touch Fed at RG, but he owned RAfa and he almost defeated Rafa this year.
If Soderling can defeat Rafa and Nole and Isner can take Rafa to 5 sets, I'm sure RG champions could defeat Rafa.
I know the truth hurts. Maybe Fed had it easy for 2-3 years. But not as easy as Rafa on clay for the past 8 years.
This year Ferrer was the best clay courter, who can't win a match against Fed and is old???
Isn't Federer supposed to be the HC and grass GOAT? Just letting you know, Rafa beat him in majors on those surfaces. Federer was never able to even take Nadal to 5 sets at RG.
Coming back from 0-40 down, holding and breaking Novak, and then hitting 22 winners in the 4th says, Nole didn't almost win that match.
The truth is, he wasn't even close.
People need to quit saying this, because it simply isn't true.
You can't own someone who has always beaten you more than you beat him.
If Soderling can defeat Rafa and Nole and Isner can take Rafa to 5 sets, I'm sure RG champions could defeat Rafa.
Well, Roger who is a RG champion, never did in 5 attempts.
I'm talking RG, not USO.
Isn't Federer supposed to be the HC and grass GOAT? Just letting you know, Rafa beat him in majors on those surfaces. Federer was never able to even take Nadal to 5 sets at RG.
Hardcourt GOAT top 3 on grass IMO. Nadal is better on clay than any player on any surface ever.
Well, Roger who is a RG champion, never did in 5 attempts.
All due respect to Roger, but he is not GOAT candidate on clay. Never was. It was always his weakest surface. The guy lost his first 11 matches on clay. Says everything about him on that surface. The fact he managed to win a RG title during a REAL Clay GOAT candidate's reign, speaks volumes for Federer's determination.
So you are saying Rafa is weak competition?
So you would have to agree then, that if there were 2 clay slams instead of 2 HC slams, Nadal would have close to 20 majors by now and be completely out of reach when it comes to the slam count.
However, since there are 2 HC slams, this gives Federer the better chance to boost his slam count (in which he did).
So maybe some of you guys should think about that before you complain that Fed was unlucky to have run into Nadal at RG.
Picture this, if Nadal weren't around, Fed would probably have 6 RG titles by now and RG would be his second best slam and clay would be his second best surface.
Then afterwards, (Let's go with 2016) Nadal comes along and wins 7 RG titles from that point forward. Tell me there wouldn't be Fed***** whinging that if Fed was around he'd beat Nadal at RG and how lucky Nadal is to have avoided Fed LOL.
So you would have to agree then, that if there were 2 clay slams instead of 2 HC slams, Nadal would have close to 20 majors by now and be completely out of reach when it comes to the slam count.
However, since there are 2 HC slams, this gives Federer the better chance to boost his slam count (in which he did).
So maybe some of you guys should think about that before you complain that Fed was unlucky to have run into Nadal at RG.
Picture this, if Nadal weren't around, Fed would probably have 6 RG titles by now and RG would be his second best slam and clay would be his second best surface.
Then afterwards, (Let's go with 2016) Nadal comes along and wins 7 RG titles from that point forward. Tell me there wouldn't be Fed***** whinging that if Fed was around he'd beat Nadal at RG and how lucky Nadal is to have avoided Fed LOL.
It has to be true since 2005 both Nadal and Federer are competing against the same field. TDK can't deny that Nadal's 8 RG are from a very weak competition.
But you are saying Fed is a weak era mug, so he is not the goat and therefore Rafa had it easy . You are saying Rafa is clay goat, so Fed had it tough.
Also Fed never had an advantage to play past prime Rafa. A bit unlucky. Or play him more at HC majors in his prime.
And beating one guy one time doesn't impress me. He never beat him at uso final. Beat him once at AO final and once at W, close lucky 5 sets. And wasn't even peak Fed.
This is like me gloating Fed defeated old Pete at W, so he that's why he is the grass goat. Doesn't mean that much.
If the clay was like Hamburg or Madrid or even Har tru then maybe Federer would have beaten Nadal for a couple of clay slams. Hypotheticals are irrelvant what if 3 slams were still on grass. Federer's level is flat out much better on grass and any Harcourt compared to clay. That is true whether he has 1 RG or 6.