I found this article interesting from Dr Joe Mercola
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...=20160327Z1&et_cid=DM101538&et_rid=1416306282
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...=20160327Z1&et_cid=DM101538&et_rid=1416306282
The cardiology literature has suggested for decades that brisk walking for at least 20 minutes three or more times a week confers as much cardiac disease protection as any more strenuous regimen.
It starts off with seemingly common sense advice and ends up with a family sleeping on the floor with no furniture. That's the part I find interesting.I found this article interesting from Dr Joe Mercola
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...=20160327Z1&et_cid=DM101538&et_rid=1416306282
The deceptive part is that, while 30 minutes of walking a day seems easy, it really isn't. It forces a lifestyle change at the most basic level.
It's interesting to see it play out in real life with real people instead of just ranting about it on the internet.
I've actually been thinking about this a quite a bit. I keep pointing out to relatives that I am not much better off than them even though I run/exercise daily, since I am sedentary for the other 23 hours. Just one hour less than totally sedentary people.
So if getting people to walk 30 minutes a day is difficult to the point of being impossible, this should shed some light on the types of changes people are realistically going to make.
I thought (in the 80s) the ballpark figure was 40 minutes of jogging , and keeping your heart rate up to (i think) 120 bpm for 40 minutes or so , thrice a week at least.The cardiology literature has suggested for decades that brisk walking for at least 20 minutes three or more times a week confers as much cardiac disease protection as any more strenuous regimen.
I don't believe it's knowledge based. The reason are much more "non-reflective". Let's say it just comes down to habits.Agreed. It's very difficult and nearly impossible for many people. I think the reason is they are not clear or convinced about the benefits. It's just hard to expense energy voluntarily. It is not easy or clear cut to get the benefits from a 30 minute walk.
I work for a small company, so most of us have to take on different roles. In addition to accounting, I'm the "Wellness Coordinator". This is the type of stuff we try to encourage in various ways. It's not particularly successful. I won't go into all the reasons why (they aren't really important), but the fundamental reason is what I cite in the previous paragraph. It's interesting to see it play out in real life with real people instead of just ranting about it on the internet.
So if getting people to walk 30 minutes a day is difficult to the point of being impossible, this should shed some light on the types of changes people are realistically going to make.
For me it's ensuring I get high enough participation numbers. Then it has to be easy enough to jump through the hoops to complete all the steps to get credit. It's about our health insurance and the incentive we get for participation in stuff like this.Point is, don't despair. It's not that hard for people to make small changes.
I don't believe it's knowledge based. The reason are much more "non-reflective". Let's say it just comes down to habits.
That's the theory our Wellness program operates under as well. If we just give people enough facts, they will surely change their habits.It is knowledge or specifically the lack of it.
I am sedentary for the other 23 hours.
How many hours a week do you spend doing these activities?Just a fad. Soon people will realize that unnecessary moving wears out their joints. It is much better to do things like stretching and yoga, or swimming.
Just a fad. Soon people will realize that unnecessary moving wears out their joints. It is much better to do things like stretching and yoga, or swimming.
Reading his posts reminds me of the chaps in Idiocracy. Or perhaps also Wall-E. I can't imagine what we would evolve into, if everyone followed suresh's pearls of wisdomI don't buy this. A certain level of movement, impact, and stress on the joints is probably necessary for their maintenance. Walking for a few hours a day in various situations, reaching for things, and doing a variety of movements encourages joints to stay mobile and heal.
With bones, studies show that impact encourages bone density later in life. In rehabbing a wrist injury from tennis, a lot of exercises for my hands and forearms has made the biggest difference in reducing pain and increasing mobility. Movement in general with a lot of variety is probably very good for joints.
Just a fad. Soon people will realize that unnecessary moving wears out their joints. It is much better to do things like stretching and yoga, or swimming.
I thought all of us were evolving into Sureshs, as he is morally just, intellectually superior, and aesthetically beautiful.Thanks for bringing in the part of impact and bone density/strength. I did read an article a few months back about hopping wrt strengthening bones.
Reading his posts reminds me of the chaps in Idiocracy. Or perhaps also Wall-E. I can't imagine what we would evolve into, if everyone followed suresh's pearls of wisdom
.
But reading your posts is good for my bowel movements.Consider playing tennis rather than posting here
I thought (in the 80s) the ballpark figure was 40 minutes of jogging , and keeping your heart rate up to (i think) 120 bpm for 40 minutes or so , thrice a week at least.
20 seems a lot less to me.
In Indian cities there are hordes of people who walk 30 minutes every evening, and many of them brisk. But not sure if it helps them, they look the same after years, but i guess they balance it out with unhealthy eating.
Although, I agree walking 20 minutes is better than nothing, but not sure if it really helps the heart as you say, but i guess you are the doctor here. Do point me to any links if you have them ready, thankx.
I don't buy this. A certain level of movement, impact, and stress on the joints is probably necessary for their maintenance. Walking for a few hours a day in various situations, reaching for things, and doing a variety of movements encourages joints to stay mobile and heal.
With bones, studies show that impact encourages bone density later in life. In rehabbing a wrist injury from tennis, a lot of exercises for my hands and forearms has made the biggest difference in reducing pain and increasing mobility. Movement in general with a lot of variety is probably very good for joints.
That's the theory our Wellness program operates under as well. If we just give people enough facts, they will surely change their habits.