2024 WTA Indian Wells

Which lady will win?


  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

ronalditop

Hall of Fame
I thought the match was gonna end something like 62 61. I'm glad Sakkari could won more than 3 games. She's improving.
 
Last edited:

spystud

Talk Tennis Guru

D-Lite

Hall of Fame
In 10 WTA 1000-level **finals** Iga has more bagels delivered (5) than lost sets (4).
Impressive feat. It seems the tour really are at her mercy. For my liking, she's not playing Sabalenka or Rybakina enough. When you combine tournament withdrawals, walkovers and surprise losses with their high seeds, the stars have to align for them to meet. I think Osaka will need to return to absolute top gear to be able to trouble Iga, and as we all know Gauff can only beat her when she's on top form and Swiatek has a bad day. It is also a shame Muchova fell of the face of the Earth last year with injury after some good results last year and actually taking Iga to 3 at RG. I really hope we can see some more challenges for her this year, as it's impressive but we all want some drama and close match ups.
 

AM75

Hall of Fame
What was Seles or Hingis average topspin rate? 1500 rpm? 1800 at best? Świątek averages closer to 3000 with as much if not more speed. On clay this is massive. The speed plus topspin rate would absolutely bludgeon Graf's backhand on clay.
Iga‘s fanboys have no clue, really. Come to Wollerau and watch Hingis training (she does train still) in TC Ried. You‘ll be surprised how hard her strokes are and how good her topspin is.
Tennis evolves, and we don‘t know how good great players would be if they had today‘s racquets and strings. Hingis could definitely still compete and be good in doubles at least. She just choose not to.
 

Connor35

Semi-Pro
II think Osaka will need to return to absolute top gear to be able to trouble Iga, and as we all know Gauff can only beat her when she's on top form and Swiatek has a bad day.

When Naomi last played Iga before her break, Miami 2022, Iga bageled her in the final.
 

Gizo

Hall of Fame
Swiatek has now won 8 WTA 1000 events, and over a 35 month period span since May 2021.

On hard courts she has won the US Open, YEC, 6 WTA 1000 titles and 3 WTA 500 titles (plus a WTA 250 title), and she hasn’t turned 23 yet.

So in other words she is doing brilliantly !
 

pcplum

Rookie
Świątek has 19/23 record in tournament finals. She only lost finals to 3 players - Krejcikova (Ostrava/Dubai), Sabalenka (Madrid) and Polona Hercog (Lugano 2019)
 

Connor35

Semi-Pro
Swiatek has now won 8 WTA 1000 events, and over a 35 month period span since May 2021.

On hard courts she has won the US Open, YEC, 6 WTA 1000 titles and 3 WTA 500 titles (plus a WTA 250 title), and she hasn’t turned 23 yet.

So in other words she is doing brilliantly !

Yep. Iga has more 1000 titles than #2 Sabalenka, #3 Gauff and #4 Sabalenka combined.

Some people think of her as a clay court specialist, but she also has as many 1000-level *hard court* titles as #2, #3 and #4 combined.
 

robyrolfo

Hall of Fame
What was Seles or Hingis average topspin rate? 1500 rpm? 1800 at best? Świątek averages closer to 3000 with as much if not more speed. On clay this is massive. The speed plus topspin rate would absolutely bludgeon Graf's backhand on clay.

I'll give you that - you didn't comment on Świątek's attractiveness but you still don't like the way her face looks because it doesn't fit your mental picture of the way "smart and savvy champion" should look like on the court. She doesn't look smart to you and that's ok but her recognition of her own psychological shortcomings is the actual proof she is smart and savvy enough and is trying her best to utilise what mother nature gave her in athletic abilities.

Oh I must've missed that gem about Serena earlier. Were you actually telling people off for bringing up Serena's stats there? So it's not only about Świątek then. This is getting funnier and funnier.

Calling someone "the greatest human being" sounds pretty extreme to me. I wouldn't even call my wife that because she'd think I lost the plot.
If you ever meet Steffi in person under no circumstances tell her that she's the greatest human being because she would definitely file for a restraining order. Unless it's you, Andre - in which case welcome to TTW, pal!
First off, you really want to compare topspin rates between a player using modern equipment and strings, and players from 20 years ago? What? Not to mention that Seles was more of a flat hitter with her unique style. And for all the spin that Iga puts on the ball, what does it get her? Have you even seen her play lately? Most of her rally balls are harmless. They may have lots of spin, but if they land around the service line in the middle of the court (as most of them do), then they aren't going to trouble anyone. It only works because she occasionally hits one deeper or more angled (deliberately or not), but more often because her opponent is playing without a brain and simply tries to bash the ball harder than her.

More than that, I'd love to see how Swiatek is going to generate all that topspin when she is hitting a hard, low, angled slice that barely comes up off the ground. If you don't think Graf could completely disarm Swiatek with her amazing slice backhand, then you understand nothing.

And these comments on Swiatek's face? I don't even understand what you are talking about.

As for Serena's stats, people are welcome to talk about them, but they can't begin and end with the number of slams she has won. Because that is pretty much the only stat where she is superior to Graf and Navratilova (and not by much), while being vastly inferior in other stats.

Lastly, I'd suggest you work a bit on your reading comprehension. In CONTEXT, I was simply saying she is one of the greatest human beings to have ever played tennis. Not in general. But I guess you would need some critical thinking skills to grasp such a thing...

5 points in total in 2nd set!
Another bad look for the WTA and the current level of play.

Out of these two sets, I'd say half a set was quality tennis.
Yep. And all the complaints about equal match scheduling on the showcase courts. I'm fine with equal pay, because of the principle. But I have no issue with the men getting the big matches on the showcase courts right now.

That might change at some point in the future, and it wasn't always the case in the past, but today's WTA cannot guarantee an even semi-decent or competitive match in a big spot.

Iga‘s fanboys have no clue, really. Come to Wollerau and watch Hingis training (she does train still) in TC Ried. You‘ll be surprised how hard her strokes are and how good her topspin is.
Tennis evolves, and we don‘t know how good great players would be if they had today‘s racquets and strings. Hingis could definitely still compete and be good in doubles at least. She just choose not to.
Exactly. They don't seem to understand how the sport works, and how good some of those great players really were. And they clearly don't understand what the equipment was like in the 70's, 80's and 90's.
 

pcplum

Rookie
Haha, I take things back - we really need that restraining order for you.
Most of her rally balls are harmless. They may have lots of spin, but if they land around the service line in the middle of the court (as most of them do), then they aren't going to trouble anyone.
Yes, they clearly trouble no-one. You literally live in an alternate reality.

I'd love to see how Swiatek is going to generate all that topspin when she is hitting a hard, low, angled slice that barely comes up off the ground. If you don't think Graf could completely disarm Swiatek with her amazing slice backhand, then you understand nothing.
I'd love to see how Steffi is going to generate a hard, angled slice on clay off of much higher and pacier ball. As I said before you might have seen a clay court on a telly but you certainly never stood or play on one. You have no clue.

And these comments on Swiatek's face? I don't even understand what you are talking about.
Below is your own quote about the way she looks. I know you spout a lot of rubbish and it seems like you don't really understand it yourself.
Because she looks like a basket case during every match. Because she looks like she is on the verge of tears at all times, and never like a confident, in-control, smart and savvy champion.
 

pcplum

Rookie
Lastly, I'd suggest you work a bit on your reading comprehension. In CONTEXT, I was simply saying she is one of the greatest human beings to have ever played tennis. Not in general. But I guess you would need some critical thinking skills to grasp such a thing...
Nice try to spin on what you actually wrote but I'd be embarrassed too.
 

robyrolfo

Hall of Fame
Yes, they clearly trouble no-one. You literally live in an alternate reality.


I'd love to see how Steffi is going to generate a hard, angled slice on clay off of much higher and pacier ball. As I said before you might have seen a clay court on a telly but you certainly never stood or play on one. You have no clue.


Below is your own quote about the way she looks. I know you spout a lot of rubbish and it seems like you don't really understand it yourself.
Look at who Swiatek is playing lately, and now they are playing. Swiatek hits a weak 2nd serve, or an average rally ball that lands around the service line around the middle of the court, and what do most of her opponents do? They attempt to bash a ball right back at her, giving her yet another chance to try and hit a better shot. And on and on it goes. The moment she faces someone like Ostapenka, Sabalenka or Rybakina, when they are actually on their games, they immediately put Swiatek under pressure with some pace and/or angles that immediate scramble Swiatek's head.

And if you don't understand how Graf could easily use her slice against Swiatek, you have absolutely no understand of the sport, regardless of surface. We are talking about the greatest backhand slice in the history of Women's tennis, by far, and a shot that carried Graf to 22 slams by the age of 30. I mean, she only won a paltry 6 French Open titles, so clearly she struggled on the clay, right?

As for my quote, read it again. I mentioned your prior issues with reading comprehension, and this is yet another example. Saying that someone has a nervous look on their face has absolute nothing to do with how attractive their face may or may not be. Stop making things up. Marta Kostyuk looks like she is about to start crying in most of her matches, and her face looks absolutely gorgeous.

We have a new English teacher here. He/she is teaching you now how to read, and was teaching me before how to write.
Sure. I'm always happy to help.
 

ScottleeSV

Hall of Fame
Sabalenka is going to play, apparently. Feels like a car crash waiting to happen. She's emotional on court at the best of times.

Imagine if she reaches the final. The other player doing their speech is going to have to work really hard on what to say.
 

pcplum

Rookie
And if you don't understand how Graf could easily use her slice against Swiatek, you have absolutely no understand of the sport, regardless of surface. We are talking about the greatest backhand slice in the history of Women's tennis, by far, and a shot that carried Graf to 22 slams by the age of 30. I mean, she only won a paltry 6 French Open titles, so clearly she struggled on the clay, right?

As for my quote, read it again. I mentioned your prior issues with reading comprehension, and this is yet another example. Saying that someone has a nervous look on their face has absolute nothing to do with how attractive their face may or may not be. Stop making things up. Marta Kostyuk looks like she is about to start crying in most of her matches, and her face looks absolutely gorgeous.
As I said before - the pace plus topspin rate Graf faced in the 90's is nowhere near what Świątek is able to generate these days. She would absolutely destroy Graf's backhand.

As to the other bit - if you are able to read (clearly you're not) - you would have noticed that I had conceded that you hadn't commented on Świątek's "attractiveness". Nevertheless your comment on Świątek's lack of smart and savvy champion looks and your unhealthy obsession with Steffi Graf proves that you should seek help.
 

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru
As I said before - the pace plus topspin rate Graf faced in the 90's is nowhere near what Świątek is able to generate these days. She would absolutely destroy Graf's backhand.

As to the other bit - if you are able to read (clearly you're not) - you would have noticed that I had conceded that you hadn't commented on Świątek's "attractiveness". Nevertheless your comment on Świątek's lack of smart and savvy champion looks and your unhealthy obsession with Steffi Graf proves that you should seek help.
So Iga is already the GOAT? Or, more specifically, the best WTA player with the highest playing level?
 

robyrolfo

Hall of Fame
As I said before - the pace plus topspin rate Graf faced in the 90's is nowhere near what Świątek is able to generate these days. She would absolutely destroy Graf's backhand.

As to the other bit - if you are able to read (clearly you're not) - you would have noticed that I had conceded that you hadn't commented on Świątek's "attractiveness". Nevertheless your comment on Świątek's lack of smart and savvy champion looks and your unhealthy obsession with Steffi Graf proves that you should seek help.
You realize that Graf beat Lindsay Davenport during her 1999 French Open run, right? You don't think Linsday had powerful strokes? That's ALL she had, and Graf still handled it. You also seem to think Swiatek hits her best stuff on every single ball, which is nowhere near the case, even with opponents that are basically ball machines for her.

And yes, supporting the argument for Steffi Graf's greatness, on a tennis forum, is surely a sign of an unhealthy obsession. No doubt about it...
 

pcplum

Rookie
So Iga is already the GOAT? Or, more specifically, the best WTA player with the highest playing level?
Haha, absolutely yes! No, not really - crapload of flaws in her game but I still think Graf with her ohbh wouldn't cope with her on clay. On grass? No contest obviously. But we'll never find out anyway.
 
Top