you guys are right. it's important. So let's first see where both players are without the head to head and then compare them
federer: if he'd never played nadal in a slam, he'd have 15 slams. Let's keep weeks at no 1 the same (302 weeks)
nadal: if he'd never played federer in a slam, he'd have 6 slams. He has like 105? weeks at no1?
So is the h2h worth 9 slams and 200 weeks at no 1? I don't think it is worth that much.
federer: if he'd never played nadal in a slam, he'd have 15 slams. Let's keep weeks at no 1 the same (302 weeks)
nadal: if he'd never played federer in a slam, he'd have 6 slams. He has like 105? weeks at no1?
So is the h2h worth 9 slams and 200 weeks at no 1? I don't think it is worth that much.